Suraj D Serai1, Robert J Fleck2, Charles T Quinn3, Bin Zhang4, Daniel J Podberesky5. 1. Department of Radiology, MLC 5031, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. suraj.serai@cchmc.org. 2. Department of Radiology, MLC 5031, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. 3. Division of Hematology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. 4. Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Nemours Children's Health System Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serial surveillance of liver iron concentration (LIC) provides guidance for chelation therapy in patients with iron overload. The diagnosis of iron overload traditionally relies on core liver biopsy, which is limited by invasiveness, sampling error, cost and general poor acceptance by pediatric patients and parents. Thus noninvasive diagnostic methods such as MRI are highly attractive for quantification of liver iron concentration. OBJECTIVE: To compare two MRI-based methods for liver iron quantification in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 64 studies on 48 children and young adults (age range 4-21 years) were examined by gradient recalled echo (GRE) R2* and spin-echo R2 MRI at 1.5T to evaluate liver iron concentration. Scatter plots and Bland-Altman difference plots were generated to display and assess the relationship between the methods. RESULTS: With the protocols used in this investigation, Bland-Altman agreement between the methods is best when LIC is <20 mg/g dry tissue. Scatter plots show that all values with LIC <20 mg/g dry tissue fall within the 95% prediction limits. CONCLUSION: Liver iron concentration as determined by the R2* and R2 MR methods is statistically comparable, with no statistical difference between these methods for LIC <20 mg/g.
BACKGROUND: Serial surveillance of liver iron concentration (LIC) provides guidance for chelation therapy in patients with iron overload. The diagnosis of iron overload traditionally relies on core liver biopsy, which is limited by invasiveness, sampling error, cost and general poor acceptance by pediatric patients and parents. Thus noninvasive diagnostic methods such as MRI are highly attractive for quantification of liver iron concentration. OBJECTIVE: To compare two MRI-based methods for liver iron quantification in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 64 studies on 48 children and young adults (age range 4-21 years) were examined by gradient recalled echo (GRE) R2* and spin-echo R2 MRI at 1.5T to evaluate liver iron concentration. Scatter plots and Bland-Altman difference plots were generated to display and assess the relationship between the methods. RESULTS: With the protocols used in this investigation, Bland-Altman agreement between the methods is best when LIC is <20 mg/g dry tissue. Scatter plots show that all values with LIC <20 mg/g dry tissue fall within the 95% prediction limits. CONCLUSION: Liver iron concentration as determined by the R2* and R2 MR methods is statistically comparable, with no statistical difference between these methods for LIC <20 mg/g.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescents; Chelation therapy; Children; Iron concentration; Liver; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Daniel B Wallihan; Daniel J Podberesky; Bradley S Marino; Joshua S Sticka; Suraj Serai Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: P Mazza; R Giua; S De Marco; M G Bonetti; B Amurri; C Masi; G Lazzari; C Rizzo; M Cervellera; A Peluso Journal: Haematologica Date: 1995 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Andrea Agostini; Moritz F Kircher; Richard K G Do; Alessandra Borgheresi; Serena Monti; Andrea Giovagnoni; Lorenzo Mannelli Journal: Semin Roentgenol Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 0.800
Authors: Ralf B Loeffler; M Beth McCarville; Anne W Wagstaff; Matthew P Smeltzer; Axel J Krafft; Ruitian Song; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-10-17