Literature DB >> 28502577

Psycho-social influences upon older women's decision to attend cervical screening: A review of current evidence.

Kirsty A Hope1, Esther Moss2, Charles W E Redman3, Susan M Sherman4.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide (WHO, 2016). In many developed countries the incidence of cervical cancer has been significantly reduced by the introduction of organised screening programmes however, in the UK, a fall in screening coverage is becoming a cause for concern. Much research attention has been afforded to younger women but age stratified mortality and incidence data suggest that older women's screening attendance is also worthy of study. This paper provides a review of current evidence concerning the psycho-social influences that older women experience when deciding whether to attend cervical screening. Few studies have focussed on older women and there are significant methodological issues with those that have included them in their samples. Findings from these studies indicate several barriers which may deter older women from screening, such as embarrassment and logistical issues. Drivers to screening include reassurance and a sense of obligation. Physical, social and emotional changes that occur as women age may also have an impact on attendance. This review concludes that there is a clear need for better understanding of the perceptions of older women specifically with regard to cervical cancer and screening. Future research should inform the design of targeted interventions and provision of information to enable informed decision-making regarding cervical screening among older women.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Cervical screening; Health and aging; Older women; Psycho-social influences; Screening uptake; Women's health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28502577     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  11 in total

1.  Acceptability of non-speculum clinician sampling for cervical screening in older women: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Madeleine Freeman; Jo Waller; Peter Sasieni; Anita Ww Lim; Laura Av Marlow
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Towards equity in organised cancer screening: the case of cervical cancer screening in France.

Authors:  Sylviane Darquy; Grégoire Moutel; Odile Jullian; Stéphanie Barré; Nathalie Duchange
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Barriers to cervical screening among older women from hard-to-reach groups: a qualitative study in England.

Authors:  Laura Marlow; Emily McBride; Laura Varnes; Jo Waller
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Could changing invitation and booking processes help women translate their cervical screening intentions into action? A population-based survey of women's preferences in Great Britain.

Authors:  Mairead Ryan; Jo Waller; Laura Av Marlow
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening.

Authors:  Laura A V Marlow; Mairead Ryan; Jo Waller
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Non-speculum sampling approaches for cervical screening in older women: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Landy; Tony Hollingworth; Jo Waller; Laura Av Marlow; Jane Rigney; Thomas Round; Peter D Sasieni; Anita Ww Lim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Why do people take part in atrial fibrillation screening? Qualitative interview study in English primary care.

Authors:  Sarah Hoare; Alison Powell; Rakesh Narendra Modi; Natalie Armstrong; Simon J Griffin; Jonathan Mant; Jenni Burt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Out of reach? Correlates of cervical cancer underscreening in women with varying levels of healthcare interactions in a United States integrated delivery system.

Authors:  Colin Malone; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin Tiro; William Barlow; Hongyuan Gao; John Lin; Rachel L Winer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  What factors are most influential in increasing cervical cancer screening attendance? An online study of UK-based women.

Authors:  Sarah Wilding; Sarah Wighton; Daisy Halligan; Robert West; Mark Conner; Daryl B O'Connor
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2020-08-07

10.  Advancing understanding of influences on cervical screening (non)-participation among younger and older women: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework and the COM-B model.

Authors:  Bernadine O'Donovan; Therese Mooney; Ben Rimmer; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Grainne Flannelly; Lorraine Doherty; Cara Martin; John O'Leary; Mairead O'Connor; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.