Literature DB >> 10946096

Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics.

N Bogduk1, S Mercer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This review constitutes the first of four reviews that systematically address contemporary knowledge about the mechanical behavior of the cervical vertebrae and the soft-tissues of the cervical spine, under normal conditions and under conditions that result in minor or major injuries. This first review considers the normal kinematics of the cervical spine, which predicates the appreciation of the biomechanics of cervical spine injury. It summarizes the cardinal anatomical features of the cervical spine that determine how the cervical vertebrae and their joints behave. The results are collated of multiple studies that have measured the range of motion of individual joints of the cervical spine. However, modern studies are highlighted that reveal that, even under normal conditions, range of motion is not consistent either in time or according to the direction of motion. As well, detailed studies are summarized that reveal the order of movement of individual vertebrae as the cervical spine flexes or extends. The review concludes with an account of the location of instantaneous centres of rotation and their biological basis. RELEVANCE: The fact and precepts covered in this review underlie many observations that are critical to comprehending how the cervical spine behaves under adverse conditions, and how it might be injured. Forthcoming reviews draw on this information to explain how injuries might occur in situations where hitherto it was believed that no injury was possible, or that no evidence of injury could be detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946096     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00034-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  100 in total

1.  The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  A systematic review of the use of expandable cages in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Benjamin D Elder; Sheng-Fu Lo; Thomas A Kosztowski; C Rory Goodwin; Ioan A Lina; John E Locke; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Cervical range of motion and strength in 4,293 young male adults with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Max Daniel Kauther; Michael Piotrowski; Bjoern Hussmann; Sven Lendemans; Christian Wedemeyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervical spine functional anatomy and the biomechanics of injury due to compressive loading.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; R T Floyd; Mike Cendoma
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The quantitative measurements of the intervertebral angulation and translation during cervical flexion and extension.

Authors:  Shyi-Kuen Wu; Li-Chieh Kuo; Haw-Chang H Lan; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chiung-Ling Chen; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  C1-C2 arthrodesis after transoral odontoidectomy and suboccipital craniectomy for ventral brain stem compression in Chiari I patients.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Carl B Heilman; Ron I Riesenburger; James Kryzanski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The relationship between negative metacognitive thoughts, pain catastrophizing and adjustment to chronic pain.

Authors:  M S Ziadni; J A Sturgeon; B D Darnall
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Effects of orthoses on three-dimensional load-displacement properties of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Computer simulation of lumbar flexion shows shear of the facet capsular ligament.

Authors:  Amy A Claeson; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.

Authors:  William Anderst; Emma Baillargeon; William Donaldson; Joon Lee; James Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.