Literature DB >> 25947901

Computer-assisted total knee replacement after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: medium-term results in a series of ninety cases.

Dominique Saragaglia1, Julie Massfelder2, Ramsay Refaie3, Brice Rubens-Duval4, Roch Mader5, René Christopher Rouchy6, Régis Pailhé7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results of total knee replacements (TKRs) after medial opening wedge valgising tibial osteotomy to those of primary TKR (TKR1). The hypothesis being that there would be no difference in results between these groups.
METHODS: Series 1 was made up of 45 TKRs after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MHTO)-30 men and ten women at an average age of 69 ± seven years (54-82). This was compared to a second series of TKR1s-30 men and ten women at an average age of 69 ± seven years (55-78). The average IKS scores were 91 ± 22.5 points (42-129) and 86 ± 18 points (38-116) in the two groups respectively. The average pre-operative HKA angle was 179 ± 5° (169-193°) in group 1, and 173 ± 7.5° (161-193°) in group 2. Tibial mechanical axes were 90.5 ± 4° (of which 24 knees had a valgus angle) and 85.05 ± 3.5° (79-93°) in the two groups respectively.
RESULTS: All patients were reviewed at an average follow-up of 47 ± 24.5 months for series 1 and 185 ± 8.5 months for series 2. The average IKS score was 184 ± 6 for series 1 (172-200) and 185 ± 8.5 (163-200) for series 2 (p = 0.872). Thirty-seven patients in series 1 and 38 patients in series 2 were either extremely satisfied or satisfied with the intervention. The average post-operative HKA angle was 180.5 ± 2.5° and 181 ± 2° (p = 0.122) and the average tibial mechanical axis was 89 ± 1.5° against 90 ± 1° (p = 0.001). The results of the 24 knees with a valgus tibial mechanical axis were statistically no different.
CONCLUSIONS: TKRs post medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy have identical results to primary TKRs even in knees with a valgus tibial mechanical axis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Navigation; Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy; Revision; Total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25947901     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2791-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

1.  Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy according to Wagner.

Authors:  Stefan Treuter; Alexander Schuh; Wolfgang Hönle; Mohamed Said Ismail; Thonse Narayana Chirag; Albert Fujak
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Total knee arthroplasty following medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy: technical issues early clinical radiological results.

Authors:  Sani Erak; Douglas Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Richard W McCalden; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Konstantinos J Kazakos; Christos Chatzipapas; Dionysios Verettas; Vasilios Galanis; Konstantinos C Xarchas; Ioannis Psillakis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Computer-assisted osteotomies for genu varum deformity: which osteotomy for which varus?

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Numa Mercier; Pierre-Emmanuel Colle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Outcome of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy augmented with a Biosorb® wedge and fixed with a plate and screws in 124 patients with a mean of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Marc Blaysat; Dominic Inman; Numa Mercier
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M M Katz; D S Hungerford; K A Krackow; D W Lennox
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  [Long-term survival rate of tibial osteotomies for valgus gonarthrosis].

Authors:  J Y Jenny; A Tavan; G Jenny; P Kehr
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1998-07

8.  Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. A comparison with a matched group.

Authors:  M A Mont; S Antonaides; K A Krackow; D S Hungerford
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Tom M van Raaij; Max Reijman; Andrea D Furlan; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The effect of high tibial osteotomy on the results of total knee arthroplasty: a matched case control study.

Authors:  Tom M van Raaij; Wouter Bakker; Max Reijman; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  6 in total

1.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with Anthony-K plate: prospective minimum five year follow-up data.

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Altay; Cemil Ertürk; Nuray Altay; Ahmet Şükrü Mercan; Serkan Sipahioğlu; Ali Murat Kalender; Uğur Erdem Işıkan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Survivorship of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy in the elderly: two to ten years of follow up.

Authors:  Pakpoom Ruangsomboon; Keerati Chareancholvanich; Thos Harnroongroj; Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Safety of simultaneous versus staged bilateral opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with locked plate and immediate weight bearing.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; David Giber; Arnaud Dubory; Jean Charles Auregan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Prospective comparative study of two methods for fixation after distal femur corrective osteotomy for valgus deformity; retrograde intramedullary nailing versus less invasive stabilization system plating.

Authors:  Çağrı Özcan; Sami Sökücü; Kubilay Beng; Engin Çetinkaya; Bilal Demir; Yavuz Selim Kabukçuoğlu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Three-Dimensional-Printed Guiding Template for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fei Gu; Liangliang Li; Huikang Zhang; Xuxiang Li; Chen Ling; Liming Wang; Qingqiang Yao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  Medial unicompartmental knee replacement is a viable treatment option after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claudio Legnani; Andrea Parente; Franco Parente; Alberto Ventura
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-08-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.