Literature DB >> 31161036

Epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility and mortality risk factors of candidemia among critically ill patients: a retrospective study from 2011 to 2017 in a teaching hospital in China.

Zengli Xiao1, Qi Wang1, Fengxue Zhu1, Youzhong An1.   

Abstract

Background: Candidemia is still a common life-threatening disease and causes significant morbidity and mortality, especially in critically ill patients. We conducted this study to analyze the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility and mortality risk factors of candidemia in an intensive care unit.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with candidemia in the intensive care unit of our hospital from 2011 to 2017. The clinical characteristics, including clinical and laboratory data, antibiotic therapies, underlying conditions, and invasive procedures and outcomes, were analyzed. We also performed a logistic regression analysis to identify the independent risk factors for mortality.
Results: In this six-year retrospective study, we identified 82 patients with candidemia. The median age of the patients was 76 years (range, 26 years to 91 years), and 50 of the patients (61%) were male. Candida albicans was the most common fungal species (38/82, 46.3%), followed by Candida parapsilosis (16/82, 19.5%), Candida glabrata (13/82, 15.9%), and Candida tropicalis (12/82, 14.6%). Most isolates were susceptible to the antifungal agents. The all-cause mortality rate was 51.2%. In binary logistic regression analysis, the worst Glasgow coma score (GCS), PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F ratio), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) within three days after admission were independent risk factors for mortality. Conclusions: Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated fungal species. Most isolates were susceptible to the antifungal agents. The worst GCS score, P/F ratio, and MAP within three days after admission were independent risk factors for mortality due to candidemia in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antifungal susceptibility; Candidemia; Risk factors; Species distribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31161036      PMCID: PMC6542075          DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0534-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control        ISSN: 2047-2994            Impact factor:   4.887


Background

Invasive candidiasis (IC) has become a substantial threat to public health. IC affects more than 250,000 people every year and is associated with a mortality rate exceeding 70% [1-3]. Traditionally, IC has been associated with immunocompromised states, chronic inflammatory diseases and chronic immunosuppressive conditions. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, any pre-existing cause of immunosuppression, recent surgery and indwelling central venous catheters (CVC), particularly those for total parenteral nutrition, are all associated with IC [4, 5]. Therefore, the number of patients at risk of fungal infection is rising in intensive care units (ICUs), and as the third most common cause of infection in the ICU worldwide, accounting for 17% of infections, it has become a growing concern for doctors [6-8]. Thus far, more than 17 different Candida species have been identified as causative pathogens of bloodstream infections (BSIs), and Candida albicans is the dominant and most extensively studied pathogen [9, 10]. However, the proportion of non-Candida albicans strains has increased rapidly in recent years [11]. In general, more than 90% of IC are caused by C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrate and C. krusei [12, 13]. In the ICU, the treatment of IC remains a challenge. Systemic antifungal therapy is used in up to 7.5% of ICU patients, although two-thirds of these patients have no documented IC [14]. The current guidelines also recommend empiric antifungal treatment, although it often fails to confer any benefit on ICU patients [15, 16]. Therefore, the availability of local epidemiological data could help improve antifungal stewardship. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility and mortality risk factors for of candidemia in an ICU in China. We believe that knowledge of IC epidemiology, including geographical differences, is an important guide to prescribing practices and health policies and thus has far-reaching clinical implications [17].

Methods

Patients and setting

From March 2011 to September 2017, all patients with candidemia reported by the microbiological department of the ICU of Peking University People’s Hospital in China were retrospectively identified and analyzed. There are 41 beds in this general ICU. The medical records of all patients due to Candida infection were reviewed, and the following information was collected: age, sex, patient source (medical/surgical ward), underlying conditions (diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic cardiac disease, chronic liver disease, solid tumor, hematological malignancy, chronic renal dysfunction, surgery within 1 month), the worst GCS score within 3 days after admission to the ICU, previous treatment (antifungal treatment, steroid therapy, antibiotic therapy), the worst laboratory data within 3 days after admission to the ICU (P/F ratio, hemoglobin level, neutrophil count, white blood cell count, temperature, serum total protein level, serum albumin level, MAP), previous invasive procedures (central venous catheter, urinary tract catheter, total parenteral nutrition), and the worst Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score within 3 days after admission to the ICU (length of ICU, length of hospital stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation).

