Literature DB >> 33261735

Tibiofemoral helical axis of motion during the full gait cycle measured using biplane radiography.

Tom Gale1, William Anderst2.   

Abstract

The helical axis of motion (HAM), which describes the simultaneous multiplanar translations and rotations that occur within a joint, has been proposed as a single measure to characterize dynamic joint function. The objective of this study was to determine the tibiofemoral HAM during 5 discrete phases of gait. Thirty-nine knees from 20 healthy adults were imaged using high-speed biplane radiography during treadmill walking. The primary outcome measures were the intersection of the HAM with the sagittal plane of the femur, and the direction of the HAM. The intersection point translated an average of 12.7 ± 5.5% of femur condyle depth in the anterior-posterior direction and 28.6 ± 13.3% of femur condyle height in the proximal-distal direction during gait. The anterior/posterior and proximal/distal components of the HAM vector were greater during stance (5.6°±3.8° and 11.1°±5.0°, respectively) than during swing (2.0°±1.1° and 6.4°±3.8°, respectively) (p<0.001) reflecting greater coupled rotations during stance. No significant side-to-side differences in intersection point location or HAM orientation were found during any of the 5 phases of gait (max difference 4.1 ± 3.4% of femur condyle depth and 13.1 ± 16.7% of femur condyle height; 12.7°±12.3° proximal/distal and 4.2°±4.5° anterior/posterior direction). Loading significantly affected HAM location and orientation (p<0.001). Knowledge of healthy knee HAM and typical side-to-side differences during gait can serve as a baseline for evaluating knee motion after clinical interventions.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Finite helical axis; Gait; Helical axis of motion; Kinematics; Knee; Screw home mechanism

Year:  2020        PMID: 33261735      PMCID: PMC7710980          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  38 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics.

Authors:  N Bogduk; S Mercer
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running.

Authors:  Scott Tashman; Patricia Kolowich; David Collon; Kyle Anderson; William Anderst
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Ligament length patterns, strength, and rotational axes of the knee joint.

Authors:  P S Trent; P S Walker; B Wolf
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Articular-surface-based automatic anatomical coordinate systems for the knee bones.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Renault; Gaëtan Aüllo-Rasser; Mathias Donnez; Sébastien Parratte; Patrick Chabrand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  In vivo six-degree-of-freedom knee-joint kinematics in overground and treadmill walking following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shanyuanye Guan; Hans A Gray; Anthony G Schache; Julian Feller; Richard de Steiger; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics.

Authors:  H J Woltring; R Huiskes; A de Lange; F E Veldpaus
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Femoral tunnel position in chronic anterior cruciate ligament rupture reconstruction: randomized controlled trial comparing anatomic, biomechanical and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Joan Minguell; Jorge H Nuñez; M M Reverte-Vinaixa; A Sallent; A Gargallo-Margarit; E Castellet
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-03

8.  Sensitivity, reliability and accuracy of the instant center of rotation calculation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.

Authors:  Emma Baillargeon; William J Anderst
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Three-dimensional MRI-based statistical shape model and application to a cohort of knees with acute ACL injury.

Authors:  V Pedoia; D A Lansdown; M Zaid; C E McCulloch; R Souza; C B Ma; X Li
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  2 in total

1.  Wearables-Only Analysis of Muscle and Joint Mechanics: An EMG-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Reed D Gurchiek; Nicole Donahue; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  The Influence of Mathematical Definitions on Patellar Kinematics Representations.

Authors:  Adrian Sauer; Maeruan Kebbach; Allan Maas; William M Mihalko; Thomas M Grupp
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.