Literature DB >> 18799326

Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prognostic factors affecting clinical and ultrasound outcome.

Shane J Nho1, Barrett S Brown, Stephen Lyman, Ronald S Adler, David W Altchek, John D MacGillivray.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify potential predictors of function and tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair that will enable the orthopaedic surgeon to determine which patients can expect a successful outcome. Between 2003 and 2005, the Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Registry was established to collect demographic, intraoperative, functional outcome, and ultrasound data prospectively on all patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. At total of 193 patients met the study criteria, and 127 (65.8%) completed the 2-year follow-up. The most significant independent factors affecting ultrasound outcome were age (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14; P = .006) and tear size (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.55-3.38; P < .001). After adjustment for age and tear size, the intraoperative factors found to be significantly associated with a tendon defect were concomitant biceps procedures (OR, 11.39; 95% CI, 2.90-44.69; P < .001) and acromioclavicular joint procedures (OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.46-10.12; P = .006). In contrast to the ultrasound data, the functional outcome variables, such as satisfaction (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 2.00-7.68; P < .001) and strength (OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 1.61-62.77; P = .01), had a greater role in predicting an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score greater than 90. The progression from a single-tendon rotator cuff tear to a multiple-tendon tear with associated pathology increased the likelihood of tendon defect by at least 9 times, and therefore, earlier surgical intervention for isolated, single-tendon rotator cuff tears could optimize the likelihood of ultrasound healing and an excellent functional outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18799326     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  49 in total

1.  Conservative management of rotator cuff tears: literature review and proposal for a prognostic. Prediction Score.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Paolo Paladini; Marco Saporito; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2011-10-30

2.  EXERCISE REHABILITATION IN THE NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Peter Edwards; Jay Ebert; Brendan Joss; Gev Bhabra; Tim Ackland; Allan Wang
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-04

Review 3.  Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Salma Chaudhury; Stephen E Gwilym; Jane Moser; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 4.  Prognostic factors influencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Gianpiero Cazzato; Fabrizio Donati; Pietro Randelli; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Quantitative assessment of the supraspinatus tendon on MRI using T2/T2* mapping and shear-wave ultrasound elastography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Konstantin Krepkin; Mary Bruno; José G Raya; Ronald S Adler; Soterios Gyftopoulos
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  In vivo shoulder function after surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff: glenohumeral joint mechanics, shoulder strength, clinical outcomes, and their interaction.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Cathryn D Peltz; Kristin Ciarelli; Stephanie K Kline; George W Divine; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Stephanie Muh; Patricia A Kolowich; Terrence R Lock; Vasilios Moutzouros
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Expectations Following Rotator Cuff Surgery.

Authors:  Alejandro Novoa-Boldo; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

8.  Rotator cuff tear characteristics: how comparable are the pre-operative MRI findings with intra-operative measurements following debridement during arthroscopic repair?

Authors:  Ilker Eren; Hakan Ozben; Caner Gunerbuyuk; Özgür Koyuncu; Murat Serhat Aygün; Edip Hatipoglu; Üstün Aydingöz; Mehmet Demirhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Richard C Mather; Lane Koenig; Daniel Acevedo; Timothy M Dall; Paul Gallo; Anthony Romeo; John Tongue; Gerald Williams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score Analysis From the ROW Cohort.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Gregory D Ayers; Run Fan; John E Kuhn; Jon J P Warner; Keith M Baumgarten; Elizabeth Matzkin; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.