| Literature DB >> 33746363 |
Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan1, Mohamed E El Zowalaty2,3, Åke Lundkvist3, Josef D Järhult4, Md Raihan Khan Nayem1, Abu Zubayer Tanzin1, Md Rahim Badsha5, Shahneaz Ali Khan1, Hossam M Ashour6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The agricultural food products industry in Bangladesh depends on utilizing antimicrobials indiscriminately as growth promoters and for controlling infectious diseases. Thus, there is always a risk of antimicrobial agent accumulation in food sources that originate from agricultural production.Entities:
Keywords: Animals; Antimicrobial agents; COVID-19 pandemic; Food chain; Growth promotors; Livestock; Residual
Year: 2021 PMID: 33746363 PMCID: PMC7953985 DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0924-2244 Impact factor: 12.563
Fig. 1Flow chart of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) showing the search strategy and selection process for research articles published between 2013 and 2019. Based on the search criteria, a total of 704 English language published articles were identified and were further refined into 10 articles as described in the PRISMA flowchart.
Detection, sources, and prevalence of antimicrobial residues between 2013 and 2019 in Bangladesh.
| Area | Duration | Publication year | Sample source | Sample category | Sample | Method | Antibiotics | Total samples | Outcome | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chattogram | 2009 | 2016 | Poultry farm | Layer chickens | Thigh | MIT TLC | 4 | 100 | Ciprofloxacin Enrofloxacin Tetracycline Amoxicillin | |
| Chattogram | 2011–2012 | 2015 | Poultry farm | Layer chickens Livestock | Eggs | MIT TLC UHPLC | 3 | 210 | Ciprofloxacin Tetracycline | |
| Chattogram | 2012 | 2014 | Live bird market | Layer chickens Broiler chickens | Thigh | TLC UHPLC | 4 | 50 | Ciprofloxacin Enrofloxacin Tetracycline Amoxicillin | |
| Chattogram | 2013 | 2013 | Live bird market | Broiler chickens | Meat | LC-MS | 1 | 80 | Chloramphenicol | |
| Chattogram | 2015 | 2019 | Live bird market | Broiler chickens Indigenous chicken | Thigh | TLC, UHPLC | 4 | 335 | Ciprofloxacin Enrofloxacin Amoxicillin Oxytetracycline | |
| Sylhet | 2016 | 2018 | Fish market | Fish | Tilapia | UHPLC | 1 | 24 | Oxytetracycline | |
| Sylhet | 2016 | 2018 | Fish market | Fish | Pungas | UHPLC | 1 | 24 | Oxytetracycline | |
| Gazipur | 2017 | 2018 | Live bird market and farm | Broiler chickens | Thigh | TLC | 5 | 160 | Ciprofloxacin Enrofloxacin Oxytetracycline Amoxicillin Doxycycline | |
| Mymensingh | 2017 | 2019 | Poultry farm | Broiler chickens | Meat | TLC | 1 | 108 | Colistin | |
| Mymensingh | 2017 | 2018 | Live bird market | Broiler chickens | Breast | TLC | 3 | 30 | Ciprofloxacin |
Microbial Inhibition Test (MIT); Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC); Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC); Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS).
Fig. 2A map of Bangladesh showing the study areas and the spatial distribution of residual antimicrobial agents (4 districts in different colors; Chattogram, Sylhet, Gazipur and Mymensingh). The map was plotted using ArcMap, version 10.2, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, USA. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Qualitative detection of antimicrobial residues in foods of animal origin using the Microbial inhibition test (MIT).
| Sample category | Sample | Ciprofloxacin | Tetracycline | Amoxicillin | References | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layer chickens | Liver | 50, 34, 68, 53.30–80.48 | 50, 25, 50, 35.73–64.47 | 50, 37, 74, 59.66–85.37 | ( | |||
| Kidney | 50, 30, 60, 45.18–73.59 | 50, 33, 66, 51.23–78.79 | 50, 36, 72, 57.51–83.77 | |||||
| Breast | 50, 30, 60, 45.18–73.59 | 50, 20, 40, 26.41–54.82 | 50, 35, 70, 55.39–82.14 | |||||
| Thigh | 50, 25, 50, 35.73–64.47 | 50, 22, 44, 29.99–58.75 | 50, 27, 54, 39.32–68.19 | |||||
| Eggs | 200, 54, 27, 20.98–33.72 | 200, 32, 16, 11.21–21.83 | 200, 22, 11, 7.02–16.18 | 50, 32, 64, 49.19–77.08 | 50, 27, 54, 39.32–68.19 | 50, 30, 60, 45.18–73.59 | ||
| Livestock | Milk | 200, 25, 12.5, 8.26–17.90 | 200, 35, 17.5, 12.50–23.49 | 200, 52, 26, 20.07–32.66 |
Qualitative detection of antimicrobials residues in foods of animal origin using the thin-layer chromatography (TLC).
