| Literature DB >> 33336112 |
Yu Zhuang1,2,3, Chenglong Zhang1,2,3, Mengjia Cheng1,2,3, Jinyang Huang1,2,3, Qingcheng Liu1,2,3, Guangyin Yuan4, Kaili Lin1,2,3, Hongbo Yu1,2,3.
Abstract
Vascular diseases are the most prevalent cause of ischemic necrosis of tissue and organ, which even result in dysfunction and death. Vascular regeneration or artificial vascular graft, as the conventional treatment modality, has received keen attentions. However, small-diameter (diameter < 4 mm) vascular grafts have a high risk of thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia (IH), which makes long-term lumen patency challengeable. Endothelial cells (ECs) form the inner endothelium layer, and are crucial for anti-coagulation and thrombogenesis. Thus, promoting in situ endothelialization in vascular graft remodeling takes top priority, which requires recruitment of endothelia progenitor cells (EPCs), migration, adhesion, proliferation and activation of EPCs and ECs. Chemotaxis aimed at ligands on EPC surface can be utilized for EPC homing, while nanofibrous structure, biocompatible surface and cell-capturing molecules on graft surface can be applied for cell adhesion. Moreover, cell orientation can be regulated by topography of scaffold, and cell bioactivity can be modulated by growth factors and therapeutic genes. Additionally, surface modification can also reduce thrombogenesis, and some drug release can inhibit IH. Considering the influence of macrophages on ECs and smooth muscle cells (SMCs), scaffolds loaded with drugs that can promote M2 polarization are alternative strategies. In conclusion, the advanced strategies for enhanced long-term lumen patency of vascular grafts are summarized in this review. Strategies for recruitment of EPCs, adhesion, proliferation and activation of EPCs and ECs, anti-thrombogenesis, anti-IH, and immunomodulation are discussed. Ideal vascular grafts with appropriate surface modification, loading and fabrication strategies are required in further studies.Entities:
Keywords: Immunomodulation; In situ endothelialization; Intimal hyperplasia; Thrombogenesis; Vascular graft
Year: 2020 PMID: 33336112 PMCID: PMC7721596 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1The challenges after vascular graft implantation. Days and weeks after implantation, insufficient endothelialization and thrombogenesis may happen. Months after implantation, uncontrollable proliferation of SMCs may lead to IH. Inflammatory cells play a role in regulating EC and SMC behavior.
Fig. 2Schematic illustration for in situ endothelialization and lumen patency strategies.
Fig. 3Recruitment and adhesion of EPCs and ECs. Chemokines can be utilized for EPC chemotaxis. Nanofibrous structure, biocompatible surface with bioactive binding sites and specific molecules modification can be applied for EPC and EC adhesion.
Chemokines for stem cell chemotaxis to enhance in situ endothelialization.
