Literature DB >> 33369002

Lower limit of iron quantification using dual-energy CT - a phantom study.

Xia Jiang1, David E Hintenlang1, Richard D White1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been proposed for quantification of hepatic iron concentration (IC). However, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) has not been established, limiting the clinical adoption of this technology. In this study, we aim to (a) establish the LLOQ using phantoms and (b) investigate the effects of patient size, dose level, energy combination, and reconstruction method.
METHODS: Three phantom sizes and eight vials of ferric nitrate solution with IC ranging from 0 to 10 mg/ml were used. DECT scans were performed at 80/140 and 100/140Sn kVp, and using five different levels of CT dose index (CTDI). An image-domain three-material-decomposition algorithm was used to calculate the IC. The LLOQ was determined based on the coefficient of variation from repeated measurements.
RESULTS: The measured IC correlated strongly with the true IC in the small and medium phantoms (R2 of linear regression > 0.99) and moderately in the large phantom (0.8 < R2 <0.9). The LLOQ improved with increased CTDI. At 30 mGy, the LLOQ was found to be 0.50/1.73/6.25 mg/ml in the small/medium/large phantoms, respectively. 80/140Sn kVp resulted in superior LLOQ for all phantom sizes compared to 100/140Sn kVp, primarily due to the difference in their iron enhancement ratios (1.94 and 1.55, respectively). Iterative reconstruction was found to further improve the LLOQ (by ~ 11%), whereas reconstruction kernel smoothness had negligible effect. The LLOQ of iron was significantly higher than that of iodine due to its lack of a useful k-edge and lower enhancement ratio.
CONCLUSION: Iron quantification at clinically important levels was achieved in a small- and a medium-sized phantom using DECT, but proved challenging in a large phantom. Wide spectral separation and accurate calibration were found to be critical to the success of the technology.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual-energy CT; iron overload; lower limit of quantification; three-material-decomposition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33369002      PMCID: PMC7856509          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  21 in total

1.  Feasibility and accuracy of dual-source dual-energy CT for noninvasive determination of hepatic iron accumulation.

Authors:  Eugene Joe; Se Hyung Kim; Kyoung Bun Lee; Ja-June Jang; Jae Young Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Retrospective comparison of gradient recalled echo R2* and spin-echo R2 magnetic resonance analysis methods for estimating liver iron content in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Robert J Fleck; Charles T Quinn; Bin Zhang; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  Quantification of liver iron content with CT-added value of dual-energy.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Caecilia S Reiner; Dimitri Raptis; Olivio Donati; Robert Goetti; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A quantitative theory of the Hounsfield unit and its application to dual energy scanning.

Authors:  R A Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Size-specific Dose Estimates for Chest, Abdominal, and Pelvic CT: Effect of Intrapatient Variability in Water-equivalent Diameter.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Maria Shiung; Xinhui Duan; Lifeng Yu; Yi Zhang; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Dual-Energy CT for Patients Suspected of Having Liver Iron Overload: Can Virtual Iron Content Imaging Accurately Quantify Liver Iron Content?

Authors:  Xian Fu Luo; Xue Qian Xie; Shu Cheng; Yi Yang; Jing Yan; Huan Zhang; Wei Min Chai; Bernhard Schmidt; Fu Hua Yan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  Estimating tissue iron burden: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  John C Wood
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Liquid tissue surrogates for X-ray and CT phantom studies.

Authors:  Paul F FitzGerald; Robert E Colborn; Peter M Edic; Jack W Lambert; Peter J Bonitatibus; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dual-Energy CT: Lower Limits of Iodine Detection and Quantification.

Authors:  Megan C Jacobsen; Erik N K Cressman; Eric P Tamm; Dodge L Baluya; Xinhui Duan; Dianna D Cody; Dawid Schellingerhout; Rick R Layman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 29.146

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative dual-energy CT techniques in the abdomen.

Authors:  Giuseppe V Toia; Achille Mileto; Carolyn L Wang; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-09-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.