Literature DB >> 25880263

Dual-Energy CT for Patients Suspected of Having Liver Iron Overload: Can Virtual Iron Content Imaging Accurately Quantify Liver Iron Content?

Xian Fu Luo1, Xue Qian Xie1, Shu Cheng1, Yi Yang1, Jing Yan1, Huan Zhang1, Wei Min Chai1, Bernhard Schmidt1, Fu Hua Yan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the feasibility of using virtual iron content (VIC) imaging at dual-energy computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the liver iron content (LIC) in patients suspected of having liver iron overload and to compare the LIC grading performance of VIC imaging and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Fifty-six patients suspected of having liver iron overload (serum ferritin concentrations >500 μg/L) underwent unenhanced dual-energy CT and MR imaging of the liver. MR imaging-measured LICs were obtained in 34 of the 56 patients. VIC images were generated with dual-energy analysis. R2* and MR-measured LIC were obtained with gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences, respectively. Correlations between CT and MR measurements were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of VIC and R2* in the differentiation of different LIC thresholds were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: Hepatic VIC showed significant correlation with R2* and MR-measured LIC (r = 0.885 and 0.871, respectively; P < .0001). To differentiate among different LIC thresholds of 1.8, 3.2, 7.0, and 15.0 mg of iron per gram of dry tissue, the corresponding optimal cutoff values for VIC were 2.50, 5.13, 8.93, and 17.97 HU, respectively. At a LIC threshold of 7.0 mg of iron per gram of dry tissue or higher, 100% sensitivity (15 of 15 patients) and 100% specificity (19 of 19 patients) were obtained for VIC. There was no significant difference between VIC and R2* (area under the ROC curve, 0.964 vs 0.993, respectively; P = .299) in grading LIC levels at a LIC threshold of 3.2 mg of iron per gram of dry tissue or higher. Conclusion Hepatic VIC is a potential index for accurately evaluating and grading clinically significant liver iron accumulation, with a diagnostic performance similar to that of MR imaging. (©) RSNA, 2015 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25880263     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015141856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  Single- and dual-energy CT of the abdomen: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Andrew D Hardie; U Joseph Schoepf; Lloyd M Felmly; Jonathan D Perry; Akos Varga-Szemes; Stefanie Mangold; Damiano Caruso; Christian Canstein; Thomas J Vogl; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Dual-energy CT for liver iron quantification in patients with haematological disorders.

Authors:  Sebastian Werner; Bernhard Krauss; Ulrike Haberland; Malte Bongers; Uwe Starke; Tamam Bakchoul; Sigrid Enkel; Konstantin Nikolaou; Marius Horger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Dual-energy CT: theoretical principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Agostini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Alberto Mari; Chiara Floridi; Federico Bruno; Marina Carotti; Nicolò Schicchi; Antonio Barile; Stefania Maggi; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Quantitative dual-energy CT techniques in the abdomen.

Authors:  Giuseppe V Toia; Achille Mileto; Carolyn L Wang; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 5.  Opportunities for new CT contrast agents to maximize the diagnostic potential of emerging spectral CT technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Paul F FitzGerald; Peter M Edic; Jack W Lambert; Robert E Colborn; Michael E Marino; Paul M Evans; Jeannette C Roberts; Zhen J Wang; Margaret J Wong; Peter J Bonitatibus
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Dual-energy CT in diffuse liver disease: is there a role?

Authors:  Khaled Y Elbanna; Bahar Mansoori; Achille Mileto; Patrik Rogalla; Luís S Guimarães
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-08

7.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping in combination with water-fat separation for simultaneous liver iron and fat fraction quantification.

Authors:  Huimin Lin; Hongjiang Wei; Naying He; Caixia Fu; Shu Cheng; Jun Shen; Baisong Wang; Xu Yan; Chunlei Liu; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The influence of liver fat deposition on the quantification of the liver-iron fraction using fast-kilovolt-peak switching dual-energy CT imaging and material decomposition technique: an in vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Tingting Xie; Yongbin Li; Guanyong He; Zhen Zhang; Qiao Shi; Guanxun Cheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-04

9.  Simultaneous hepatic iron and fat quantification with dual-energy CT in a rabbit model of coexisting iron and fat.

Authors:  Yun Peng; Jing Ye; Chang Liu; Hongru Jia; Jun Sun; Jun Ling; Martin Prince; Chang Li; Xianfu Luo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

10.  Investigating Dual-Energy CT Post-Contrast Phases for Liver Iron Quantification: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Luca Basso; Dario Baldi; Lorenzo Mannelli; Carlo Cavaliere; Marco Salvatore; Valentina Brancato
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.