Literature DB >> 19158805

Pregnancy outcome after placement of 'rescue' Shirodkar cerclage.

G Ventolini1, T J Genrich, J Roth, R Neiger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mid-trimester painless cervical dilation is associated with high rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. 'Rescue' cerclage is one option in managing these patients. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes of women in whom we placed Shirodkar cerclage. STUDY
DESIGN: We analyzed the pregnancy outcome of a retrospective cohort of women carrying singleton pregnancies who experienced late mid-trimester cervical dilation in whom we placed Shirodkar cerclage. Exclusion criteria were uterine contractions, bleeding, premature rupture of membranes and chorioamnionitis. Primary outcomes were gestational age at delivery, maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes and surgical complications. RESULT: Between January 2003 and December 2005, 68 patients met our inclusion criteria. The average maternal age was 26.4+/-8.3 years and the mean gestational age at the time of surgery was 19.6+/-3.2 weeks. Seven women opted for expectant management and 5 more were followed up by their referring physicians; the 12 of them were used as a comparison group. Fifty-six women underwent placement of Shirodkar cerclage. We were unable to place a cerclage in three women (5.1%) and all three delivered before 23 weeks. Of the 56 women who had cerclage, 14 (23.7%) delivered at term, 20 (33.9%) delivered between 34 and 36.9 weeks, 13 (22%) between 30 and 33.9 weeks, 6 (10.2%) between 24 and 29.9 weeks and 3 (5.1%) before 24 weeks. Median time from diagnosis to delivery was longer in the cerclage group (9.1 weeks) than in the comparison group (3.3 weeks P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: When pregnancies are complicated by late mid-trimester cervical dilation, placement of Shirodkar cerclage in appropriately selected patients has the potential to be a beneficial therapeutic option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19158805     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2008.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  12 in total

Review 1.  Tocolytics used as adjunctive therapy at the time of cerclage placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Smith; E A DeFranco
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  A comparison of pregnancy outcome of emergency modified transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed in twin and singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Minling Wei; Yang Yang; Xiaoying Jin; Jingyan Yang; Dong Huang; Songying Zhang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency.

Authors:  Kyung Joon Oh; Roberto Romero; Jee Yoon Park; JoonHo Lee; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Joon-Seok Hong; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Vaginal progesterone vs. cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix, previous preterm birth, and singleton gestation: a systematic review and indirect comparison metaanalysis.

Authors:  Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo da Fonseca; George Creasy; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The clinical significance of digital examination-indicated cerclage in women with a dilated cervix at 14 0/7-29 6/7 weeks.

Authors:  Hyun Sun Ko; Yun Seong Jo; Ki Cheol Kil; Ha Kyun Chang; Yong-Gyu Park; In Yang Park; Guisera Lee; Sajin Kim; Jong Chul Shin
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Patients with acute cervical insufficiency without intra-amniotic infection/inflammation treated with cerclage have a good prognosis.

Authors:  Max Mönckeberg; Rafael Valdés; Juan P Kusanovic; Manuel Schepeler; Jyh K Nien; Emiliano Pertossi; Pablo Silva; Karla Silva; Pía Venegas; Ulises Guajardo; Roberto Romero; Sebastián E Illanes
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.716

7.  Fetal, Infant and Maternal Outcomes among Women with Prolapsed Membranes Admitted before 29 Weeks Gestation.

Authors:  Julie E Robertson; Sarka Lisonkova; Tang Lee; Dane A De Silva; Peter von Dadelszen; Anne R Synnes; K S Joseph; Robert M Liston; Laura A Magee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prospective observational study of vaginal microbiota pre- and post-rescue cervical cerclage.

Authors:  R G Brown; D Chan; V Terzidou; Y S Lee; A Smith; J R Marchesi; D A MacIntyre; P R Bennett
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Emergency cerclage placement in multifetal pregnancies with a dilated cervix and exposed membranes: case series.

Authors:  Marijo Aguilera; Kirk Ramin; Ruby Nguyen; Lauren Giacobbe; Jessica Swartout
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2012-10-24

10.  Neutrophil elastase in amniotic fluid as a predictor of preterm birth after emergent cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Yuko Hatakeyama; Hiroshi Miura; Akira Sato; Yohei Onodera; Naoki Sato; Dai Shimizu; Yukiyo Kumazawa; Hiroyuki Sanada; Hideto Hirano; Yukihiro Terada
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.