Definitions

We defined candidemia as the isolation of Candida species from at least one blood culture in patients with symptoms or signs of a systemic infection. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level < 70 g/l. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count < 1.5*109/l. Hypoproteinemia was defined as a total protein level < 60 g/dl or serum albumin level < 25 g/dl. Empirical antifungal therapy was defined as the administration of antifungals in patients with refractory pyrexia and other risk factors for IC before the results of antifungal sensitivity testing were obtained.

Microbiology and antifungal susceptibility testing

Isolates were collected from blood cultures using the ALERT 3D automated system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and were identified by the Vitek 2 automated system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed using the ATB FUNGUS 3 strip (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Five antifungal drugs with different concentrations, namely, 5-flucytosine, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole, were tested. After incubation at 35 °C for 24 h, the strips were read visually to determine the scores. The MICs were interpreted according to species-specific Clinical & Laboratory Standards (CLSI) M27-A3 breakpoints. C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 2019 were used as quality controls [18].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with SPSS software version 21.0. The count data were described by case number (n), and the difference between groups was tested by the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test showed that the measurement data did not conform to a normal distribution (p < 0.05). Therefore, the measurement data in this study were described by P50 (P25,P75), and a nonparametric rank sum test was used for intergroup comparison. Factors with a p < 0.05 in univariate tests were analyzed with a binary logistic regression model to identify the independent risk factors. The difference was statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics and distribution of Candida species

Eighty-two patients with candidemia were identified over a 6-year period. The median age of the patients was 76 years (range, 26 years to 91 years), and 50 patients (61%) were male. Approximately 65.9% of the patients came from the surgical ward. Surgery within 1 month (58.5%), hypertension (43.9%), and solid tumors (36.6%) were the most common underlying conditions, followed by diabetes (32.9%), chronic cardiac disease (22%), chronic renal dysfunction (20.7%), chronic liver disease (11%), hematological malignancy (6.1%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (2.4%). The median GCS score of these patients was 11. In total, 27 (32.9%) patients had received previous antifungal treatment. Fluconazole was the most frequently used empirical antifungal treatment (40/64, 62.5%). The patients’ laboratory data and previous invasive procedures are also shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of 82 patients diagnosed with IC in the ICU

