Burcu Basar1, Merdim Sonmez1, Dursun Korel Yildirim2, Ram Paul3, Daniel A Herzka1, Ozgur Kocaturk2, Robert J Lederman1, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn4. 1. Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA. 4. Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: adrienne.campbell@nih.gov.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Visualization of passive devices during MRI-guided catheterizations often relies on a susceptibility artifact from the device itself or added susceptibility markers that impart a unique imaging signature. High-performance low field MRI systems offer reduced RF-induced heating of metallic devices during MRI-guided invasive procedures, but susceptibility artifacts are expected to diminish with field strength, reducing device visualization. In this study, field strength and orientation dependence of artifacts from susceptibility markers and metallic guidewires were evaluated using a prototype high-performance 0.55 T MRI system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artifact volume from nitinol and stainless steel passive susceptibility markers was quantified using histogram analysis of pixel intensities from three-dimensional gradient echo images at 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3 T. In addition, visibility of commercially available clinical catheterization devices was compared between 0.55 T and 1.5 T using real-time bSSFP in phantoms and in vivo. RESULTS: A low-tensile strength stainless-steel marker produced field strength- and orientation-dependent artifact size (1.7 cm3, 1.95 cm3, 2.21 cm3 at 0.55 T, 1.5 T, 3 T, respectively). Whereas, a high-tensile strength steel marker, of the same alloy, produced field strength- and orientation-independent artifact size (3.35 cm3, 3.41 cm3, 3.42 cm3 at 0.55 T, 1.5 T, 3 T, respectively). Visibility of commercially available nitinol guidewires was reduced at 0.55 T, but imaging signature could be maintained using high-susceptibility stainless steel markers. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: High-susceptibility stainless-steel markers generate field-independent artifacts between 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3 T, indicating magnetic saturation at fields <0.55 T. Thus, artifact size can be tailored such that interventional devices produce identical imaging signatures across field strengths.
INTRODUCTION: Visualization of passive devices during MRI-guided catheterizations often relies on a susceptibility artifact from the device itself or added susceptibility markers that impart a unique imaging signature. High-performance low field MRI systems offer reduced RF-induced heating of metallic devices during MRI-guided invasive procedures, but susceptibility artifacts are expected to diminish with field strength, reducing device visualization. In this study, field strength and orientation dependence of artifacts from susceptibility markers and metallic guidewires were evaluated using a prototype high-performance 0.55 T MRI system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artifact volume from nitinol and stainless steel passive susceptibility markers was quantified using histogram analysis of pixel intensities from three-dimensional gradient echo images at 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3 T. In addition, visibility of commercially available clinical catheterization devices was compared between 0.55 T and 1.5 T using real-time bSSFP in phantoms and in vivo. RESULTS: A low-tensile strength stainless-steel marker produced field strength- and orientation-dependent artifact size (1.7 cm3, 1.95 cm3, 2.21 cm3 at 0.55 T, 1.5 T, 3 T, respectively). Whereas, a high-tensile strength steel marker, of the same alloy, produced field strength- and orientation-independent artifact size (3.35 cm3, 3.41 cm3, 3.42 cm3 at 0.55 T, 1.5 T, 3 T, respectively). Visibility of commercially available nitinol guidewires was reduced at 0.55 T, but imaging signature could be maintained using high-susceptibility stainless steel markers. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: High-susceptibility stainless-steel markers generate field-independent artifacts between 0.55 T, 1.5 T and 3 T, indicating magnetic saturation at fields <0.55 T. Thus, artifact size can be tailored such that interventional devices produce identical imaging signatures across field strengths.
Authors: Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Rajiv Ramasawmy; Matthew C Restivo; Ipshita Bhattacharya; Burcu Basar; Daniel A Herzka; Michael S Hansen; Toby Rogers; W Patricia Bandettini; Delaney R McGuirt; Christine Mancini; David Grodzki; Rainer Schneider; Waqas Majeed; Himanshu Bhat; Hui Xue; Joel Moss; Ashkan A Malayeri; Elizabeth C Jones; Alan P Koretsky; Peter Kellman; Marcus Y Chen; Robert J Lederman; Robert S Balaban Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Philipp Sommer; Matthias Grothoff; Charlotte Eitel; Thomas Gaspar; Christopher Piorkowski; Matthias Gutberlet; Gerhard Hindricks Journal: Europace Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Burcu Basar; Toby Rogers; Kanishka Ratnayaka; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Jonathan R Mazal; William H Schenke; Merdim Sonmez; Anthony Z Faranesh; Robert J Lederman; Ozgur Kocaturk Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 5.364