Literature DB >> 28538491

Committee Opinion No. 701 Summary: Choosing The Route Of Hysterectomy For Benign Disease.

.   

Abstract

Hysterectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the United States. Selection of the route of hysterectomy for benign causes can be influenced by the size and shape of the vagina and uterus; accessibility to the uterus; extent of extrauterine disease; the need for concurrent procedures; surgeon training and experience; average case volume; available hospital technology, devices, and support; whether the case is emergent or scheduled; and preference of the informed patient. Vaginal and laparoscopic procedures are considered "minimally invasive" surgical approaches because they do not require a large abdominal incision and, thus, typically are associated with shortened hospitalization and postoperative recovery times compared with open abdominal hysterectomy. Minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy should be performed, whenever feasible, based on their well-documented advantages over abdominal hysterectomy. The vaginal approach is preferred among the minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a preferable alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom a vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. Although minimally invasive approaches to hysterectomy are the preferred route, open abdominal hysterectomy remains an important surgical option for some patients. The obstetrician-gynecologist should discuss the options with patients and make clear recommendations on which route of hysterectomy will maximize benefits and minimize risks given the specific clinical situation. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the approaches to hysterectomy should be discussed in the context of the patient's values and preferences, and the patient and health care provider should together determine the best course of action after this discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28538491     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

1.  Adnexectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Emily A Slopnick; David D Sheyn; Graham C Chapman; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Sharif El-Nashar; Adonis K Hijaz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Society of gynecologic oncology future of physician payment reform task force: Lessons learned in developing and implementing surgical alternative payment models.

Authors:  Margaret I Liang; Emeline M Aviki; Jason D Wright; Laura J Havrilesky; Leslie R Boyd; Haley A Moss; Elizabeth L Jewell; David E Cohn; Sachin M Apte; Patrick F Timmins; Ronald D Alvarez; Jill Rathbun; Elizabeth Lipinski; Susan White; Dorimar Siverio-Minardi; Emily M Ko
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Validation of Transvaginal Hysterectomy Surgical Model - Modification of the Flowerpot Model to Improve Vesicovaginal Plane Simulation.

Authors:  Linda S Burkett; Jennifer Makin; Mary Ackenbom; Amanda Artsen; Megan Bradley
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.314

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.