Literature DB >> 28110847

Improved Survival of Computer-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: 252 Cases With a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

Majid Chowdhry1, Raghbir S Khakha1, Mark Norris1, Amin Kheiran1, Sandeep K Chauhan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an underutilized implant for medial tibiofemoral arthritis despite proven benefits in performance and reduced complications. This is likely related to registry recorded higher revision rates compared with total knee arthroplasty. It is our feeling that better component alignment resulting from the usage of computer-assisted surgery should improve longer-term functional results and survival of UKAs.
METHODS: Between August 2003 and June 2007, 265 medial UKAs were performed in 264 consecutive patients using navigation.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight women and 176 men with an average age of 51.7 (±4.63) years were assessed for function and survival over a follow-up period of 92.6 (63-120) months (7.7 years). The final survival rate over 5 years for this cohort was 97.6% at 5 years.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that computer-assisted UKA, to treat medial tibiofemoral joint arthritis, produces 5-year survival rates that are comparable with total knee arthroplasty. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alignment; computer navigation; medium-term survival; survival; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28110847     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Keteng Xu; Qun Chen; Qing Yan; Qin Wang; Jun Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  The trends in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: A statewide database study.

Authors:  Qais Naziri; Steven A Burekhovich; Patrick J Mixa; Robert Pivec; Jared M Newman; Neil V Shah; Preetesh D Patel; Akhilesh Sastry
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-05-03

Review 3.  Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty (RAKA): The Technique, the Technology and the Transition.

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Omkar S Sadigale; Prashant P Pawar; Ravi K Bashyal; Ajinkya Achalare; Murali Poduval
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Three-Dimensional-Printed Guiding Template for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fei Gu; Liangliang Li; Huikang Zhang; Xuxiang Li; Chen Ling; Liming Wang; Qingqiang Yao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-06

6.  Cruciate ligament force of knees following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is larger than the preoperative value.

Authors:  Kenichi Kono; Hiroshi Inui; Tetsuya Tomita; Darryl D D'Lima; Takaharu Yamazaki; Shoji Konda; Shuji Taketomi; Ryota Yamagami; Kohei Kawaguchi; Shin Sameshima; Tomofumi Kage; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.