| Targeting Receptors | Chemokines | Loading approach | Targeting cells | Activated Signaling Pathway | Effects | Ref | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXC Family | CXCR4 | SDF-1α | / | CD117+ stem cell | SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis | CD117+ cell homing to injured sites | [ | |
| CXCR4 | SDF-1α | Coating on synthetic polyester grafts | CD117+/CD34+ stem cell | SDF-1α/CXCR4 axis | CXCR4+ cell homing for | [ | ||
| CXCR7 | SDF-1α | Immobilized onto heparin | CD34+ EPC, | SDF-1α/CXCR7 axis | Both EPC and SMPC recruitment for | [ | ||
| CXCR7 | Dkk3 | Co-electrospinning technology | Sca-1+ cells | Dkk3/CXCR7/ERK1/2; PI3K/AKT axis | EPC recruitment and differentiation | [ | ||
| Integrin family | α4-integrin-VCAM1 | Fibronectin (Fn) | Coating on synthetic polyester grafts | CD117+/CD34+ stem cell | Fn/VCAM1 axis | VCAM+ cell homing | [ | |
| Integrin | 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP | / | EPC | GTPase Rap1 | EPC recruitment | [ | ||
| Others | RAGE | HMGB1 | / | EPC | integrin-dependent adhesion of EPCs | EPC homing to injured sites | [ | |
| Rac1 | MCP1 | / | SMC | p115 RhoGEF/Rac1 GTPase pathway | SMC migration and proliferation for vascular remodeling | [ | ||
| VEGFR1, VEGFR2 | VEGF | Surface‐fixed on styrenated gelatin gel | EPC | VEGF/VEGFR | Graft for | |||
Fig. 4The influence of surface topography on cell morphology and biological behavior. (A–B): Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for inner lamellar structure of vascular graft; A: Inner lamellar structure fabricated by freeze-cast, with the lamellar 10 μm high, 200 nm thick, and the interval between lamellas was 20 μm; B: Inner non-lamellar structure fabricated by direct freeze-drying. (C): Cell behavior on graft surface; (a): Platelets adhesion. SEM figures showed that less platelets adhered on lamellar structure, and they were not activated; b: ECs elongation. ECs displayed elongated adherence along aligned surface of vascular graft and enhanced proliferation. (D): Optical figures and HE staining 3 months after implantation. Reproduced from Ref. [160], ACS NANO, ACS Publication @ 2019.
Fig. 5Bioactive molecules and therapeutic genes for enhanced in situ endothelialization. Strategies including micro/nano particle loading, nanofibers embedment or graft surface coating can be utilized to deliver therapeutic factors for promoted cell proliferation and activation. Furthermore, targeting molecules are used for more efficient gene delivery to targeted cells.
Nanoscale and microscale carriers for growth factor delivery.
| Carriers | Cargos | Sizes | Dosages | Results | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanoparticle | Chitosan/heparin NP | VEGF | 67–132 nm | 43, 113, or 237 ng/mL | Enhancing regeneration of decellularized tissue-engineered scaffolds | [ |
| Microparticle | Alginate microbeads | FGF-1 | 140 μm | 600 ng | Rapid and persistent vascular response | [ |
| Gelatin microspheres | FGF-2 | 40 μm | 30 mg | Improving mechanical properties and releasing FGF-2 | [ | |
| Gelatin microparticles | VEGF | 75–125 μm | 0–100 ng/mL | Prolonging VEGF activity and increasing endothelialization | [ | |
| Nanofibers | Electrospun PELCL/gelatin and PLGA/gelatin nanofibers | VEGF, PDGF | VEGF 0.59 ng/mg; | PELCLC 568 nm; PLGA 940 nm | VEGF for EC proliferation, and PDGF for SMC proliferation | [ |
| Self-assembly nanofibrous gel | VEGF, FGF-2 | 25 ng | / | Promoting the tube formation of ECs | [ | |
Note: Poly (ethylene glycol)-b-poly (l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone): PELCL; poly (l-lactide-co-glycolide): PLGA.
Fig. 6NO plays a crucial role in modulating endothelialization, thrombogenesis and IH. (A): The biological performance of NO. NO can be liberated by catalyzing NO donors, and play a role in vascularization, including inhibiting activation of thrombin, platelets, immune cells and proliferation of SMCs, as well as promoting proliferation and activation of ECs, relaxation and phenotype regulation of SMCs. (B–C): Fluorescence staining of ECs and SMCs 24h and 72h after in vitro culture. NO can promote EC proliferation (B) and inhibit SMC growth (C). (A) reproduced from Ref. [242], Research, CAST@ 2020. (B–C) reproduced from Ref. [249], Biomaterials, Elsevier @ 2019.
Fig. 7Macrophage performance in vascularization. Drugs or sEVs are utilized to promote the transition of M1 into M2 and regulate inflammation reactions for endothelialization enhancement, anti-IH and anti-calcification.
Fig. 8Multiple strategies for enhanced in situ endothelialization and long-term lumen patency.