| Sample category | Sample | Ciprofloxacin | Enrofloxacin | Tetracycline | Amoxicillin | Doxycycline | Oxytetracycline | Colistin | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layer chickens | Thigh | 65, 20, 30.77, 19.91–43.44 | 65, 15, 23.08, 13.53–35.19 | 65, 12, 18.46, 09.92–30.03 | 65, 17, 26.15, 16.03–38.54 | ( | |||
| Breast | 65, 19, 29.23, 18.60–41.82 | 65, 12, 18.46, 09.91–30.03 | 65, 16, 24.62, 14.77–36.87 | 65, 14, 21.54, 12.31–33.49 | |||||
| Liver | 65, 30, 46.15, 33.70–58.96 | 65, 27, 41.54, 29.44–54.44 | 65, 32, 49.23, 36.60–61.93 | 65, 31, 47.69, 11.10–31.77 | |||||
| Kidney | 65, 25, 38.46, 26.65–51.36 | 65, 24, 36.92, 25.28–49.80 | 65, 15, 23.07, 13.53–35.19 | 65, 25, 38.46, 26.53–51.36 | |||||
| Eggs | 150, 60, 40.00, 32.09–48.31 | 50, 13, 26.00, 14.63–40.34 | 150, 43, 28.67, 21.59–36.61 | 150, 29, 19.33, 13.35–26.57 | |||||
| Broiler chickens | Thigh | 195, 81, 41.54, 34.54–48.79 | 195, 47, 24.10, 18.28–30.73 | 35, 8, 22.86, 10.42–40.13 | 195, 52, 26.67, 20.60–33.45 | 160, 45, 28.13, 21.31–35.77 | 160, 47, 29.38, 22.45–37.08 | ( | |
| Breast | 195, 74, 37.95, 31.11–45.15 | 195, 40, 20.51, 15.08–26.87 | 35, 9, 25.71, 12.49–43.26 | 195, 47, 24.10, 18.28–30.73 | 150, 41, 25.63, 20.38–35.20 | 160, 36, 22.50, 16.28–29.76 | |||
| Liver | 225, 107, 47.56, 40.88–54.30 | 225, 84, 37.33, 30.99–44.01 | 65, 23, 35.38, 23.92–48.23 | 195, 81, 41.54, 34.54–48.79 | 160, 69, 43.13, 35.33–51.18 | 160, 74, 46.25, 38.35–54.29 | |||
| Kidney | 35, 17, 48.57, 31.38–66.01 | 35, 11, 31.43, 16.85–49.29 | 35, 9, 25.71, 12.49–43.26 | 35, 25, 71.43, 53.69–85.36 | |||||
| Meat | 148, 129, 87.16, 80.68–92.09 | 108, 60, 55.55, 45.68–65.12 | |||||||
| Indigenous chicken | Meat | 34, 30, 88.24, 72.55–96.70 | ( | ||||||
| Egg | 100, 9, 09.00, 04.20–16.40 | 100, 7, 07.00, 02.86–13.89 | 100, 5, 05.00, 01.64–11.28 | ||||||
| Livestock | Milk | 200, 22, 11.00, 07.02–16.18 | 200, 33, 16.50, 11.64–22.38 | 200, 48, 24.00, 18.26–30.53 | |||||
| Fish | Climbing perch | 24, 16, 66.67, 44.67–84.37 | 24, 2, 08.33, 01.02–27.00 | ||||||
| Rui fish | 33, 21, 63.63, 45.12–79.60 | 33, 10, 30.30, 15.59–48.71 | |||||||
| Tilapia | 33, 18, 54.54, 36.35–71.89 | 33, 1, 03.03, 00.07–15.76 | |||||||
| Bombay duck | 33, 4, 12.12, 03.40–28.20 | 33, 0, | |||||||
| Shrimp | 30, 15, 50.00, 31.30–68.70 | 30, 10, 33.33, 17.29–52.82 |
Quantitative detection of antimicrobial residues in foods of animal origin using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) and Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS).
| Sample category | Sample (n) | Amoxicillin (mg/kg) | Oxytetracycline (mg/kg) | Chloramphenicol (mg/kg) | Test methods |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broiler chickens | Breast (10) | 0.479 | UHPLC | ||
| Liver (10) | 0.0847 | ||||
| Liver (10) | 0.000403 | LC-MS | |||
| Meat (145) | 522.90 | UHPLC | |||
| Meat (10) | 0.000275 | LC-MS | |||
| Indigenous chickens | Meat (33) | 444.30 | UHPLC | ||
| Meat (10) | 0.000405 | LC-MS | |||
| Liver (10) | 0.000438 | ||||
| Eggs (10) | 29.64 | UHPLC | |||
| Livestock | Milk (10) | 33.00 | |||
| Fish | Climbing perch (5) | 584.40 | |||
| Climbing perch (10) | 0.000188 | LC-MS | |||
| Rui fish (8) | 555.60 | UHPLC | |||
| Rui fish (10) | 0.000515 | LC-MS | |||
| Trout (10) | 0.000328 | ||||
| Bombay duck (2) | 14.80 | UHPLC | |||
| Shrimp (7) | 419.50 | ||||
| Tilapia (6) | 683.20 | ||||
| Tilapia (24) | 0.0388 | ||||
| Tilapia (10) | 0.0003535 | LC-MS | |||
| Pungas (10) | 0.000133 | ||||
| Pungas (24) | 0.0351 | UHPLC |
Antibiotic concentrations are based on the following references (Bakar et al., 2013; Barman et al., 2018; Chowdhury et al., 2015; Ferdous et al., 2019; Hossain et al., 2018; Sattar et al., 2014).
Fig. 3Flowchart showing the presence of antimicrobial residues arising from the use of antimicrobial agents in Bangladesh.