Literature DB >> 33381577

Three-Dimensional-Printed Guiding Template for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Fei Gu1,2,3, Liangliang Li2,4, Huikang Zhang2,5, Xuxiang Li1,2, Chen Ling1,2, Liming Wang1,2, Qingqiang Yao1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), accurate alignment of the limb is crucial. This study is aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of a three-dimensional printed patient-customized guiding template (3DGT) for UKA.
METHODS: A total of 22 patients receiving UKA were randomly divided into the 3DGT-UKA group (n = 11) and traditional UKA group (T-UKA group; n = 11). In the 3DGT-UKA group, the line and angle of osteotomy were decided on a 3D image of the limb reconstructed from imaging data; a guiding template was then designed and printed out. The patients in the T-UKA group underwent conventional UKA. Prosthesis size, operation time, postoperative drainage, hip-knee angle (HKA), pain, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were recorded at day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 after surgery.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the size of prostheses between the preoperatively designed and actually used in the 3DGT-UKA group (p > 0.05). HKA was comparable in 3DGT-UKA and T-UKA patients. Operation time was shorter (53.6 ± 6.4 minutes vs. 75.8 ± 7.1 minutes) and wound drainage was less (93.2 ± 3.9 mL vs. 85.2 ± 3.0 mL) in 3DGT-UKA than in T-UKA (p < 0.05). Hospital stay was shorter in the 3DGT-UKA group. The 3DGT-UKA group had a lower VAS score on day 1, week 1, and month 1 and a higher HSS score on week 1 and month 1 after surgery. No varus/valgus deformity or prosthesis loosening was observed in either group at the final follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed patient-customized guiding template may help decrease operation time, decrease blood loss, and improve short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing UKA surgery.
Copyright © 2020 Fei Gu et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33381577      PMCID: PMC7765727          DOI: 10.1155/2020/7019794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.246


  20 in total

1.  Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ph Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Alignment of the femoral component in a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study in 10 cadaver femora.

Authors:  N P Kort; J J A M van Raay; B J W Thomassen
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Three-dimensional analysis of alignment error in using femoral intramedullary guides in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Burton Ma; William Long; John F Rudan; Randy E Ellis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Less invasive TKA: extramedullary femoral reference without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Paolo Adravanti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Julie Massfelder; Ramsay Refaie; Brice Rubens-Duval; Roch Mader; René Christopher Rouchy; Régis Pailhé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluations.

Authors:  F Voss; M B Sheinkop; J O Galante; R M Barden; A G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Comparative study of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty after opening wedge osteotomy versus after unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Pailhé; J Cognault; J Massfelder; A Sharma; R-C Rouchy; B Rubens-Duval; D Saragaglia
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Improved Survival of Computer-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: 252 Cases With a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

Authors:  Majid Chowdhry; Raghbir S Khakha; Mark Norris; Amin Kheiran; Sandeep K Chauhan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Importance of joint line preservation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis.

Authors:  Oh-Ryong Kwon; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Juhyun Son; Dong-Suk Suh; Changhyun Baek; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Meng Meng; Jinzuo Wang; Tianze Sun; Wentao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Liming Shu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.889

Review 2.  The Role of 3D Printing in Planning Complex Medical Procedures and Training of Medical Professionals-Cross-Sectional Multispecialty Review.

Authors:  Jarosław Meyer-Szary; Marlon Souza Luis; Szymon Mikulski; Agastya Patel; Finn Schulz; Dmitry Tretiakow; Justyna Fercho; Kinga Jaguszewska; Mikołaj Frankiewicz; Ewa Pawłowska; Radosław Targoński; Łukasz Szarpak; Katarzyna Dądela; Robert Sabiniewicz; Joanna Kwiatkowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.