Literature DB >> 23024003

Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum.

S Santo1, F D'Antonio, T Homfray, P Rich, G Pilu, A Bhide, B Thilaganathan, A T Papageorghiou.   

Abstract

In this Review, we aim to provide up-to-date and evidence-based answers to common questions regarding the diagnosis and prognosis of prenatally detected agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC). A systematic literature search was performed to identify all reports of ACC and reference lists of articles were identified. ACC involves partial or complete absence of the main commissural pathway that connects the two cerebral hemispheres, and can be isolated (with no other abnormalities) or complex (coexisting with other abnormalities). It is a rare finding and the prevalence is difficult to estimate because of selection bias in reported series. The corpus callosum (CC) can be assessed on ultrasound by direct visualization, but indirect features, such as ventriculomegaly, absence of the cavum septi pellucidi or widening of interhemispheric fissure, are often the reason for detection in a screening population. Careful imaging in a center with a high level of expertise is required to make a full assessment and to exclude coexisting abnormalities, which occur in about 46% of fetuses. When available, magnetic resonance imaging appears to be an important adjunct as it allows direct visualization. It can reduce false-positive rates on ultrasound and can confirm ACC, it can assess whether this is complete or partial and it can help in detecting coexisting brain abnormalities not seen on ultrasound. The overall rate of chromosomal abnormality in fetuses with ACC is 18%, but this high rate includes both isolated and complex ACC; more recent studies suggest that chromosomal abnormalities are rare in isolated cases. Nevertheless, postnatal follow-up studies suggest that about 15% of cases thought to be isolated prenatally were found to have associated abnormalities after birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome in isolated ACC was recently reported in a systematic review and suggested normal outcome in about 65-75% of cases. Findings need to be considered in light of the several limitations of existing studies, in terms of study design, selection bias, varying definitions and imaging protocols, ascertainment bias and lack of control groups. These uncertainties mean that antenatal counseling is difficult and further large prospective studies are needed.
Copyright © 2012 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23024003     DOI: 10.1002/uog.12315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  19 in total

1.  Variability of Forebrain Commissures in Callosal Agenesis: A Prenatal MR Imaging Study.

Authors:  C Cesaretti; M Nanni; T Ghi; C Parazzini; G Conte; E Contro; G Grisolia; A Righini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes.

Authors:  Timothy J Edwards; Elliott H Sherr; A James Barkovich; Linda J Richards
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Antenatal diagnosis and outcome of agenesis of corpus callosum: A retrospective review of 33 cases.

Authors:  Ozgür Ozyüncü; Aslıhan Yazıcıoğlu; Mert Turğal
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-03-01

4.  Fetal Brain Anomalies Associated with Ventriculomegaly or Asymmetry: An MRI-Based Study.

Authors:  E Barzilay; O Bar-Yosef; S Dorembus; R Achiron; E Katorza
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Agenesis of the corpus callosum and autism: a comprehensive comparison.

Authors:  Lynn K Paul; Christina Corsello; Daniel P Kennedy; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Agenesis of the corpus callosum. An autopsy study in fetuses.

Authors:  Debora Kidron; Daniel Shapira; Liat Ben Sira; Gustavo Malinger; Dorit Lev; Andreea Cioca; Reuven Sharony; Tally Lerman Sagie
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Clinical manifestations in children and adolescents with corpus callosum abnormalities.

Authors:  Lucia Margari; Roberto Palumbi; Maria Gloria Campa; Francesca Felicia Operto; Maura Buttiglione; Francesco Craig; Sara Matricardi; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Morphometric variability of neuroimaging features in children with agenesis of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  Jason Bennett Neal; Christopher G Filippi; Richard Mayeux
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Ultrasound measurement of the corpus callosum and neural development.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  False positive morphologic diagnoses at the anomaly scan: marginal or real problem, a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Debost-Legrand; Hélène Laurichesse-Delmas; Christine Francannet; Isabelle Perthus; Didier Lémery; Denis Gallot; Françoise Vendittelli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.