N (%) or P50 (P25,P75)Mortality status (all-cause)
Survived (n = 40)Did not survive (n = 42)Z/χ2/ Fisher’s exact test P
Age (years)76.0 (65.8, 82.0)76.0 (61.3, 81.8)78.0 (67.0, 84.0)−0.673#0.501
Males50 (61.0)26 (65.0)24 (57.1)0.532*0.466
Hospital admission
 Medical ward28 (34.1)14 (35.0)14 (33.3)0.025*0.874
 Surgical ward54 (65.9)26 (65.0)28 (66.7)
Underlying conditions
 Diabetes27 (32.9)12 (30.0)15 (35.7)0.303*0.582
 Hypertension36 (43.9)14 (35.0)22 (52.4)2.513*0.113
 Chronic cardiac disease18 (22.0)7 (17.5)11 (26.2)0.903*0.342
 Chronic liver disease9 (11.0)5 (12.5)4 (9.5)0.006*0.938
 Solid tumor30 (36.6)15 (37.5)15 (35.7)0.028*0.867
 COPD2 (2.4)0 (0.0)2 (4.8)-Δ0.494
 Hematological malignancy5 (6.1)2 (5.0)3 (7.1)0.000*1.000
 Chronic renal dysfunction17 (20.7)4 (10.0)13 (31.0)5.473* 0.019
 Surgery48 (58.5)25 (62.5)23 (54.8)0.505*0.477
GCS score11.0 (9.0, 15.0)11.0 (11.0, 15.0)10.0 (6.0, 11.0)−4.225# 0.000
Previous treatment
 Antifungal treatment27 (32.9)12 (30.0)15 (35.7)0.303*0.582
 Caspofungin22 (26.8)11 (27.5)11 (26.2)0.018*0.894
 Fluconazole39 (47.6)19 (47.5)20 (47.6)0.000*0.991
 Amphotericin B2 (2.4)0 (0.0)2 (4.8)-Δ0.494
 Voriconazole32 (39.0)18 (45.0)14 (33.3)1.172*0.279
 Previous steroid therapy25 (30.5)10 (25.0)15 (35.7)1.110*0.292
 Previous antibiotic therapy63 (76.8)31 (77.5)32 (76.2)0.020*0.888
Laboratory data
 P/F ratio256.1 (188.4, 337.3)290.5 (241.5, 370.8)224.0 (130.0, 270.0)−3.553# 0.000
 Anemia (HGB < 70 g/l)27 (32.9)10 (25.0)17 (40.5)2.222*0.136
 Neutropenia (< 1 months)7 (8.5)2 (5.0)5 (11.9)0.523*0.470
 WBC > 20*109/l26 (31.7)11 (27.5)15 (35.7)0.638*0.424
 Temperature > 38 °C68 (82.9)31 (77.5)37 (88.1)1.624*0.202
 Hypoproteinemia81 (98.8)39 (97.5)42 (100.0)-Δ0.488
 MAP, mean (SD)76.7 (66.5, 90.0)85.5 (73.3, 94.5)68.0 (57.0, 78.3)−4.134# 0.000
Previous invasive procedures
 Central venous catheter13.0 (5.5, 27.0)13.0 (6.0, 25.5)14.0 (4.5, 29.5)−0.454#0.650
 Urinary tract catheter13.0 (5.0, 27.0)12.5 (5.0, 24.0)17.0 (5.5, 35.5)−1.026#0.305
 Total parenteral nutrition10.5 (3.8, 21.3)8.5 (3.3, 15.8)13.0 (4.5, 27)−1.023#0.307
 Mechanical ventilation3.5 (1.0, 10.3)2.5 (1.0, 9.5)5.50 (1.0, 15.0)−1.514#0.130
SOFA score8.0 (4.0, 11.0)5.0 (4.0, 8.0)10.0 (8.5, 14.0)−4.628# 0.000
Outcome (days)
 ICU length of stay16.0 (4.8, 51.8)16.0 (5.3, 36.3)14.5 (3.0, 66.0)−0.223#0.823
 Hospital length of stay45.0 (27.8, 81.3)40.0 (28.0, 98.0)49.0 (26.5, 81.0)−0.014#0.989
 Mechanical ventilation8.5 (1.8, 23.3)5.0 (1.0, 11.0)11.5 (3.0, 37.5)−2.461# 0.014

*: Chi-square test; #: rank sum test; Δ: Fisher’s exact test

P50 (P25,P75): the quartile summary is viewed as P25, P50, and P75. For P50, there is a 50% chance that the mean power production will not be reached at any given time

Baseline characteristics of 82 patients diagnosed with IC in the ICU *: Chi-square test; #: rank sum test; Δ: Fisher’s exact test P50 (P25,P75): the quartile summary is viewed as P25, P50, and P75. For P50, there is a 50% chance that the mean power production will not be reached at any given time

