Literature DB >> 33388329

Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system.

Colin Malone1, Diana S M Buist2, Jasmin Tiro3, William Barlow4, Hongyuan Gao2, John Lin1, Rachel L Winer5.   

Abstract

One in five U.S. women with health insurance are underscreened for cervical cancer. We sought to identify whether underscreening correlates differed among women with different levels of health care interaction. Among women age 30-64 years who were members of an integrated U.S. health system, we used 2014-2015 electronic health record data to identify underscreened cases (≥3.4 years since last Papanicolaou (Pap) test, n=3352) and screening-adherent controls (<3.4 years since last Pap test, n=45,359) and extracted data on potential underscreening correlates (demographics, health history, and healthcare utilization). We calculated the odds of underscreening in the total population and by subgroups defined by healthcare visits and online health portal usage in the prior 12 months. Underscreening was associated with older age (50-64 vs. 30-39; odds ratio (OR)=1.6; 95%CI=1.4-1.8), current tobacco use (vs. never use; OR=2.1; 95%CI=1.8-2.2), higher BMI (≥35 kg/m2 vs <25 kg/m2, OR=2.0; 95%CI=1.8-2.3), screening non-adherence for colorectal cancer (OR=5.1; 95%CI=4.6-5.7) and breast cancer (OR=8.1, 95%CI=7.2-9.0), and having no recent visit with their primary care provider (PCP) nor recent health portal use (vs. recent PCP visit and portal use; OR=8.4, 95%CI=7.6-9.4). Underscreening correlates were similar between the total study population and within all healthcare interaction groups. Interaction with the healthcare system is associated with lower odds of underscreening, but sociodemographic and health status correlates are similar regardless of primary care visits or online portal use. These data support the need for additional interventions to reach insured women who remain underscreened for cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Cervical cancer screening; Health care system; Patient portal; Primary care provider; Underscreening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33388329      PMCID: PMC7956225          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  74 in total

1.  Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Geetanjali D Datta; Graham A Colditz; Ichiro Kawachi; S V Subramanian; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Psycho-social influences upon older women's decision to attend cervical screening: A review of current evidence.

Authors:  Kirsty A Hope; Esther Moss; Charles W E Redman; Susan M Sherman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Why does cervical cancer occur in a state-of-the-art screening program?

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Walter K Kinney; Li C Cheung; Julia C Gage; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Thomas S Lorey; Nicolas Wentzensen; Brian Befano; John Schussler; Hormuzd A Katki; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Communication and colorectal cancer screening among the uninsured: data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (United States).

Authors:  Catherine P Cairns; K Viswanath
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Continuity of care and cancer screening among health plan enrollees.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Peter Franks; Robert J Reid; Joann G Elmore; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Jamie S Ostroff; Katherine N DuHamel; Thomas A D'Agostino; Marisol Hernandez; Mollie R Canzona; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Smoking is associated with pessimistic and avoidant beliefs about cancer: results from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.

Authors:  S L Quaife; A McEwen; S M Janes; J Wardle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-10-20

10.  Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.

Authors:  Marc Arbyn; Sara B Smith; Sarah Temin; Farhana Sultana; Philip Castle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Does mailing unsolicited HPV self-sampling kits to women overdue for cervical cancer screening impact uptake of other preventive health services in a United States integrated delivery system?

Authors:  Hitomi Kariya; Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; John Lin; Hongyuan Gao; Linda K Ko; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.018

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.