Literature DB >> 16510948

Development and testing of passive tracking markers for different field strengths and tracking speeds.

J M Peeters1, J-H Seppenwoolde, L W Bartels, C J G Bakker.   

Abstract

Susceptibility markers for passive tracking need to be small in order to maintain the shape and mechanical properties of the endovascular device. Nevertheless, they also must have a high magnetic moment to induce an adequate artefact at a variety of scan techniques, tracking speeds and, preferably, field strengths. Paramagnetic markers do not satisfy all of these requirements. Ferro- and ferrimagnetic materials were therefore investigated with a vibrating sample magnetometer and compared with the strongly paramagnetic dysprosium oxide. Results indicated that the magnetic behaviour of stainless steel type AISI 410 corresponds the best with ideal marker properties. Markers with different magnetic moments were constructed and tested in in vitro and in vivo experiments. The appearance of the corresponding artefacts was field strength independent above magnetic saturation of 1.5 T. Generally, the contrast-to-noise ratio decreased at increasing tracking speed and decreasing magnetic moment. Device depiction was most consistent at a frame rate of 20 frames per second.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16510948     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/N04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

Review 1.  Catheter ablation guided by real-time MRI.

Authors:  Charlotte Eitel; Gerhard Hindricks; Matthias Grothoff; Matthias Gutberlet; Philipp Sommer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Susceptibility artifacts from metallic markers and cardiac catheterization devices on a high-performance 0.55 T MRI system.

Authors:  Burcu Basar; Merdim Sonmez; Dursun Korel Yildirim; Ram Paul; Daniel A Herzka; Ozgur Kocaturk; Robert J Lederman; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vascular interventions.

Authors:  Cengizhan Ozturk; Michael Guttman; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10

4.  Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance imaging for catheter guidance in electrophysiology studies.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; Ritsushi Kato; Robert C Susil; Ariel Roguin; Timm L Dickfeld; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Albert C Lardo; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Passive Catheter Tracking for Endovascular Therapy.

Authors:  Fabio Settecase; Alastair J Martin; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron Losey; Steven W Hetts
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  Magnetic retraction of bowel by intraluminal injectable cyanoacrylate-based magnetic glue.

Authors:  Zhigang Wang; Andrew Brown; Pascal André; Stuart I Brown; Gordon J Florence; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Optimised passive marker device visibility and automatic marker detection for 3-T MRI-guided endovascular interventions: a pulsatile flow phantom study.

Authors:  Han Nijsink; Christiaan G Overduin; Patrick Brand; Sytse F De Jong; Paul J A Borm; Michiel C Warlé; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-02-24

8.  Noninvasively characterizing the different alphavbeta3 expression patterns in lung cancers with RGD-USPIO using a clinical 3.0T MR scanner.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Chunfu Zhang; Xuan Zheng; Xiongfei Xu; Xuan Xie; Hongchao Liu; Shiyuan Liu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2009
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.