Distribution of Candida spp. causing BSIs

Candida albicans was by far the most prevalent fungal species (46.3%), followed by Candida parapsilosis (19.5%), Candida glabrata (15.9%), Candida tropicalis (14.6%), Candida dubliniensis (1.2%), Candida guilliermondii (1.2%), and Candia spp. (1.2%) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Distribution of Candida species responsible for candidiasis (n = 82). Candida albicans (n = 38), Candida parapsilosis (n = 16), Candida glabrata (n = 13), Candida tropicalis (n = 12), Candida dubliniensis (n = 1), Candida guilliermondii (n = 1), Candida spp. (n = 1)

Distribution of Candida species responsible for candidiasis (n = 82). Candida albicans (n = 38), Candida parapsilosis (n = 16), Candida glabrata (n = 13), Candida tropicalis (n = 12), Candida dubliniensis (n = 1), Candida guilliermondii (n = 1), Candida spp. (n = 1)

Susceptibilities of the isolates

The in vitro antifungal susceptibility of the isolated Candida species is presented in Fig. 2. Overall, most isolates were susceptible to the antifungals. C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parasilosis were highly susceptible to all antifungal agents, whereas the other Candida species had low levels of susceptibility to fluconazole and itraconazole. Itraconazole had the highest drug resistance rate, while no species showed resistance to amphotericin B.
Fig. 2

In vitro susceptibility data for the Candida spp. a Others include Candida dubliniensis (n = 1), Candida guilliermondii (n = 1), and Candia (n = 1). S = susceptible; I = intermediate; R = resistant

In vitro susceptibility data for the Candida spp. a Others include Candida dubliniensis (n = 1), Candida guilliermondii (n = 1), and Candia (n = 1). S = susceptible; I = intermediate; R = resistant

Outcomes and risk factors for mortality

The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate of the 82 patients was 42/82 (51.2%). In univariate analyses, increased mortality was associated with chronic renal dysfunction, GCS score, P/F ratio, MAP, and SOFA score, as shown in Table 1. The median ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay were 16 days and 45 days respectively. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 8.5 days and the survived group was significant less than died group (Table 1). In binary logistic regression analysis, the worst value of GCS score, P/F ratio, MAP within three days after admission were independent risk factors for mortality (Table 2).
Table 2

Risk factors for mortality

BWaldORCIP
Chronic renal dysfunction1.4582.6644.2990.746–24.7720.103
GCS score−0.2564.4080.7740.610–0.9830.036
P/F ratio−0.0064.8620.9940.988–0.9990.027
MAP−0.0465.2200.9550.919–0.9940.022
SOFA score0.1141.4311.1210.930–1.3520.232

B:coefficient estimates; Wald: Chi-square value; OR: Odds ratio; CI;Confidence interval

Risk factors for mortality B:coefficient estimates; Wald: Chi-square value; OR: Odds ratio; CI;Confidence interval

