Literature DB >> 18162856

Continuity of care and cancer screening among health plan enrollees.

Joshua J Fenton1, Peter Franks, Robert J Reid, Joann G Elmore, Laura-Mae Baldwin.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although having a usual source of care has been associated with cancer screening, whether there is additional benefit from continuity with a specific physician is uncertain. In addition, little is known about the relationship between continuity of care and receipt of colorectal and prostate cancer screening.
METHODS: Subjects were enrolled in a Washington State health plan that operates an integrated delivery system that emphasizes access to primary care. Among patients age 50-78 years old with 2 or more primary care visits in 2002-2003 (N = 67,633), we determined whether higher continuity (>/=50% of visits with the most visited primary care provider) was associated with colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer screening. Random-effects logistic regression estimated adjusted percentages of patients who received fecal occult blood testing, lower endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy), screening mammography, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing.
RESULTS: Patients with higher continuity were more likely to receive fecal occult blood testing than patients with lower continuity (28.9% vs. 26.8%; P < 0.001) but less likely to receive lower endoscopy (12.9% vs. 14.3%; P < 0.001). Although higher continuity was not significantly associated with screening mammography (P = 0.38), men with higher continuity were more likely to receive PSA testing than men with lower continuity (39.4% vs. 37.4%; P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: In an insured population with a high degree of primary care access, continuity with a specific primary care physician was associated with the selection of less invasive colorectal cancer screening tests by patients and physicians and greater likelihood of PSA testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18162856     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148493a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  18 in total

1.  Cancer screening of long-term cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jessica R Schumacher; Whitney P Witt; Mari Palta; Noelle K Loconte; Susan M Heidrich; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Nancy Pandhi; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Preventive service gains from first contact access in the primary care home.

Authors:  Nancy Pandhi; Jennifer E DeVoe; Jessica R Schumacher; Christie Bartels; Carolyn T Thorpe; Joshua M Thorpe; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 3.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of group-randomized cancer screening studies.

Authors:  Erinn M Hade; David M Murray; Michael L Pennell; Dale Rhoda; Electra D Paskett; Victoria L Champion; Benjamin F Crabtree; Allen Dietrich; Mark B Dignan; Melissa Farmer; Joshua J Fenton; Susan Flocke; Robert A Hiatt; Shawna V Hudson; Michael Mitchell; Patrick Monahan; Salma Shariff-Marco; Stacey L Slone; Kurt Stange; Susan L Stewart; Pamela A Ohman Strickland
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Delay in Cancer Diagnosis: Causes and Possible Solutions.

Authors:  Mohammed H Al-Azri
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-09

6.  Association between continuity and access in primary care: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa L Cook; Richard P Golonka; Charles M Cook; Robin L Walker; Peter Faris; Shannon Spenceley; Richard Lewanczuk; Robert Wedel; Rebecca Love; Cheryl Andres; Susan D Byers; Tim Collins; Scott Oddie
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-11-16

7.  Relation between family physician retention and avoidable hospital admission in Newfoundland and Labrador: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  John C Knight; Maria Mathews; Kris Aubrey-Bassler
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-10-06

8.  Longitudinal adherence with fecal occult blood test screening in community practice.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Joann G Elmore; Diana S M Buist; Robert J Reid; Daniel J Tancredi; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Gilda G Medina; Sarah T Hawley; Paul Haidet; Judith L Bettencourt; Navkiran K Shokar; Bruce S Ling; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Factors Affecting Adherence in a Pragmatic Trial of Annual Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; William M Vollmer; Amanda F Petrik; Erin M Keast; Beverly B Green; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.