| Literature DB >> 33294140 |
V V Babenko1, A Millard2, E E Kulikov3, N N Spasskaya4, M A Letarova3, D N Konanov1, I S Belalov3, A V Letarov3,5.
Abstract
The viromes of the mammalian lower gut were shown to be heavily dominated by bacteriophages; however, only for humans were the composition and intervariability of the bacteriophage communities studied in depth. Here we present an ecogenomics survey of dsDNA bacteriophage diversity in the feces of horses (Equus caballus), comparing two groups of stabled horses, and a further group of feral horses that were isolated on an island. Our results indicate that the dsDNA viromes of the horse feces feature higher richness than in human viromes, with more even distribution of genotypes. No over-represented phage genotypes, such as CrAssphage-related viruses found in humans, were identified. Additionally, many bacteriophage genus-level clusters were found to be present in all three geographically isolated populations. The diversity of the horse intestinal bacteriophages is severely undersampled, and so consequently only a minor fraction of the phage contigs could be linked with the bacteriophage genomes. Our study indicates that bacteriophage ecological parameters in the intestinal ecosystems in horses and humans differ significantly, leading them to shape their corresponding viromes in different ways. Therefore, the diversity and structure of the intestinal virome in different animal species needs to be experimentally studied.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteriophage diversity; Bacteriophage metagenomics; Equus caballus; Horse feces; Intestinal viromes; dsDNA bacteriophages
Year: 2020 PMID: 33294140 PMCID: PMC7691681 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J ISSN: 2001-0370 Impact factor: 7.271
Fig. 1Sample processing workflow.
Fig. 2Individual viromes richness. The curves represent the cumulative fraction of the reads recruited by the contigs plotted against the cumulative length of the contigs. Contigs were sorted by CPM, taken as a proxy for their relative abundance. The dotted lines on the panel with the all the samples combined indicate the modelling function fitted to each of the curves. The distribution of the Shannon and Simpson diversity indexes in the samples from each population are plotted as box and whisker plots as inserts of respective panels.
Fig. 3Network graph produced using vCONTACT 2. Red dots – bacteriophage reference sequences, retrieved from GenBank, green dots – the horse viromes contigs. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 4Individuality of horse fecal viromes. A – Jaccard’s distances between the samples. B. Abundance of contigs in different samples.
Fig. 5Composition of viromes in the different horse populations. A – distribution of the contigs detected in three populations. B. – distribution of the VC clusters between the populations. C. – distribution of the VCs, detected in 50% or more of the samples at least in one of three populations. D. – distribution of the contigs, detected in 50% or more of the samples at least in one of three populations.
Fig. 6Comparison of the samples by abundance of genus-level 16S bacterial OTUs (top) and by predicted host of phage contigs. Only the OTUs or genera overlapping between the 16S sequencing results and viral host prediction are shown in color. Other OTUs are shown in gray scale.