Literature DB >> 21719319

Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at 5 years: part II--prognostic factors for clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Lawrence V Gulotta1, Shane J Nho, Christopher C Dodson, Ronald S Adler, David W Altchek, John D MacGillivray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A rotator cuff registry was established to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of all-arthroscopic repairs. The purpose of this study is to report prognostic factors for successful clinical and radiographic outcomes at 5 years.
METHODS: One-hundred ninety-three patients underwent all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. Pre- and intraoperative data were compared to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, range of motion, muscle strength, and ultrasound results at 5 years using univariate, and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: At 5 years, 106 patients completed follow-up. There were no pre- or intraoperative variables that were predictive of an ASES score >90. Factors predictive of a radiographic defect were larger size of the lesion (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04-2.85, P = .03), multiple tendon involvement (OR 5.56, 95% CI 1.23-25.22, P = .02), older age (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.28, P = .01), concomitant biceps (OR 16.16, 95% CI 3.01-86.65, P = .001), and acromioclavicular joint procedures (OR 6.70, 95% CI 1.46-30.73, P = .01). Radiographic healing did not correspond to clinical outcomes. Resolution of a radiographic defect was seen in 14 patients. Younger age (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95, P = .004) and single-tendon tears (OR 7.59, 95% CI 1.71-84.45, P = .04) were predictive. DISCUSSION: Larger tears in older patients who undergo concomitant procedures are predictive of radiographic defects at 5 years; however, radiographic healing did not correspond to clinical results. Younger patients with single tendon tears are more likely to undergo spontaneous resolution of a radiographic defect. This information can be useful in counseling patients regarding the mid-term results of this procedure.
Copyright © 2011 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21719319     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  32 in total

1.  Rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: current concepts review and evidence-based guidelines.

Authors:  Olivier A van der Meijden; Paul Westgard; Zachary Chandler; Trevor R Gaskill; Dirk Kokmeyer; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

2.  The effect of tear size on the treatment outcome of operatively treated rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Juha Kukkonen; Tommi Kauko; Petri Virolainen; Ville Äärimaa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Early anchor displacement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Gábor Skaliczki; Paolo Paladini; Giovanni Merolla; Fabrizio Campi; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Factors affecting healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Amir M Abtahi; Erin K Granger; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 6.  Long-term outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff treatment.

Authors:  Pietro Spennacchio; Giuseppe Banfi; Davide Cucchi; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Paolo Cabitza; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  The Repaired Rotator Cuff: MRI and Ultrasound Evaluation.

Authors:  Susan C Lee; Danielle Williams; Yoshimi Endo
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

Review 8.  Expectations Following Rotator Cuff Surgery.

Authors:  Alejandro Novoa-Boldo; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

9.  Aging-associated exacerbation in fatty degeneration and infiltration after rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Jonathan P Gumucio; Michael A Korn; Anjali L Saripalli; Michael D Flood; Anthony C Phan; Stuart M Roche; Evan B Lynch; Dennis R Claflin; Asheesh Bedi; Christopher L Mendias
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Rotator cuff integrity correlates with clinical and functional results at a minimum 16 years after open repair.

Authors:  Martti Vastamäki; Martina Lohman; Niclas Borgmästars
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.