Loren A Martin1, Fang-Wei Hsu1, Brooke Herd1, Michael Gregg2, Hannah Sample3, Jason Kaplan4. 1. Department of Graduate Psychology, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA, USA. 3. Center for Next-Gen Precision Diagnostics, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Coatesville, PA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Agenesis of the corpus callosum (AgCC) is characterized by the congenital partial or complete absence of the corpus callosum. Several strains of mice have been reported to carry AgCC, with the BTBR T+ Itpr3tf /J (BTBR) inbred mouse strain consistently showing a complete absence of the corpus callosum, as well as a variable reduction in the size of the hippocampal commissure. While much research has focused on the social deficits of the BTBR strain, little research on its cognitive behavior has been conducted. The goal of our study was to compare two facets of executive functioning, spatial working memory, and sustained attention between the BTBR and C57BL/6J (B6) strains. METHODS: Spatial working memory was measured utilizing a delayed matching-to-position (DMTP) task and sustained attention was measured utilizing an operant task in which mice were trained to distinguish signal and nonsignal events. RESULTS: Both the BTBR and B6 mice demonstrated a predictable decline in performance on the DMTP task as the delay interval increased and predictable increase in performance on the sustained attention task as the duration of the signal event increased. Although no significant differences were found between strains on the performance of these tasks, there was a significant difference in learning the association between lever pressing and food reward. Histological investigation confirmed the complete absence of commissural fibers from the corpus callosum, but also the hippocampal commissure, counter to a previous study. CONCLUSION: The results suggest spatial working memory and sustained attention are unaffected by the absence of these commissural fibers alone.
INTRODUCTION: Agenesis of the corpus callosum (AgCC) is characterized by the congenital partial or complete absence of the corpus callosum. Several strains of mice have been reported to carry AgCC, with the BTBR T+ Itpr3tf /J (BTBR) inbred mouse strain consistently showing a complete absence of the corpus callosum, as well as a variable reduction in the size of the hippocampal commissure. While much research has focused on the social deficits of the BTBR strain, little research on its cognitive behavior has been conducted. The goal of our study was to compare two facets of executive functioning, spatial working memory, and sustained attention between the BTBR and C57BL/6J (B6) strains. METHODS: Spatial working memory was measured utilizing a delayed matching-to-position (DMTP) task and sustained attention was measured utilizing an operant task in which mice were trained to distinguish signal and nonsignal events. RESULTS: Both the BTBR and B6mice demonstrated a predictable decline in performance on the DMTP task as the delay interval increased and predictable increase in performance on the sustained attention task as the duration of the signal event increased. Although no significant differences were found between strains on the performance of these tasks, there was a significant difference in learning the association between lever pressing and food reward. Histological investigation confirmed the complete absence of commissural fibers from the corpus callosum, but also the hippocampal commissure, counter to a previous study. CONCLUSION: The results suggest spatial working memory and sustained attention are unaffected by the absence of these commissural fibers alone.
Authors: B L Pearson; R L H Pobbe; E B Defensor; L Oasay; V J Bolivar; D C Blanchard; R J Blanchard Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: S Santo; F D'Antonio; T Homfray; P Rich; G Pilu; A Bhide; B Thilaganathan; A T Papageorghiou Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: V Siffredi; M M Spencer-Smith; P Barrouillet; M J Vaessen; R J Leventer; V Anderson; P Vuilleumier Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2017-09-09 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Sarah Durston; Nim T Tottenham; Kathleen M Thomas; Matthew C Davidson; Inge-Marie Eigsti; Yihong Yang; Aziz M Ulug; B J Casey Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382