Discussion

We report a 6-year retrospective study of candidemia at the Peking University People’s Hospital, a teaching hospital in China. We not only focused on the main epidemiological characteristics, such as risk factors and antifungal agent use, but we also obtained a complete overview of candidemia, including Candida species identification, antifungal resistance determination and patient outcome analysis. The mean age of patients in our study was older than the mean ages in previous studies, possibly because we mainly focused on critically ill patients; critically ill patients are often older than other patients [2, 19, 20]. Similar to other studies, C. albicans was the most common species causing candidemia, followed by C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis [21-25]. This may be due to increasing numbers of surgeries, the aging of the population, and the increasing use of antifungal agents. Susceptibility testing for antifungal drugs was performed for all isolates of Candida species. In our study, fluconazole was active against C. albicans, but a trend towards increased resistance or the emergence of naturally resistant species was observed among other Candida spp., implying that fluconazole could be used in patients with Candida albicans as a first-line agent [26]. For patients infected with other Candida spp., fluconazole should be used according to the results of the susceptibility test. Amphotericin B demonstrated excellent activity against all Candida species. Resistance to itraconazole was relatively more common in all Candida species, which was consistent with the findings of other studies [27]. These findings should be taken into consideration when establishing antifungal treatment strategies. Invasive Candida infection in the ICU is an increasing concern due to its high associated mortality rate and resource consumption. According to previous studies, invasive Candida infection is associated with mortality rates of 35–80% in the ICU [28-31]. The all-cause mortality of patients with candidemia in our study was 51.2%, which is within the range of previously reported mortality rates [32, 33]. The mean time between diagnosis and death was 16.7 days. The ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay for candidemia patients were much longer than those for general ICU patients [34]. In univariate analyses, increased mortality was associated with chronic renal dysfunction, GCS score, P/F ratio, MAP, and SOFA score, as shown in Table 1. The median ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay were 16 days and 45 days, respectively. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 8.5 days, and the duration was significantly shorter in the surviving group was significantly less than the nonsurviving group (Table 1). In binary logistic regression analysis, the worst GCS score, P/F ratio, and MAP within 3 days after admission were independent risk factors for mortality. In our study, most of the patients had long durations of central venous catheterization, urinary tract catheterization, and mechanical ventilation, which have been shown to be responsible for fungal infections [10, 35, 36]. In our study, the statistical analysis failed to confirm an association between these invasive procedures (CVC, urinary catheter) and mortality. The reason may be that 91.5% of the patients in our study continuously had a central venous catheter (95% for urinary catheter) in the ICU, making the groups of patients without a central catheter or without a urinary catheter too small for comparison. A previous study showed that catheter removal could reduce the incidence of candidemia. Therefore, if these catheters are suspected to be the source of candidemia, we should try to decrease the utilization of these invasive devices and remove these catheters as early as possible [14, 37]. In our study, 32.9% of patients received empirical antifungal therapy, which was similar to the result of a previous study. Current guidelines recommend empiric antifungal therapy; however, this often fails to provide any benefit to ICU patients and may result in significant overtreatment [16]. The limitations of this study must be acknowledged. This was a single-center retrospective study, so the results may not be generalizable to all patients with candidemia. The epidemiological findings in our institution will pave the way for more in-depth studies and help us establish better antifungal stewardship in our hospital.

Conclusion

C. albicans was the most frequently isolated fungal species. Most isolates were susceptible to the antifungal agents. The worst GCS score, P/F ratio, and MAP within three days after admission were independent risk factors for mortality due to candidemia among critically ill patients. Further multicenter studies in different geographical regions on candidemia in critically ill patients should be conducted to help intensive care specialists assess the distribution and trends in their patients with suspected fungal infections.
  35 in total

1.  Focus on infection and sepsis in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Risk factors for candidemia-related mortality at a medical center in central Taiwan.

Authors:  Yu-Ren Cheng; Li-Chen Lin; Tzuu-Guang Young; Chun-Eng Liu; Chang-Hua Chen; Ren-Wen Tsay
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.399

Review 3.  Relative frequency of albicans and the various non-albicans Candida spp among candidemia isolates from inpatients in various parts of the world: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Nikos Roussos; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Epidemiology and outcomes of candidemia in 2019 patients: data from the prospective antifungal therapy alliance registry.

Authors:  David L Horn; Dionissios Neofytos; Elias J Anaissie; Jay A Fishman; William J Steinbach; Ali J Olyaei; Kieren A Marr; Michael A Pfaller; Chi-Hsing Chang; Karen M Webster
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Epidemiology of candidemia in Swiss tertiary care hospitals: secular trends, 1991-2000.

Authors:  Oscar Marchetti; Jacques Bille; Ursula Fluckiger; Philippe Eggimann; Christian Ruef; Jorge Garbino; Thierry Calandra; Michel-Pierre Glauser; Martin George Täuber; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Epidemiological changes with potential implication for antifungal prescription recommendations for fungaemia: data from a nationwide fungaemia surveillance programme.

