| Literature DB >> 33354565 |
Jian-Qin Xie1,2,3, Ya-Peng Lu1,3, Hong-Li Sun1,3, Li-Na Gao2,3, Pei-Pei Song2,3, Zhi-Jun Feng3, Chong-Ge You2,3.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke (IS) greatly threatens human health resulting in high mortality and substantial loss of function. Recent studies have shown that the outcome of IS has sex specific, but its mechanism is still unclear. This study is aimed at identifying the sexually dimorphic to peripheral immune response in IS progression, predicting potential prognostic biomarkers that can lead to sex-specific outcome, and revealing potential treatment targets. Gene expression dataset GSE37587, including 68 peripheral whole blood samples which were collected within 24 hours from known onset of symptom and again at 24-48 hours after onset (20 women and 14 men), was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. First, using Bioconductor R package, two kinds of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (nonsex-specific- and sex-specific-DEGs) were screened by follow-up (24-48 hours) vs. baseline (24 hours). 30 nonsex-specific DEGs (1 upregulated and 29 downregulated), 79 female-specific DEGs (25 upregulated and 54 downregulated), and none of male-specific DEGs were obtained finally. Second, bioinformatics analysis of female-specific DEGs was performed. Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation analysis shows that DEGs were mainly enriched in translational initiation, cytosolic ribosome, and structural constituent of ribosome. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis shows that the top 6 enrichment pathways are ribosome, nuclear factor--kappa B (NF-kappa B) signaling pathway, apoptosis, mineral absorption, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and pertussis. Three functional modules were clustered in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs. The top 10 key genes of the PPI network constructed were selected, including RPS14, RPS15A, RPS24, FAU, RPL27, RPL31, RPL34, RPL35A, RSL24D1, and EEF1B2. Sex difference of ribosome in stroke-induced peripheral immunosuppression may be the potential mechanism of sex disparities in outcome after IS, and women are more likely to have stroke-induced immunosuppression. RPS14, RPS15A, RPS24, FAU, RPL27, RPL31, RPL34, RPL35A, RSL24D1, and EEF1B2 may be novel prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for IS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33354565 PMCID: PMC7735851 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3650935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Nonsex- and sex-specific DEGs.
| DEGs | Regulated | Gene symbol |
|---|---|---|
| Nonsex-specific | Upregulated |
|
| Downregulated |
| |
| Female-specific | Upregulated |
|
| Downregulated |
| |
| Male-specific | Upregulated | None |
| Downregulated | None |
Abbreviation: DEGs: differentially expressed genes. Note: C15orf15 is also known as RSL24D1.
Figure 1The coexpression distribution of female-specific and nonsex-specific DEGs. Red A represents female-specific DEGs. Green B represents nonsex-specific DEGs. DEGs: differentially expressed genes.
Figure 2Female-specific differential expression of data between follow-up and baseline. The red points represent upregulated DEGs with log2 FC > 0.6 and adjusted p value <0.05. The blue points represent downregulated DEGs with log2 FC < −0.6 and adjusted p value <0.05. The green points represent DEGs with ∣log2 FC | >1 and adjusted p value <0.05. The grey points represent genes with ∣log2 FC | <0.6. The gene symbols of the DEGs are marked in orange. C15orf15 is also known as RSL24D1. DEGs: differentially expressed genes; FC: fold change.
Figure 3Cluster heatmap of the female-specific DEGs. Red indicates upregulation of gene expression. Blue indicates downregulation of gene expression. White indicates no significant change in gene expression. C15orf15 is also known as RSL24D1.
