Literature DB >> 33369014

Evaluation of technical performance of optical surface imaging system using conventional and novel stereotactic radiosurgery algorithms.

Hironori Kojima1,2, Akihiro Takemura3, Shogo Kurokawa4, Shinichi Ueda1, Kimiya Noto1, Haruna Yokoyama1,2, Shigeyuki Takamatsu5.   

Abstract

The Catalyst HD (C-RAD Positioning AB, Uppsala, Sweden) optical surface imaging (OSI) system is able to manage interfractional patient positioning, intrafractional motion monitoring, and non-contact respiratory gating without x-ray exposure for radiation therapy. In recent years, a novel high-precision surface registration algorithm for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS algorithm) has been released. This study aimed to evaluate the technical performance of the OSI system using rigid phantoms, by comparing the conventional and SRS algorithms. To determine the system's technical performance, isocenter displacements were calculated by surface image registration via the OSI system using head, thorax, and pelvis rigid phantoms. The reproducibility of positioning was evaluated by the mean value calculated by repeating the registration 10 times, without moving each phantom. The accuracy of positioning was evaluated by the mean value of the residual error, where the 10 offset values given to each phantom were subtracted from the isocenter displacement values. The stability of motion monitoring was evaluated by measuring isocenter drift during 20 min and averaging it over 10 measurements. For the head phantom, all tests were compared with the mask types and algorithms. As a result, for all sites and both algorithms, the reproducibility, accuracy, and stability for translation and rotation were <0.1 mm and <0.1°, <1.0 mm and <1.0°, and <0.1 mm and <0.1°, respectively. In particular, the SRS algorithm had a small absolute error and standard deviation of calculated isocenter displacement, and a significantly higher reproducibility and accuracy than the conventional algorithm (P < 0.01). There was no difference in the stability between the algorithms (P = 0.0280). The SRS algorithm was found to be suitable for the treatment of rigid body sites with less deformation and small area, such as the head and face.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  optical surface imaging system; positioning; registration; stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT)

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33369014      PMCID: PMC7882109          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  9 in total

1.  A phantom evaluation of Sentinel(™), a commercial laser/camera surface imaging system for patient setup verification in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Stefania Pallotta; Livia Marrazzo; Marco Ceroti; Pierfrancesco Silli; Marta Bucciolini
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a HexaPOD robot treatment table.

Authors:  Jürgen Meyer; Jürgen Wilbert; Kurt Baier; Matthias Guckenberger; Anne Richter; Otto Sauer; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  The Role of Optical Surface Imaging Systems in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Jeremy D P Hoisak; Todd Pawlicki
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  An accuracy assessment of different rigid body image registration methods and robotic couch positional corrections using a novel phantom.

Authors:  Sankar Arumugam; Michael G Jameson; Aitang Xing; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Frame-less and mask-less cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Laura I Cerviño; Todd Pawlicki; Joshua D Lawson; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A novel surface imaging system for patient positioning and surveillance during radiotherapy. A phantom study and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  F Stieler; F Wenz; M Shi; F Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Evaluation of daily patient positioning for radiotherapy with a commercial 3D surface-imaging system (Catalyst™).

Authors:  F Walter; P Freislederer; C Belka; C Heinz; M Söhn; F Roeder
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  The potential of an optical surface tracking system in non-coplanar single isocenter treatments of multiple brain metastases.

Authors:  Ans C C Swinnen; Michel C Öllers; Chin Loon Ong; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Optical Surface Scanning for Patient Positioning in Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Analysis of 1902 Fractions.

Authors:  G Carl; D Reitz; S Schönecker; M Pazos; P Freislederer; M Reiner; F Alongi; M Niyazi; U Ganswindt; C Belka; S Corradini
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor-mounted kV X-ray image-guided radiation therapy system.

Authors:  Kanako Sakuragawa; Motoharu Sasaki; Takeshi Kamomae; Michihiro Yokoishi; Ryosuke Kasai; Akimi Kajino; Hitoshi Ikushima
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.