Literature DB >> 33313866

Financial implications of using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following heart transplantation.

Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy1,2,3, Vipin Mehta1, William Critchley4, Paul Callan1, Steve Shaw1, Rajamiyer Venkateswaran1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Primary graft dysfunction after heart transplant is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used to wean patients from cardiopulmonary bypass. This study retrospectively reviews a single-centre experience of post-transplant ECMO in regard to outcomes and associated costs.
METHODS: Between May 2006 and May 2019, a total of 267 adult heart transplants were performed. We compared donor and recipient variables, ECMO duration and the incidence of renal failure, bleeding, infection and cost analysis between ECMO and non-ECMO groups.
RESULTS: ECMO support was required postoperatively to manage primary graft dysfunction in 72 (27%) patients. The mean duration of ECMO support was 6 ± 3.2 days. Mean ischaemic times were similar between the groups. There was a significantly higher proportion of ventricular assist device explant to transplant in the ECMO group versus non-ECMO (38.2% vs 14.1%; P < 0.0001). ECMO patients had a longer duration of stay in the intensive care unit (P < 0.0001) and total hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Greater mortality was observed in the ECMO group (P < 0.0001). The median cost of providing ECMO was £18 000 [interquartile range (IQR): £12 750-£24 000] per patient with an additional median £35 225 (IQR: £21 487.25-£51 780.75) for ITU stay whilst on ECMO. The total median cost per patient inclusive of hospital stay, ECMO and dialysis costs was £65 737.50 (IQR: £52 566.50-£95 221.75) in the non-ECMO group compared to £145 415.71 (IQR: £102 523.21-£200 618.96) per patient in the ECMO group (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary graft dysfunction following heart transplantation who require ECMO are frequently bridged to a recovery; however, the medium and longer-term survival for these patients is poorer than for patients who do not require ECMO.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary bypass; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Post-heart transplant; Primary graft dysfunction; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33313866      PMCID: PMC8906771          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  21 in total

1.  Improved outcomes from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus ventricular assist device temporary support of primary graft dysfunction in heart transplant.

Authors:  Koji Takeda; Boyangzi Li; Arthur R Garan; Veli K Topkara; Jiho Han; Paolo C Colombo; Maryjane A Farr; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 2.  Primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Eugene C DePasquale; Abbas Ardehali
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Acute lung injury after mechanical circulatory support implantation in patients on extracorporeal life support: an unrecognized problem.

Authors:  David Boulate; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Matteo Pozzi; Michaela Niculescu; Alain Combes; Pascal Leprince; Matthias Kirsch
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation temporary support for early graft failure after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Cosimo D'Alessandro; Stéphane Aubert; Jean Louis Golmard; Beltran Levy Praschker; Charles Edouard Luyt; Alain Pavie; Iradj Gandjbakhch; Pascal Leprince
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Report from a consensus conference on primary graft dysfunction after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Jon Kobashigawa; Andreas Zuckermann; Peter Macdonald; Pascal Leprince; Fardad Esmailian; Minh Luu; Donna Mancini; Jignesh Patel; Rabia Razi; Hermann Reichenspurner; Stuart Russell; Javier Segovia; Nicolas Smedira; Josef Stehlik; Florian Wagner
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  The Use of ECMO for the Treatment of Refractory Cardiac Arrest or Postarrest Cardiogenic Shock Following In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Meshe Chonde; Penny Sappington; Robert Kormos; Andrew Althouse; Arthur Boujoukos
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.510

7.  Experience of ECMO in primary graft dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation.

Authors:  Elson Borges Lima; Claudio Ribeiro da Cunha; Vitor Salvatore Barzilai; Marcelo Botelho Ulhoa; Maria Regina de Barros; Camila Scatolin Moraes; Letycia Chagas Fortaleza; Nubia Wellerson Vieira; Fernando Antibas Atik
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for graft dysfunction after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jae Hong Lim; Ho Young Hwang; Sang Yoon Yeom; Hyun-Jai Cho; Hae-Young Lee; Ki-Bong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-04-10

Review 9.  Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock after adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Scott Dougherty; Omar Bouamra; Vasudev Pai; Philip Curry; Steven Tsui; Stephen Clark; Stephen Westaby; Nawwar Al-Attar; Vipin Zamvar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 10.  Thoratec CentriMag for temporary treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock or severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Oleg Borisenko; Gillian Wylie; John Payne; Staffan Bjessmo; Jon Smith; Nizar Yonan; Richard Firmin
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.