Literature DB >> 30145272

Emergency cerclage in twins during mid gestation may have favorable outcomes: Results of a retrospective cohort.

Isil Uzun Cilingir1, Cenk Sayin2, Havva Sutcu2, Cihan İnan2, Selen Erzincan2, Cem Yener2, Fusun Varol2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cervical cerclage treatment for cervical changes at mid trimester is a very controversial topic in twins. The aim of the study was to present our maternal and fetal outcomes of mid-trimester cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies. BASIC PROCEDURES: This study was performed using data extracted from the medical files of the twin pregnancies whom performed emergency cervical cerclage between January 2012 and March 2018 at Trakya University, Facuty of Medicine, Department of Perinatology. MAIN
FINDINGS: Mean (min.-max.) gestational age at delivery was [27.3 (21-34) weeks]. The median time between cervical cerclage and delivery was 6.4 weeks, while the maximum prolongation of the pregnancy was 11 weeks. The median prolongation period of pregnancy was 4.1 weeks in patients with bulging membranes, but 10 weeks in patients with cervical effacement and cervical shortening. Eight infants died at the neonatal period. Two patients (20%) developed late abortions at 21 and 22 weeks of gestation, and 2 women (20%) delivered extremely premature neonates at the 24th weeks. Overall neonatal mortality rate was 40% (8/20 neonates). Twelve out of twenty were born alive (60%). PRINCIPAL
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of randomized controlled trials, it seems reasonable to offer emergency cervical cerclage to twin pregnancies with cervical shortening (<15mm). For the twin pregnancies with advanced cervical dilatation and protruding membranes, emergency cervical cerclage should be an option only for carefully selected patients after informing about the complications and low success rate.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency cerclage; Preterm birth; Prolapsed membranes; Short cervix; Twin pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145272     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod        ISSN: 2468-7847


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of pregnancy outcome of emergency modified transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed in twin and singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Minling Wei; Yang Yang; Xiaoying Jin; Jingyan Yang; Dong Huang; Songying Zhang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mian Pan; Jun Zhang; Wenqiang Zhan; Xia Ouyang; Xiaoxiang Jiang; Danlin Yang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Comparison of transvaginal cervical cerclage versus laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study from a single centre.

Authors:  Haiyan Yu; Xiaodong Wang; Guiqiong Huang; Chunyan Deng; Hua Liao; Qing Hu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  A Three-Step Procedure for Emergency Cerclage: Gestational and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Manuel Gómez-Castellano; Lorena Sabonet-Morente; Ernesto González-Mesa; Jesús S Jiménez-López
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.