Literature DB >> 28087104

Improved outcomes from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus ventricular assist device temporary support of primary graft dysfunction in heart transplant.

Koji Takeda1, Boyangzi Li2, Arthur R Garan3, Veli K Topkara3, Jiho Han2, Paolo C Colombo3, Maryjane A Farr3, Yoshifumi Naka2, Hiroo Takayama2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is one of the most common causes of early death after orthotopic heart transplantation. Mechanical circulatory support devices are required for severe forms of PGD. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and temporary ventricular assist device (VAD) support have both been reported to be useful for severe PGD.
METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2015, 597 patients received a heart transplant at our center. Of those, severe PGD developed in 44 patients (7.4%), and they received a continuous-flow external VAD (n = 17) or VA-ECMO (n = 27) support within 24 hours after transplant. We compared early and late outcomes between groups.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Implantation of the temporary VAD required longer cardiopulmonary bypass time compared with VA-ECMO (323 ± 86 minutes vs 216 ± 65 minutes, p < 0.0001). Patients who received a VAD were more likely to have longer support time (14 ± 17 days vs 5.2 ± 3.9 days, p = 0.011), a higher incidence of major bleeding requiring chest reexploration (77% vs 30%, p = 0.0047), and a higher incidence of renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (53% vs 11%, p = 0.0045) after surgery. Overall hospital mortality was 27%. In-hospital mortality for VAD and VA-ECMO patients were 41% and 19%, respectively (p = 0.16). Ten patients (59%) were weaned from VAD support, and 24 (89%) were weaned from VA-ECMO support after adequate graft function recovery (p = 0.03). The 3-year post-transplant survival was 41% in the VAD group and 66% in the VA-ECMO group (p = 0.13).
CONCLUSIONS: For severe PGD, support with VA-ECMO appears to result in better clinical outcomes compared with VAD. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; heart transplantation; mechanical circulatory support; primary graft dysfunction; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28087104     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  15 in total

1.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as treatment of graft failure after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Ciro Mastroianni; Antonio Nenna; Guillaume Lebreton; Cosimo D'Alessandro; Salvatore Matteo Greco; Mario Lusini; Pascal Leprince; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 2.  Complications of Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Luciano Potena; Andreas Zuckermann; Francesco Barberini; Arezu Aliabadi-Zuckermann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Salvage of severe primary graft dysfunction following heart transplantation using extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Katalin Martits-Chalangari; Omar Hernandez; Aayla K Jamil; Huanying Qin; Joost Felius; Samuel Jacob; Brian Lima; Aldo Rafael; Gonzalo V Gonzalez-Stawinski; Melody J Sherwood; Shelley A Hall
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2018-10-18

4.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in the first 24 hours following pediatric heart transplantation: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Justin Godown; David W Bearl; Cary Thurm; Matt Hall; Brian Feingold; Jonathan H Soslow; Bret A Mettler; Andrew H Smith; Elizabeth L Profita; Tajinder P Singh; Debra A Dodd
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2019-04-11

5.  Continuous-flow mechanical circulatory support is not associated with early graft failure: An analysis of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation registry.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Donna M Mancini; Josef Stehlik; Wida S Cherikh; Lars H Lund
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 6.  The Surgeon's Role in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Alexandra E Sperry; Matthew Williams; Pavan Atluri; Wilson Y Szeto; Marisa Cevasco; Christian A Bermudez; Michael A Acker; Michael Ibrahim
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 7.  Extracorporeal life support in preoperative and postoperative heart transplant management.

Authors:  Christian A Bermudez; D Michael McMullan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-10

Review 8.  ECMO in cardiogenic shock and bridge to heart transplant.

Authors:  Mathew Jose Chakaramakkil; Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-11

9.  Financial implications of using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following heart transplantation.

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy; Vipin Mehta; William Critchley; Paul Callan; Steve Shaw; Rajamiyer Venkateswaran
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 10.  Anaesthesia for heart transplantation.

Authors:  S Edwards; S Allen; D Sidebotham
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.