Literature DB >> 33729668

Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

Mark R Fox1, Rami Sweis2, Rena Yadlapati3, John Pandolfino4, Albis Hani5, Claudia Defilippi6, Tack Jan7, Nathalie Rommel8.   

Abstract

The Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high-resolution manometry (HRM). A key feature of CCv.4.0 is the more rigorous and expansive protocol that incorporates single wet swallows acquired in different positions (supine, upright) and provocative testing, including multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge. Additionally, solid bolus swallows, solid test meal, and/or pharmacologic provocation can be used to identify clinically relevant motility disorders and other conditions (eg, rumination) that occur during and after meals. The acquisition and analysis for performing these tests and the evidence supporting their inclusion in the Chicago Classification protocol is detailed in this technical review. Provocative tests are designed to increase the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of HRM studies for disorders of esophageal motility. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification, decrease the proportion of HRM studies that deliver inconclusive diagnoses and increase the number of patients with a clinically relevant diagnosis that can direct effective therapy. Another aim in establishing a standard manometry protocol for motility laboratories around the world is to facilitate procedural consistency, improve diagnostic reliability, and promote collaborative research.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33729668      PMCID: PMC8268048          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  60 in total

1.  Development of a topographic analysis system for manometric studies in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano; A Alrakawi
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Clinical measurement of gastrointestinal motility and function: who, when and which test?

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Peter J Kahrilas; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali; S Mark Scott; Satish S Rao; Jutta Keller; Michael Camilleri
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Rumination variations: aetiology and classification of abnormal behavioural responses to digestive symptoms based on high-resolution manometry studies.

Authors:  E Tucker; K Knowles; J Wright; M R Fox
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Variation in esophageal physiology testing in clinical practice: Results from an international survey.

Authors:  R Sweis; H Heinrich; M Fox
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  A comparison of esophageal motility in response to bread swallows and water swallows.

Authors:  B T Johnston; J S Collins; R J McFarland; J N Blackwell; A H Love
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; A J Bredenoord; M Fox; C P Gyawali; S Roman; A J P M Smout; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Impaired motility in Barrett's esophagus: A study using high-resolution manometry with physiologic challenge.

Authors:  S Sanagapalli; A Emmanuel; R Leong; S Kerr; L Lovat; R Haidry; M Banks; D Graham; A Raeburn; N Zarate-Lopez; R Sweis
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Lack of correlation between HRM metrics and symptoms during the manometric protocol.

Authors:  Yinglian Xiao; Peter J Kahrilas; Frédéric Nicodème; Zhiyue Lin; Sabine Roman; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  Nigel J Trudgill; Daniel Sifrim; Rami Sweis; Mark Fullard; Kumar Basu; Mimi McCord; Michael Booth; John Hayman; Guy Boeckxstaens; Brian T Johnston; Nicola Ager; John De Caestecker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Assessment of esophageal dysfunction and symptoms during and after a standardized test meal: development and clinical validation of a new methodology utilizing high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  R Sweis; A Anggiansah; T Wong; G Brady; M Fox
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.598

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Peroral Endoscopy Myotomy (POEM) for Esophageal Motility Disorders.

Authors:  Dylan Olson; Kevin C Liu; Aziz Aadam
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2022-08-10

Review 2.  Esophageal Dysfunction in Post-lung Transplant: An Enigma.

Authors:  Aditya V Jadcherla; Kevin Litzenberg; Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.733

3.  British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) joint consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults.

Authors:  Anjan Dhar; Hasan N Haboubi; Stephen E Attwood; Marcus K H Auth; Jason M Dunn; Rami Sweis; Danielle Morris; Jenny Epstein; Marco R Novelli; Hannah Hunter; Amanda Cordell; Sharon Hall; Jamal O Hayat; Kapil Kapur; Andrew Robert Moore; Carol Read; Sarmed S Sami; Paul J Turner; Nigel J Trudgill
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 31.793

Review 4.  A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans.

Authors:  Tarini V Ullal; Stanley L Marks; Peter C Belafsky; Jeffrey L Conklin; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 5.  Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Rena Yadlapati; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 33.883

6.  How Updates in Chicago Classification Impact Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Foregut (Thousand Oaks)       Date:  2021-08-20

7.  Automated Chicago Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorder Diagnosis Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Teodora Surdea-Blaga; Gheorghe Sebestyen; Zoltan Czako; Anca Hangan; Dan Lucian Dumitrascu; Abdulrahman Ismaiel; Liliana David; Imre Zsigmond; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Corneliu Leucuta; Stefan Lucian Popa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.847

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.