OBJECTIVE: Health policy analysis remains surprisingly undeveloped in Australia given the power that policy exercises over the direction of public health. This paper describes the use of a policy analysis tool to evaluate the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes of principal chronic illness policy documents in New South Wales (NSW) from 1999 to 2008. In doing so, it demonstrates the utility of a set of predefined criteria for use in retrospective policy analysis and potential for use in reviewing policy proposals and making future health policies. METHODS: We analysed the major health policy for the care of people with chronic disease in NSW, the Chronic Care Program, using a modified set of existing criteria derived from the logic of events theoretical framework, which conceptualises the connection between policy determinants and outcomes. A document map was also developed to identify linkages between the policy documents analysed. RESULTS: Internal validity, the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes, was highest for policy background and goal-setting criteria, and lowest for accessibility, resources, public opportunities and monitoring and evaluation criteria. The use of document mapping was vital in determining linkages between the closely related policy documents of this complex initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The use of predefined criteria to identify in policy documents where policy statements are not consistent with intended outcomes, in conjunction with policy mapping, are useful methods of analysing complex policy initiatives. In the Australian context, the use of a validated policy-analysis tool might help achieve greater consistency. IMPLICATIONS: The use of a tool during policy development to identify in policy documents where statements are not consistent with intended outcomes may increase the likelihood of the successful implementation of future health policy. The tool can also assist those who make and review future policies.
OBJECTIVE: Health policy analysis remains surprisingly undeveloped in Australia given the power that policy exercises over the direction of public health. This paper describes the use of a policy analysis tool to evaluate the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes of principal chronic illness policy documents in New South Wales (NSW) from 1999 to 2008. In doing so, it demonstrates the utility of a set of predefined criteria for use in retrospective policy analysis and potential for use in reviewing policy proposals and making future health policies. METHODS: We analysed the major health policy for the care of people with chronic disease in NSW, the Chronic Care Program, using a modified set of existing criteria derived from the logic of events theoretical framework, which conceptualises the connection between policy determinants and outcomes. A document map was also developed to identify linkages between the policy documents analysed. RESULTS: Internal validity, the alignment between policy statements and intended outcomes, was highest for policy background and goal-setting criteria, and lowest for accessibility, resources, public opportunities and monitoring and evaluation criteria. The use of document mapping was vital in determining linkages between the closely related policy documents of this complex initiative. CONCLUSIONS: The use of predefined criteria to identify in policy documents where policy statements are not consistent with intended outcomes, in conjunction with policy mapping, are useful methods of analysing complex policy initiatives. In the Australian context, the use of a validated policy-analysis tool might help achieve greater consistency. IMPLICATIONS: The use of a tool during policy development to identify in policy documents where statements are not consistent with intended outcomes may increase the likelihood of the successful implementation of future health policy. The tool can also assist those who make and review future policies.
Authors: Aleksandra H Natora; Jennifer Oxley; Linda Barclay; Kelvin Taylor; Bruce Bolam; Terry P Haines Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Taraneh Yousefinezhadi; Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad; Mohammad Arab; Mozhdeh Ramezani; Ali Akbari Sari Journal: Iran J Public Health Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 1.429
Authors: Esther Suter; Sara Mallinson; Renee Misfeldt; Omenaa Boakye; Louise Nasmith; Sabrina T Wong Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Janice M Keefe; Laura Funk; Lucy Knight; Michelle Lobchuk; Marilyn Macdonald; Lori Mitchell; Julie Rempel; Grace Warner; Susan Stevens Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 2.655