Literature DB >> 16520218

Three-dimensional analysis of alignment error in using femoral intramedullary guides in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Burton Ma1, William Long, John F Rudan, Randy E Ellis.   

Abstract

We used computerized simulations with 3-dimensional models of 20 cadaver femora, calculated from computed tomographic scans, and a model of a rod measuring 200 x 5 mm to study femoral alignment accuracy for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via minimally invasive reconstruction. The anatomical axis and insertion site were identified on each femur. A simulation of all feasible flexion-extension and varus-valgus orientations was performed. The average rod orientation was 3.2 degrees flexion and 2.5 degrees valgus. The range of orientation was 3.2 degrees extension to 9.7 degrees flexion and 4.5 degrees varus to 8.9 degrees valgus. The study suggests that a short narrow intramedullary rod inserted according to the manufacturer's specifications does not accurately find the anatomical axis and may lead to poor alignment of the femoral prosthesis. Given our finding of consistent bias toward excessive flexion and valgus alignment, we recommend that the operating surgeon carefully plan the insertion point of the intramedullary rod during surgery to compensate for this bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16520218     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Less invasive TKA: extramedullary femoral reference without navigation.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Paolo Adravanti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Computer-assisted FluoroGuide navigation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Burton Ma; John Rudan; Raja Chakravertty; Heather Grant
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Sagittal flexion angle of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is it same for both medial and lateral UKAs?

Authors:  Elcil Kaya Bicer; Elvire Servien; Sebastien Lustig; Guillaume Demey; Tarik Ait Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods.

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jens Schaumburger; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Hans-Robert Springorum; Anne-Maria Birkenbach; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Rotation of intramedullary alignment rods affects distal femoral cutting plane in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jan Matussek; Armin Keshmiri; Felix Greimel; Clemens Baier; Joachim Grifka; Hermann Maderbacher
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yihui Tu; Huaming Xue; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Hui Zhang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Three-Dimensional-Printed Guiding Template for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fei Gu; Liangliang Li; Huikang Zhang; Xuxiang Li; Chen Ling; Liming Wang; Qingqiang Yao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  Optimal Sagittal Insertion Depth and Direction of Femoral Intramedullary Rod in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Chinese Osteoarthritis Patients.

Authors:  Yong-Liang Ou; Ping-Yue Li; Hong Xia
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.