Authors:  M C Arendrup; E Dzajic; R H Jensen; H K Johansen; P Kjaeldgaard; J D Knudsen; L Kristensen; C Leitz; L E Lemming; L Nielsen; B Olesen; F S Rosenvinge; B L Røder; H C Schønheyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Candidemia in patients with hematologic malignancies in the era of new antifungal agents (2001-2007): stable incidence but changing epidemiology of a still frequently lethal infection.

Authors:  Nikolaos V Sipsas; Russell E Lewis; Jeffrey Tarrand; Ray Hachem; Kenneth V Rolston; Issam I Raad; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Clinical manifestations of candidemia caused by uncommon Candida species and antifungal susceptibility of the isolates in a regional hospital in Taiwan, 2007-2014.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Liu; Chih-Cheng Lai; Ming-Chi Li; Chi-Jung Wu; Wen-Chien Ko; Yi-Li Hung; Hung-Jen Tang; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.399

9.  Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David R Andes; Cornelius J Clancy; Kieren A Marr; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; Mindy G Schuster; Jose A Vazquez; Thomas J Walsh; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: Candida infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Marie Méan; Oscar Marchetti; Thierry Calandra
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pink oyster mushroom Pleurotus flabellatus mycelium produced by an airlift bioreactor-the evidence of potent in vitro biological activities.

Authors:  Anita Klaus; Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar; Biljana Nikolić; Stefana Cvetković; Jovana Vunduk
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Antibiofilm Activity of Essential Fatty Acids Against Candida albicans from Vulvovaginal Candidiasis and Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Peng Wang; Jun Liu; Chunxia Yang; Qiangyi Wang; Mingze Su; Ming Wei; Li Gu
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Development of a Multiplex PCR Short Tandem Repeat Typing Scheme for Candida krusei.

Authors:  Merlijn H I van Haren; Theun de Groot; Bram Spruijtenburg; Kusum Jain; Anuradha Chowdhary; Jacques F Meis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 11.677

4.  SpRY Cas9 Can Utilize a Variety of Protospacer Adjacent Motif Site Sequences To Edit the Candida albicans Genome.

Authors:  Ben A Evans; Douglas A Bernstein
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.389

5.  Prevalence and Antifungal Susceptibility of Pathogenic Yeasts in China: A 10-Year Retrospective Study in a Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Yinggai Song; Xianlian Chen; Yan Yan; Zhe Wan; Wei Liu; Ruoyu Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Clinical Profile of Non-neutropenic Patients with Invasive Candidiasis: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Sowmya Sridharan; Ram Gopalakrishnan; Panchatcharam S Nambi; Suresh Kumar; Nandini Sethuraman; V Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-03

7.  Candida Isolates From Blood and Other Normally Sterile Foci From ICU Patients: Determination of Epidemiology, Antifungal Susceptibility Profile and Evaluation of Associated Risk Factors.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Xinlong He; Feng Lu; Yajuan Li; Yuerong Wang; Min Zhang; Ying Huang; Jinxing Xia
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-11

8.  Cross-Sectional Study of Candidemia from Isfahan, Iran: Etiologic Agents, Predisposing Factors, and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Maryam Ranjbar-Mobarake; Jamileh Nowroozi; Parisa Badiee; Sayed Nassereddin Mostafavi; Rasoul Mohammadi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  A seven-year surveillance study of the epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, risk factors and mortality of candidaemia among paediatric and adult inpatients in a tertiary teaching hospital in China.

Authors:  Zhangrui Zeng; Yinhuan Ding; Gang Tian; Kui Yang; Jian Deng; Guangrong Li; Jinbo Liu
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.887

10.  A Comparative Study of the in Vitro Antimicrobial and Synergistic Effect of Essential Oils from Laurus nobilis L. and Prunus armeniaca L. from Morocco with Antimicrobial Drugs: New Approach for Health Promoting Products.

Authors:  Ahmed Nafis; Ayoub Kasrati; Chaima Alaoui Jamali; Luísa Custódio; Sara Vitalini; Marcello Iriti; Lahcen Hassani
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.