| Literature DB >> 33330148 |
Eun-Yeol Kim1, Byung-Yoon Park1, In-Bo Kim1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Korean Shoulder Scoring System (KSS) is a reliable and valid procedure for discriminative assessment of the clinical status of patients with rotator cuff tears. This study evaluates the correlation between the preoperative KSS and factors in patients with rotator cuff tears.Entities:
Keywords: Korean Shoulder Scoring System; Preoperative factors; Rotator cuff tear
Year: 2018 PMID: 33330148 PMCID: PMC7726370 DOI: 10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.30
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Shoulder Elb ISSN: 1226-9344
Demographic Data for Clinical Variables (n=490)
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 59.2 ± 7.8 (37.0–83.0) |
| Sex (male:female) | 247 : 243 |
| Symptom duration (mo) | 16.2 ± 34.8 (1–480) |
| Preoperative Korean Shoulder Scoring System | 65.1 ± 14.5 (6–93) |
| Function | 20.1 ± 4.4 (0–30) |
| Pain | 12.4 ± 3.6 (0–20) |
| Satisfaction | 4.2 ± 2.1 (0–20) |
| Range of motion | 14.4 ± 4.0 (0–20) |
| Strength | 6.9 ± 2.1 (0–10) |
| Endurance | 6.5 ± 4.5 (0–18) |
| Tear size (mm) | |
| Mediolateral | 23.8 ± 11.9 (2.0–70.0) |
| Anteroposterior | 18.3 ± 11.3 (2.7–70.0) |
| Acromiohumeral distance (mm) | 9.0 ± 1.6 (3.7–13.9) |
| Tendon involvement | |
| Supraspinatus | 430 |
| Supraspinatus+subscapularis | 28 |
| Suparspintus+infraspinatuss | 32 |
| All 3 tendons | 0 |
| Tangent sign | 12 |
| Fatty infiltration, subscapularis/supraspinatus/infraspintus/teres minor (n) | |
| 0 | 149/82/50/211 |
| 1 | 308/348/300/252 |
| 2 | 30/55/125/24 |
| 3 | 3/4/8/0 |
| 4 | 0/1/7/3 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range) or number only.
Correlation between Various Factors and the Preoperative Korean Shoulder Scoring System
| Variable | Function | Pain | Satisfaction | ROM | Strength | Endurance | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||||||
| Correlation (r) | -0.183 | -0.066 | -0.029 | -0.295 | -0.219 | -0.214 | -0.272 |
| | <0.001[ | 0.145 | 0.517 | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ |
| Symptom duration | |||||||
| Correlation (r) | 0.039 | -0.092 | -0.061 | 0.044 | 0.077 | 0.076 | 0.025 |
| | 0.390 | 0.041[ | 0.180 | 0.334 | 0.088 | 0.091 | 0.575 |
| ML tear size | |||||||
| Correlation (r) | -0.129 | -0.040 | -0.052 | -0.233 | -0.256 | -0.198 | -0.228 |
| | 0.004[ | 0.375 | 0.248 | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ |
| AP tear size | |||||||
| Correlation (r) | -0.117 | 0.028 | -0.028 | -0.234 | -0.202 | -0.166 | -0.193 |
| | 0.010[ | 0.538 | 0.530 | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ |
| AHD | |||||||
| Correlation (r) | 0.129 | 0.002 | 0.019 | 0.134 | 0.207 | 0.218 | 0.171 |
| | 0.004[ | 0.970 | 0.680 | 0.003[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ |
| Sex[ | |||||||
| Male | 20.7 ± 4.0 | 12.7 ± 3.4 | 4.3 ± 1.9 | 14.7 ± 3.8 | 7.3 ± 2.0 | 7.9 ± 3.9 | 68.2 ± 13.1 |
| Female | 19.4 ± 4.8 | 12.1 ± 3.8 | 4.2 ± 2.2 | 14.1 ± 4.2 | 6.4 ± 2.1 | 5.2 ± 4.6 | 61.9 ± 15.2 |
| | 0.001[ | 0.081 | 0.353 | 0.117 | <0.001[ | <0.001[ | <0.001[ |
| Tangent sign[ | |||||||
| No | 20.1 ± 4.5 | 12.4 ± 3.6 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 14.5 ± 4.0 | 6.9 ± 2.0 | 6.6 ± 4.5 | 65.2 ± 14.4 |
| Yes | 20.4 ± 4.3 | 12.5 ± 3.4 | 4.7 ± 1.8 | 13.3 ± 4.9 | 5.5 ± 3.6 | 5.3 ± 4.8 | 62.5 ± 20.1 |
| | 0.806 | 0.945 | 0.480 | 0.344 | 0.213 | 0.342 | 0.533 |
ROM: range of motion, ML: mediolateral, AP: anteroposterior, AHD: acromiohumeral distance.
Statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
Statistical significances (p<0.05) were tested by chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.
Mean ± standard deviation.
Correlation between Tendon Involvement and the Preoperative Korean Shoulder Scoring System
| Variable | Function | Pain | Satisfaction | ROM | Strength | Endurance | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type I | 20.3 ± 4.3 | 12.5 ± 3.5 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 14.8 ± 3.7 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 6.8 ± 4.4 | 66.1 ± 13.6 |
| T[ | a | a | a | a | a | a | a |
| Type II | 19.7 ± 6.4 | 10.9 ± 4.5 | 4.0 ± 2.2 | 12.2 ± 5.3 | 6.4 ± 2.3 | 5.5 ± 4.8 | 58.7 ± 20.6 |
| T[ | a, b | a, b | a | a, b | a | a, b | a, b |
| Type III | 18.3 ± 4.6 | 12.2 ± 3.8 | 3.9 ± 2.0 | 11.9 ± 5.4 | 6.2 ± 1.9 | 4.5 ± 4.5 | 57.1 ± 17.0 |
| T[ | b | b | a | b | a | b | b |
| 0.046[ | 0.061 | 0.457 | <0.001[ | 0.050 | 0.010[ | <0.001[ |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
ROM: range of motion, Type I: supraspinatus, Type II: supraspinatus and subscapularis, Type III: supraspinatus and infraspinatus.
Statistical significances (p<0.05) were tested by One way analysis of variances among groups.
The same letters indicate non-significant difference between groups based on Scheffe or Dunnett’s T multiple comparison test according to the homogeneity of variance.
Correlation between Fatty Infiltration and the Preoperative Korean Shoulder Scoring System
| Variable | Function | Pain | Satisfaction | ROM | Strength | Endurance | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subscapularis | |||||||
| Group I | 20.1 ± 4.4 | 12.5 ± 3.6 | 4.2 ± 2.1 | 14.4 ± 4.0 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 6.6 ± 4.5 | 65.2 ± 14.3 |
| Group II | 20.1 ± 5.4 | 11.2 ± 3.3 | 4.4 ± 2.0 | 14.5 ± 4.6 | 6.9 ± 1.8 | 6.1 ± 4.5 | 63.8 ± 17.1 |
| | 0.954 | 0.046[ | 0.611 | 0.965 | 0.877 | 0.573 | 0.595 |
| Supraspinatus | |||||||
| Group I | 20.3 ± 4.5 | 12.5 ± 3.6 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 14.6 ± 4.0 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 6.8 ± 4.4 | 65.8 ± 14.4 |
| Group II | 18.8 ± 4.1 | 12.0 ± 3.6 | 3.9 ± 1.9 | 13.3 ± 4.4 | 6.3 ± 2.1 | 5.0 ± 4.8 | 59.8 ± 14.7 |
| | 0.013[ | 0.330 | 0.119 | 0.016[ | 0.022[ | 0.007[ | 0.003[ |
| Infraspinatus | |||||||
| Group I | 20.1 ± 4.4 | 12.5 ± 3.5 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 14.7 ± 3.8 | 7.0 ± 2.0 | 6.8 ± 4.4 | 66.0 ± 14.1 |
| Group II | 20.0 ± 4.6 | 12.3 ± 3.9 | 4.1 ± 1.9 | 13.6 ± 4.5 | 6.6 ± 2.2 | 6.0 ± 4.6 | 62.9 ± 15.5 |
| | 0.744 | 0.492 | 0.227 | 0.011[ | 0.055 | 0.096 | 0.038[ |
| Teres minor | |||||||
| Group I | 20.2 ± 4.4 | 12.4 ± 3.6 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 14.6 ± 4.0 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 6.6 ± 4.4 | 65.4 ± 14.3 |
| Group II | 18.3 ± 4.8 | 12.2 ± 3.8 | 4.1 ± 1.8 | 12.3 ± 4.2 | 6.3 ± 2.3 | 5.6 ± 4.9 | 60.1 ± 17.1 |
| | 0.030[ | 0.762 | 0.733 | 0.004[ | 0.150 | 0.291 | 0.067 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
ROM: range of motion, Group I: Goutallier stages 0 and 1, Group II: Goutallier stages 2, 3, and 4.
Statistical significances (p<0.05) were tested by independent t-test between groups.