Literature DB >> 15658717

Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners.

Anne Cutler1, Andrea Weber, Roel Smits, Nicole Cooper.   

Abstract

Native American English and non-native (Dutch) listeners identified either the consonant or the vowel in all possible American English CV and VC syllables. The syllables were embedded in multispeaker babble at three signal-to-noise ratios (0, 8, and 16 dB). The phoneme identification performance of the non-native listeners was less accurate than that of the native listeners. All listeners were adversely affected by noise. With these isolated syllables, initial segments were harder to identify than final segments. Crucially, the effects of language background and noise did not interact; the performance asymmetry between the native and non-native groups was not significantly different across signal-to-noise ratios. It is concluded that the frequently reported disproportionate difficulty of non-native listening under disadvantageous conditions is not due to a disproportionate increase in phoneme misidentifications.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15658717     DOI: 10.1121/1.1810292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  39 in total

1.  Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perception of Place of Articulation for Plosives and Fricatives in Noise.

Authors:  Abeer Alwan; Jintao Jiang; Willa Chen
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  Perception of silent-center syllables by native and non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Catherine L Rogers; Alexandra S Lopez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Adaptation to frozen babble in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Robert Albert Felty; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Misperceptions of spoken words: data from a random sample of American English words.

Authors:  Robert Albert Felty; Adam Buchwald; Thomas M Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perception of Native English Reduced Forms in Adverse Environments by Chinese Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Simpson W L Wong; Jenny K Y Tsui; Bonnie Wing-Yin Chow; Vina W H Leung; Peggy Mok; Kevin Kien-Hoa Chung
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

7.  Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech.

Authors:  Melissa M Baese-Berk; Ann R Bradlow; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Training-induced pattern-specific phonetic adjustments by first and second language listeners.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Ann Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-04-21

9.  Effects of stimulus bandwidth on the imitation of ish fricatives by normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Kanae Nishi; Sangsook Choi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia Dierking; Andrew Lotto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.