Literature DB >> 23477925

Acute lung injury after mechanical circulatory support implantation in patients on extracorporeal life support: an unrecognized problem.

David Boulate1, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Matteo Pozzi, Michaela Niculescu, Alain Combes, Pascal Leprince, Matthias Kirsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We observed early acute lung injury (ALI) after a switch from veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) to long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The aim of our study was to analyse the frequency, impact on mortality and characteristics of patients presenting ALI after MCS implantation in the bridge-to-bridge (BTB) strategy.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from 55 consecutive cardiogenic shock patients who underwent a BTB strategy between January 2004 and March 2012 in our centre. ALI was defined as severe acute respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2 <200) with or without need for iterative VA-ECLS or veno-venous (VV)-exracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) occurring within 48 h of MCS implantation.
RESULTS: ALI was observed in 15 of 55 (27%) patients. Eleven patients required VV-ECMO or VA-ECLS and 4 were treated medically. The median (interquartile range) duration of support under a long-term device was 47.5 (168.8) days. Mortality while on long-term support was significantly higher in patients who developed ALI (13 of 15, 87%) than in those who did not (21 of 40, 53%; P = 0.03). Hazard ratio for death while on support in patients who developed ALI when compared with those who did not was 3.390 (95% confidence interval, 1.636-7.026, P = 0.001). Univariate risk factors for postimplant ALI included: signs of pulmonary oedema while under extracorporeal life support (ECLS) during the week preceding long-term device implantation; mechanical ventilation, the incomplete recovery of renal and hepatic functions and the number of red blood cell units transfused at the time of long-term device implantation, and use of pulsatile, biventricular support.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a long-term MCS device in patients on ECLS can result in severe ALI, which is associated with ominous outcomes. Various preimplant risk factors for ALI have been identified and might allow devising strategies to prevent this complication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute lung injury; Bridge to bridge; Cardiogenic shock; Extracorporeal life support; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Mechanical circulatory support

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23477925     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  17 in total

1.  Cardiac catheterization and percutaneous intervention procedures on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Authors:  Cesar Y Guerrero-Miranda; Shelley A Hall
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 2.  Hemodynamic adaptation of heart failure to percutaneous venoarterial extracorporeal circulatory supports.

Authors:  P Hála; O Kittnar
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 3.  The ABCDE approach to difficult weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Christiaan L Meuwese; Daniel Brodie; Dirk W Donker
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 19.334

4.  Temporary biventricular support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a feasible therapeutic approach for cardiogenic shock with multiple organ failure.

Authors:  Osamu Seguchi; Tomoyuki Fujita; Takuya Watanabe; Kensuke Kuroda; Eriko Hisamatsu; Seiko Nakajima; Takuma Sato; Haruki Sunami; Masanobu Yanase; Hiroki Hata; Junjiro Kobayashi; Takeshi Nakatani; Norihide Fukushima
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 5.  Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  P Elliott Miller; Michael A Solomon; Dorothea McAreavey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  New challenges in cardiac intensive care units.

Authors:  Enzo Lüsebrink; Antonia Kellnar; Clemens Scherer; Kathrin Krieg; Mathias Orban; Tobias Petzold; Sven Peterss; Stefan Kääb; Stefan Brunner; Daniel Braun; Christian Hagl; Jörg Hausleiter; Steffen Massberg; Martin Orban
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Financial implications of using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following heart transplantation.

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy; Vipin Mehta; William Critchley; Paul Callan; Steve Shaw; Rajamiyer Venkateswaran
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 8.  Outcomes of percutaneous temporary biventricular mechanical support: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew P Weber; Thomas J O'Malley; Jae H Choi; Elizabeth J Maynes; Kyle W Prochno; Melissa A Austin; Chelsey T Wood; Sinal Patel; Rohinton J Morris; H Todd Massey; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  The contemporary role of Impella in a comprehensive mechanical circulatory support program: a single institutional experience.

Authors:  Marina Pieri; Rachele Contri; Dario Winterton; Matteo Montorfano; Antonio Colombo; Alberto Zangrillo; Michele De Bonis; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Individualized real-time clinical decision support to monitor cardiac loading during venoarterial ECMO.

Authors:  Michael Broomé; Dirk W Donker
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.