Literature DB >> 16145003

Synergistic neovascularization by mixed transplantation of early endothelial progenitor cells and late outgrowth endothelial cells: the role of angiogenic cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases.

Chang-Hwan Yoon1, Jin Hur, Kyung-Woo Park, Ji-Hyun Kim, Choon-Soo Lee, Il-Young Oh, Tae-Youn Kim, Hyun-Jai Cho, Hyun-Jae Kang, In-Ho Chae, Han-Kwang Yang, Byung-Hee Oh, Young-Bae Park, Hyo-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two types of cells are cultured from the human peripheral blood, early endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs), as previously reported. Here, we further characterize these cells, especially with respect to their different origins and functions both in vitro and in vivo. We also investigated whether the combination of these different cell types shows synergism during neovascularization. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Early EPCs were heterogeneously made up of both CD14+ monocyte-derived cells, which secrete cytokines, and CD14(-)-derived cells, which contain high levels of (CD34+)KDR+ cells. OECs were cultured almost exclusively from CD14- cells, not CD14+ cells, and were distinct from mature endothelial cells in terms of proliferation potential, KDR+ expression level, and telomerase activity. A portion of cells from CD14- cells and early EPCs produced rapidly proliferating, capillary-forming cells in both the Matrigel plug and the ischemic hind limb similar to OECs. Early EPCs and OECs expressed receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-8, cytokines secreted by early EPCs. There was a differential increase in matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs): MMP-9 in early EPCs and MMP-2 in OECs. In vitro, the angiogenic capability of the 2 cell types was augmented by mutual interaction through cytokines and MMPs. Injection of a mixture of the 2 cells resulted in superior neovascularization in vivo to any single-cell-type transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Distinct origins of the different types of EPCs exist that have different functions in neovascularization. Mixed transplantation of these cells results in synergistic neovascularization through cytokines and MMPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16145003     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.503433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  186 in total

1.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) depresses angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro: implications for sourcing cells for vascular regeneration therapy.

Authors:  O Tura; J Crawford; G R Barclay; K Samuel; P W F Hadoke; H Roddie; J Davies; M L Turner
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Identification of a restriction point at the M/G1 transition in CHO cells.

Authors:  E Hullemann; J J M Bijvelt; A J Verkleij; C T Verrips; J Boonstra
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Translational research: current status, challenges and future strategies.

Authors:  Dale Yu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Endothelial colony-forming cells show a mature transcriptional response to shear stress.

Authors:  Anastasia D Egorova; Marco C DeRuiter; Hetty C de Boer; Simone van de Pas; Adriana C Gittenberger-de Groot; Anton J van Zonneveld; Robert E Poelmann; Beerend P Hierck
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 5.  Revisiting cardiovascular regeneration with bone marrow-derived angiogenic and vasculogenic cells.

Authors:  Sangho Lee; Young-Sup Yoon
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Regeneration of the vascular compartment.

Authors:  M U Becher; G Nickenig; N Werner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 7.  In vitro models for the evaluation of angiogenic potential in bone engineering.

Authors:  Elisabetta Cenni; Francesca Perut; Nicola Baldini
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  Resident vascular progenitor cells--diverse origins, phenotype, and function.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Adriana Harbuzariu; Sinny Delacroix; Eric W Holroyd; Robert D Simari
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells decrease renal injury in experimental swine renal artery stenosis through different mechanisms.

Authors:  Xiang-Yang Zhu; Victor Urbieta-Caceres; James D Krier; Stephen C Textor; Amir Lerman; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 10.  Assessing identity, phenotype, and fate of endothelial progenitor cells.

Authors:  Karen K Hirschi; David A Ingram; Mervin C Yoder
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 8.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.