Literature DB >> 33252855

Alteration of circulating microbiome and its associated regulation role in rheumatoid arthritis: Evidence from integration of multiomics data.

Xing-Bo Mo1,2, Chen-Yue Dong1,2, Pei He1,2, Long-Fei Wu1,2, Xin Lu1,2, Yong-Hong Zhang2,3, Hong-Wen Deng4, Fei-Yan Deng1,2, Shu-Feng Lei1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33252855      PMCID: PMC7668190          DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Med        ISSN: 2001-1326


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by symmetric polyarthritis and the presence of autoantibodies. Recent studies have shown that blood is not as sterile as previously supposed, , and blood microbial dysbiosis is implicated in the pathogenesis of some diseases, , but not reported in RA. Our previously identified RA‐associated interferon‐inducible gene network has strongly implicated that the circulation microbial dysbiosis probably is served as an important RA‐associated environmental factor. To identify the alterations of circulating microbiome associated with RA and its regulation role, we generated and integrated three omics datasets (microbiome, methylome, and transcriptome) from the same subjects, described the composition and richness of blood bacteria between RA cases and controls, identified significant RA‐associated taxa, and performed in‐depth correlation analysis and causal inference test to evaluate regulation role of the detected bacteria community on the pathogenesis of RA. A total of 28 female patients and 15 age‐ and sex‐matched controls (Table S1) were enrolled according to several steps detailed in the Supporting Information. We determined blood microbiome by bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing. The 1352 OTUs detected could be classified into 12 phyla, 26 classes, 54 orders, 115 families, and 216 genera (Table S2). Among the 10 known phyla, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Candidatus Saccharibacteria, and Firmicutes have average relative abundances of 77.56% (predominated), 13.23%, 3.98%, 3.05%, and 1.28%, respectively (Table S3). This result was consistent with previous findings from healthy individuals. No significant α‐diversity was detected between the two groups (Figure 1A), but significant major separation in β‐diversity was observed between RA patients and the controls (Figure 1B). Compared to the controls, the microbiome of RA blood showed significantly higher mean distances in PCoA1 axis, but no significant difference in PCoA2 axis (Figure 1C).
FIGURE 1

Comparison of the α‐diversity and β‐diversity of the blood microbiome in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases and controls. A, We measured the α‐diversity of bacterial community in each group using three indices (eg, Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson), which considered both community richness and evenness. B, ANOSIM test (P = .001) for the within‐group and between‐group variance. C, Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) directly and completely present bacterial flora distribution between communities. PCoA plot generated based on Bray‐Curtis distances. The x‐ and y‐axes indicate the first and second coordinates, respectively, and the values in parentheses show the percentages of the community variation explained. D, The inner circle represents the classification level from phylum to genus. Each small circle at a different classification level represents a classification at that level, and the diameter of the small circle represents the relative abundance. The significantly different species are colored according to the groups. The red nodes represent the microbial groups enriched in the RA group and the green nodes represent the microbial groups enriched in the control group. The middle layer is the heatmap of the mean abundance. The darker the color, the higher it is; the outermost layer is the species annotation

