Literature DB >> 29794686

Predicting Performance and Non-Use in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.

Marc J W Lammers1,2, Huib Versnel1,2, Vedat Topsakal3,4, Gijsbert A van Zanten1,2, Wilko Grolman1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze postoperative hearing performance and independent predictors of speech perception and to assess cochlear implant nonuse in adults with prelingual deafness who received an implant during adulthood.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study including all prelingually deaf adults who received a cochlear implant at the University Medical Center Utrecht between 2000 and 2013.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Included were a total of 48 prelingually deaf patients diagnosed with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss before the age of 2 years who received their implants during adulthood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative monosyllabic word and sentence recognition scores.
RESULTS: The average maximum postoperative monosyllabic word score for all subjects was 25% correct. Preoperative speech perception and the extent of preoperative residual hearing were both positive independent predictors of postoperative speech recognition, explaining 47% of the variance. Almost half of the population experienced only little (27%) or no benefit (21%) of their implants in daily communication. These patients were more likely to have either no or only low-frequency residual hearing. Eventually, all subjects without any benefit became non-user.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative performance of adult, prelingually deaf cochlear implant candidates, with long-term deafness is dependent on their preoperative speech perception and residual hearing. Candidates who have negligible residual hearing are expected to have no or only limited postoperative benefit of their implants and are at risk of becoming nonusers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794686     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas; Andreas Loth; Thomas Zahnert; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult Patients.

Authors:  Ghizlene Lahlou; Hannah Daoudi; Evelyne Ferrary; Huan Jia; Marion De Bergh; Yann Nguyen; Olivier Sterkers; Isabelle Mosnier
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.