Literature DB >> 27160793

Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.

Alexandra Rousset1,2,3, Richard Dowell1,2,3, Jaime Leigh1,2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated outcomes and predictive factors, specifically language skills, for a group of prelingually hearing-impaired adults who received a cochlear implant.
DESIGN: Speech perception data, demographic information, and other related variables such as communication mode, residual hearing, and receptive language abilities were explored. Pre- and post-implant speech perception scores were compared and multiple regression analysis was used to identify significant predictive relationships. STUDY SAMPLE: The study included 43 adults with a prelingual onset of hearing loss, who proceeded with cochlear implantation at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
RESULTS: The majority of patients experienced benefit from their cochlear implants, with 88% demonstrating significant improvement in speech perception performance. Volunteers achieved better post-operative speech perception scores if they had a shorter duration of severe-to-profound hearing loss, better language skills, and used an exclusively oral communication mode.
CONCLUSIONS: Although post-operative speech perception performance is significantly poorer for prelingually hearing-impaired adults compared to postlingually hearing-impaired patients, the study group demonstrated significant benefit from their cochlear implants. The variability in post-operative outcomes can be predicted to some extent from the hearing history and language abilities of the individual patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implants; outcomes; prelingual hearing loss; receptive language

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27160793     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2016.1157269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  6 in total

1.  Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults: A Detailed Analysis of Auditory and Self-Perceived Benefits.

Authors:  Joke Debruyne; Miranda Janssen; Jan Brokx
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Stefan Dazert; Jan Peter Thomas; Andreas Loth; Thomas Zahnert; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Deficient Recurrent Cortical Processing in Congenital Deafness.

Authors:  Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf; Aly Lamuri; Peter Hubka; Jochen Tillein; Martin Vinck; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-25

4.  Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult Patients.

Authors:  Ghizlene Lahlou; Hannah Daoudi; Evelyne Ferrary; Huan Jia; Marion De Bergh; Yann Nguyen; Olivier Sterkers; Isabelle Mosnier
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Long-Term Deafness.

Authors:  Attila Ovari; Lisa Hühnlein; David Nguyen-Dalinger; Daniel Fabian Strüder; Christoph Külkens; Oliver Niclaus; Jens Eduard Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Meta-Analysis-Correlation between Spiral Ganglion Cell Counts and Speech Perception with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Yew-Song Cheng; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-05-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.