Literature DB >> 33336931

Antimicrobial Resistance on Farms: A Review Including Biosecurity and the Potential Role of Disinfectants in Resistance Selection.

Robert Davies1, Andrew Wales2.   

Abstract

Resistance to therapeutic antimicrobial agents is recognized as a growing problem for both human and veterinary medicine, and the need to address the issue in both of these linked domains is a current priority in public policy. Efforts to limit antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on farms have so far focused on control of the supply and use of antimicrobial drugs, plus husbandry measures to reduce infectious disease. In the United Kingdom and some other countries, substantial progress has been made recently against targets on agricultural antimicrobial drug use. However, evidence suggests that resistant pathogenic and commensal bacteria can persist and spread within and between premises despite declining or zero antimicrobial drug use. Reasons for this are likely complex and varied but may include: bacterial adaptations to ameliorate fitness costs associated with maintenance and replication of resistance genes and associated proteins, horizontal transmission of genetic resistance determinants between bacteria, physical transfer of bacteria via movement (of animals, workers, and equipment), ineffective cleaning and disinfection, and co-selection of resistance to certain drugs by use of other antimicrobials, heavy metals, or biocides. Areas of particular concern for public health include extended-spectrum cephalosporinases and fluoroquinolone resistance among Enterobacteriaceae, livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and the emergence of transmissible colistin resistance. Aspects of biosecurity have repeatedly been identified as risk factors for the presence of AMR on farm premises, but there are large gaps in our understanding of the most important risk factors and the most effective interventions. The present review aims to summarize the present state of knowledge in this area, from a European perspective.
© 2019 Institute of Food Technologists®.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial; biosecurity; hygiene; livestock; resistance

Year:  2019        PMID: 33336931     DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf        ISSN: 1541-4337            Impact factor:   12.811


  22 in total

1.  Fast Synthesis of Graphene Oxide-β-Lactam as a Residue-Free Environmental Bacterial Inhibitor.

Authors:  Chenyan Hu; Pengfei Heng; Yuanyuan Zeng; Qing Zhang; Meilian Zhao; Zhongzhu Yang; Yang He
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Genome-associations of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing (ESBL) or AmpC producing E. coli in small and medium pig farms from Khon Kaen province, Thailand.

Authors:  João Pires; Laura Huber; Rachel A Hickman; Simon Dellicour; Kamonwan Lunha; Thongpan Leangapichart; Jatesada Jiwakanon; Ulf Magnusson; Marianne Sunde; Josef D Järhult; Thomas P Van Boeckel
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.465

3.  Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from the Poultry Farm Environment.

Authors:  Yuvaneswary Veloo; Syahidiah S A Thahir; Sakshaleni Rajendiran; Lim K Hock; Norazah Ahmad; Vickneshwaran Muthu; Rafiza Shaharudin
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. is influenced by production system, antimicrobial use, and biosecurity measures on Spanish pig farms.

Authors:  Oscar Mencía-Ares; Héctor Argüello; Héctor Puente; Manuel Gómez-García; Edgar G Manzanilla; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Ana Carvajal; Pedro Rubio
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 5.  Residual antimicrobial agents in food originating from animals.

Authors:  Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan; Mohamed E El Zowalaty; Åke Lundkvist; Josef D Järhult; Md Raihan Khan Nayem; Abu Zubayer Tanzin; Md Rahim Badsha; Shahneaz Ali Khan; Hossam M Ashour
Journal:  Trends Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 12.563

6.  In Vitro and In Vivo Gastrointestinal Survival of Non-Encapsulated and Microencapsulated Salmonella Bacteriophages: Implications for Bacteriophage Therapy in Poultry.

Authors:  Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque; Danish J Malik; Pablo Catalá-Gregori; Clara Marin; Sandra Sevilla-Navarro
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06

7.  Associations between Bovine Coronavirus and Bovine Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections and Productivity, Health Status and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Swedish Dairy Herds.

Authors:  Anna Duse; Anna Ohlson; Lena Stengärde; Madeleine Tråvén; Stefan Alenius; Björn Bengtsson
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 8.  Nanomaterials and Essential Oils as Candidates for Developing Novel Treatment Options for Bovine Mastitis.

Authors:  Andra Sabina Neculai-Valeanu; Adina Mirela Ariton; Bianca Maria Mădescu; Cristina Mihaela Rîmbu; Şteofil Creangă
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Role played by the environment in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the food chain.

Authors:  Konstantinos Koutsoumanis; Ana Allende; Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez; Declan Bolton; Sara Bover-Cid; Marianne Chemaly; Robert Davies; Alessandra De Cesare; Lieve Herman; Friederike Hilbert; Roland Lindqvist; Maarten Nauta; Giuseppe Ru; Marion Simmons; Panagiotis Skandamis; Elisabetta Suffredini; Héctor Argüello; Thomas Berendonk; Lina Maria Cavaco; William Gaze; Heike Schmitt; Ed Topp; Beatriz Guerra; Ernesto Liébana; Pietro Stella; Luisa Peixe
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-06-17

10.  2018 Survey of factors associated with antimicrobial drug use and stewardship practices in adult cows on conventional California dairies: immediate post-Senate Bill 27 impact.

Authors:  Pius S Ekong; Essam M Abdelfattah; Emmanuel Okello; Deniece R Williams; Terry W Lehenbauer; Betsy M Karle; Joan D Rowe; Sharif S Aly
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.