Literature DB >> 33386955

A comparison of pregnancy outcome of emergency modified transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed in twin and singleton pregnancies.

Minling Wei1,2, Yang Yang1,2, Xiaoying Jin1,2, Jingyan Yang1,2, Dong Huang1,2, Songying Zhang3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the pregnancy outcome of emergency cerclage performed in twin and singleton pregnancies.
METHODS: A retrospective trial was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital in Zhejiang, China, from January 2013 to December 2018. A total of 89 women with acute cervical incompetence underwent the emergency cerclage. Main outcome measures were gestational age at delivery and the fetal outcome.
RESULTS: There were 31 twin and 58 singleton pregnancies that underwent emergency cerclage. In singleton pregnancies, gestational age at delivery (31.57 ± 6.11 vs 28.81 ± 4.34, p = 0.016), and prolongation of pregnancy (8.69 ± 6.13 vs 5.41 ± 3.72, p < 0.001) were greater, and the preterm delivery rate before 34 weeks was lower (53.4% vs 80.6%, p = 0.011) compared with twin pregnancies. Fetal weight was greater in singletons than in twins (2377.3 ± 862.1 vs 1630.3 ± 557.6, p < 0.001), but the fetal survival rate was similar. The proportion of twin gestations was significantly higher in the group with preterm delivery before 34 weeks (44.6% vs 18.2%, p = 0.011) and the proportion of previous term delivery was higher in the group with delivery at or after 34 weeks (30.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.039). The group with preterm delivery before 34 weeks had a significantly larger size of visible membranes at cerclage than the group with delivery at or after 34 weeks (2.23 ± 0.86 vs 1.64 ± 0.80, p = 0.001). In binary logistic regression analysis, twin gestations and a larger size of visible membranes were associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery.
CONCLUSION: The pregnancy outcome of emergency cerclage appears to have a better prognosis in singleton pregnancies than in twin pregnancies, and twin pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical incompetence; Emergency cerclage; Pregnancy outcome; Singleton pregnancy; Twin pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33386955     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05852-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  26 in total

1.  Births: Final Data for 2014.

Authors:  Brady E Hamilton; Joyce A Martin; Michelle J K Osterman; Sally C Curtin; T J Matthews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Cervical cerclage in the prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Rachael Simcox; Andrew Shennan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.237

3.  Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone.

Authors:  S M Althuisius; G A Dekker; P Hummel; D J Bekedam; H P van Geijn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data.

Authors:  V Berghella; A Ciardulli; O A Rust; M To; K Otsuki; S Althuisius; K H Nicolaides; A Roman; G Saccone
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes.

Authors:  George Daskalakis; Nikolaos Papantoniou; Spiros Mesogitis; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Births: Final Data for 2017.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll; Patrick Drake
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2018-11

7.  Emergency cerclage in twins during mid gestation may have favorable outcomes: Results of a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Isil Uzun Cilingir; Cenk Sayin; Havva Sutcu; Cihan İnan; Selen Erzincan; Cem Yener; Fusun Varol
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-08-23

8.  Pregnancy outcome after placement of 'rescue' Shirodkar cerclage.

Authors:  G Ventolini; T J Genrich; J Roth; R Neiger
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Emergency cerclage versus bed rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks. A retrospective, comparative study of 161 women.

Authors:  Jens H Stupin; Matthias David; Jan-Peter Siedentopf; Joachim W Dudenhausen
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone.

Authors:  Sietske M Althuisius; Gustaaf A Dekker; Pieter Hummel; Herman P van Geijn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.