Literature DB >> 33314643

Portal dosimetry in radiotherapy repeatability evaluation.

Krzysztof Ślosarek1, Dominika Plaza1, Aleksandra Nas1, Marta Reudelsdorf1, Jacek Wendykier1, Barbara Bekman1, Aleksandra Grządziel1.   

Abstract

The accuracy of radiotherapy is the subject of continuous discussion, and dosimetry methods, particularly in dynamic techniques, are being developed. At the same time, many oncology centers develop quality procedures, including pretreatment and online dose verification and proper patient tracking methods. This work aims to present the possibility of using portal dosimetry in the assessment of radiotherapy repeatability. The analysis was conducted on 74 cases treated with dynamic techniques. Transit dosimetry was made for each collision-free radiation beam. It allowed the comparison of summary fluence maps, obtained for fractions with the corresponding summary maps from all other treatment fractions. For evaluation of the compatibility in the fluence map pairs (6798), the gamma coefficient was calculated. The results were considered in four groups, depending on the used radiotherapy technique: stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy, breath-hold, free-breathing, and conventionally fractionated other cases. The chi2 or Fisher's exact test was made depending on the size of the analyzed set and also Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare treatment repeatability of different techniques. The aim was to test whether the null hypothesis of error-free therapy was met. The patient is treated repeatedly if the P-value in all the fluence maps sets is higher than the level of 0.01. The best compatibility between treatment fractions was obtained for the stereotactic technique. The technique with breath-holding gave the lowest percentage of compliance of the analyzed fluence pairs. The results indicate that the repeatability of the treatment is associated with the radiotherapy technique. Treated volume location is also an essential factor found in the evaluation of treatment accuracy. The EPID device is a useful tool in assessing the repeatability of radiotherapy. The proposed method of fluence maps comparison also allows us to assess in which therapeutic session the patient was treated differently from the other fractions.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPID; fluence maps; gamma analysis; transit dosimetry

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33314643      PMCID: PMC7856497          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  16 in total

1.  A method to verify sections of arc during intrafraction portal dosimetry for prostate VMAT.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Ian M Hanson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Technical Note: A simple algorithm to convert EPID gray values into absorbed dose to water without prior knowledge.

Authors:  Christine Boutry; Aurélie Sors; Jimmy Fontaine; Nolwenn Delaby; Gregory Delpon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dosimetric pre-treatment verification of IMRT using an EPID; clinical experience.

Authors:  Mathilda van Zijtveld; Maarten L P Dirkx; Hans C J de Boer; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  In vivo dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ben Mijnheer; Sam Beddar; Joanna Izewska; Chester Reft
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Catching errors with in vivo EPID dosimetry.

Authors:  A Mans; M Wendling; L N McDermott; J J Sonke; R Tielenburg; R Vijlbrief; B Mijnheer; M van Herk; J C Stroom
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The effect of the choice of patient model on the performance of in vivo 3D EPID dosimetry to detect variations in patient position and anatomy.

Authors:  Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Roel Rozendaal; Simon van Kranen; Ben Mijnheer; Anton Mans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Guide to clinical use of electronic portal imaging.

Authors:  M G Herman; J J Kruse; C R Hagness
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Transit and non-transit 3D EPID dosimetry versus detector arrays for patient specific QA.

Authors:  Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Begoña Vivas-Maiques; Jochem Kaas; Thijs Perik; Frits Wittkamper; Ben Mijnheer; Anton Mans
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Investigation of a real-time EPID-based patient dose monitoring safety system using site-specific control limits.

Authors:  Todsaporn Fuangrod; Peter B Greer; Henry C Woodruff; John Simpson; Shashank Bhatia; Benjamin Zwan; Timothy A vanBeek; Boyd M C McCurdy; Richard H Middleton
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.