Enriched GO terms of female-specific DEGs.
| Category | ID | Term | Gene ratio |
|
|
| Gene |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | 0006413 | Translational initiation | 10/73 | 3.90 | 3.80 | 3.63 |
|
| BP | 0006614 | SRP-dependent cotranslational protein targeting to membrane | 8/73 | 7.59 | 3.80 | 3.63 |
|
| BP | 0006613 | Cotranslational protein targeting to membrane | 8/73 | 1.02 | 3.80 | 3.63 |
|
| BP | 0000184 | Nuclear-transcribed mRNA catabolic process, nonsense-mediated decay | 8/73 | 2.18 | 4.62 | 4.41 |
|
| BP | 0072599 | Establishment of protein localization to endoplasmic reticulum | 8/73 | 2.49 | 4.62 | 4.41 |
|
| BP | 0019080 | Viral gene expression | 9/73 | 5.61 | 8.95 | 8.54 |
|
| BP | 0019083 | Viral transcription | 8/73 | 4.43 | 4.49 | 4.29 |
|
| CC | 0022626 | Cytosolic ribosome | 9/74 | 3.61 | 6.28 | 5.81 |
|
| CC | 0044445 | Cytosolic part | 9/74 | 3.57 | 1.55 | 1.44 |
|
| MF | 0003735 | Structural constituent of ribosome | 9/73 | 1.42 | 2.54 | 2.45 |
|
Abbreviation: BP: biological process; CC: cellular component; MF: molecular function.
Figure 4GO enrichment analysis of female-specific DEGs. (a) Gene count in biological process, cell component, and molecular function. (b) GO enrichment significance terms of female-specific DEGs in different functional groups.
Figure 5Distribution of female-specific DEGs in different GO enrichment functions.
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of female-specific DEGs.
| ID | Description | Gene ratio | BgRatio |
|
| Genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hsa03010 | Ribosome | 10/41 | 153/8016 | 3.23 | 3.48 |
|
| hsa04064 | NF-kappa B signaling pathway | 3/41 | 102/8016 | 0.015027 | 0.54667 |
|
| hsa04210 | Apoptosis | 3/41 | 136/8016 | 0.031862 | 0.54667 |
|
| hsa04978 | Mineral absorption | 2/41 | 58/8016 | 0.035231 | 0.54667 |
|
| hsa04932 | Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) | 3/41 | 149/8016 | 0.040123 | 0.54667 |
|
| hsa05133 | Pertussis | 2/41 | 76/8016 | 0.057363 | 0.54667 |
|
Figure 6The top six enriched pathways with the highest rich factor of female-specific DEGs. Rich factor is equal to the gene count enriched into the pathway versus the total of genes contained in the pathway.
Figure 7Significant pathway enrichment of female-specific DEGs. Yellow represents the signaling pathway, red represents the upregulated gene, and blue represents the downregulated gene. NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Figure 8(a) PPI network of female-specific DEGs. (b) Three functional modules. Red represents the cluster 1 with score 12.167, 13 nodes, and 73 edges. Green represents the cluster 2 with score 3, 3 nodes, and 3 edges. Yellow represents the cluster 3 with score 3, 3 nodes, and 3 edges. CXCL8 is also known as IL8.
Top 10 key genes in the PPI network of the female-specific DEGs ranked by MCC method.
| Rank | Gene symbol | Gene description | MCC score | Log2 FC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Ribosomal protein S15a | 4354708 | -0.83625 |
| 2 |
| Ribosomal protein S14 | 4354704 | -0.63886 |
| 3 |
| Ribosomal protein L27 | 4354680 | -0.84896 |
| 3 |
| Ribosomal protein L35a | 4354680 | -0.68986 |
| 5 |
| FAU ubiquitin like and ribosomal protein S30 fusion | 4354584 | -0.72147 |
| 5 |
| Ribosomal protein S24 | 4354584 | -0.81476 |
| 7 |
| Ribosomal protein L31 | 4354560 | -1.0045 |
| 7 |
| Ribosomal protein L34 | 4354560 | -0.82663 |
| 9 |
| Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 beta 2 | 3991683 | -0.82928 |
| 10 |
| Ribosomal L24 domain containing 1 | 3628802 | -1.0838 |
Figure 9Top 10 key genes in the PPI network of the female-specific DEGs.
Figure 10The expression of key genes in female IS patients based on follow-up vs. baseline.
Figure 11The mechanism of the cluster 3 DEGs in stroke-induced apoptosis and immunosuppression (created with http://BioRender.com/).