Comparison of the α‐diversity and β‐diversity of the blood microbiome in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases and controls. A, We measured the α‐diversity of bacterial community in each group using three indices (eg, Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson), which considered both community richness and evenness. B, ANOSIM test (P = .001) for the within‐group and between‐group variance. C, Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) directly and completely present bacterial flora distribution between communities. PCoA plot generated based on Bray‐Curtis distances. The x‐ and y‐axes indicate the first and second coordinates, respectively, and the values in parentheses show the percentages of the community variation explained. D, The inner circle represents the classification level from phylum to genus. Each small circle at a different classification level represents a classification at that level, and the diameter of the small circle represents the relative abundance. The significantly different species are colored according to the groups. The red nodes represent the microbial groups enriched in the RA group and the green nodes represent the microbial groups enriched in the control group. The middle layer is the heatmap of the mean abundance. The darker the color, the higher it is; the outermost layer is the species annotation Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) algorithm was used to compare bacterial abundances at different taxonomic levels (five phyla, 14 classes, 37 orders, 97 families, and 196 genera) (Figure 1D). Some bacterial taxa (two phyla, three classes, six orders, 10 families, and 13 genera) have significant differences in abundance between the RA cases and controls (Table S4), for example, Bacteroidetes (0.0126 ± 0.0200 vs 0.0669 ± 0.0341, FDR q‐value = 3.51 × 10−7) and Candidatus Saccharibacteria (0.0605 ± 0.1137 vs 0.0006 ± 0.0023, FDR q‐value = 1.08 × 10−4) (Table S3). When compared our results with the findings from other studies focused on gut and synovial fluid microbiome, both consistent and inconsistent results exist. For example, the lower abundance of Bacteroidetes in the blood was consistent with that in the synovial fluid, but inconsistent with that in the gut of RA patients. Proteobacteria are one of the most abundant phyla in human microbiota. The proportion of Proteobacteria in the synovial fluid of RA patients was higher than that of controls. Our results consistently suggested that the prevalence of genera Pelagibacterium, Halomonas, Aureimonas, Chelativorans, and others that belong to the Proteobacteria phylum was higher in RA than the controls. These results taken together showed that alterations of circulating microbiome were associated with RA. In addition, the differences in microbiomes of RA patients and controls suggested some bacteria‐derived functions, including cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing (transcription and translation), and metabolism (Table S5). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) containing monocytes and lymphoid cells represent circulating mixture cells directly involved in autoimmunity and chronic inflammation. It is intuitively inferred that PBMCs and circulating microbiota live in the same environment of peripheral blood, and they can directly contact and have potential effective interactions. , Therefore, we generated the mRNA expressions and DNA methylation data in PBMCs from the same sample set by using the Human Gene Expression Microarray V.4.0 (CaptialBio, Beijing, China) and Illumina 450 K Infinium Methylation BeadChip (Illumina, Inc., USA), respectively. To detect the potential regulation roles of the identified microbial dysbiosis, we integratively analyzed the three omics data (microbiome, methylome, and transcriptome). We first performed differential expression analyses, and a total of 47 DNA methylations (|Δβ| > .05 and P < 5.0 × 10−4) and 749 mRNAs (fold change > 2, P < 5.0 × 10−4) were selected. As expected, we detected significant correlations between seven taxa within Proteobacteria phylum and DNA methylation (Table S6), and the DNA methylation site cg00959259 in PARP9 was highlighted as its consistent associations with three taxa of order Rhizobiales, family Hyphomicrobiaceae, and genus Pelagibacterium, with spearman correlation coefficients of −.6070 (P = 1.66 × 10−3), −.5539 (P = 4.98 × 10−3), and −.5626 (P = 4.21 × 10−3), respectively (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2

Associations between blood bacteria and methylation and mRNA levels of PARP9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A, Heatmap of Spearman correlations between blood bacteria and methylation and mRNA levels of PARP9 in PBMCs. Numbers in the grids are Spearman correlation coefficients (*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001). B, Scatter plots show the relationships of order Rhizobiales, family Hyphomicrobiaceae, and genus Pelagibacterium with DNA methylation of CpG site cg00959259 and PARP9 mRNA levels in PBMCs. These three taxa belong to the Proteobacteria phylum, family Hyphomicrobiaceae belongs to order Rhizobiales, and genus Pelagibacterium belongs to family Hyphomicrobiaceae

Associations between blood bacteria and methylation and mRNA levels of PARP9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A, Heatmap of Spearman correlations between blood bacteria and methylation and mRNA levels of PARP9 in PBMCs. Numbers in the grids are Spearman correlation coefficients (*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001). B, Scatter plots show the relationships of order Rhizobiales, family Hyphomicrobiaceae, and genus Pelagibacterium with DNA methylation of CpG site cg00959259 and PARP9 mRNA levels in PBMCs. These three taxa belong to the Proteobacteria phylum, family Hyphomicrobiaceae belongs to order Rhizobiales, and genus Pelagibacterium belongs to family Hyphomicrobiaceae For mRNA expression, the microbial abundances in order Rhizobiales, family Hyphomicrobiaceae, and genus Pelagibacterium were significantly associated with PARP9 mRNA level, with spearman correlation coefficients of .6040 (P = 1.77 × 10−3), .6632 (P = 4.12 × 10−4), and .6549 (P = 5.15 × 10−4), respectively (Figure 2; Table S7). Through causal inference test, we detected causal effects of order Rhizobiales, family Hyphomicrobiaceae, and genus Pelagibacterium, and the mediation effect of PARP9 mRNA expression on RA risk (Table S8). Previously, we had shown that lower cg00959259 methylation level and higher PARP9 mRNA expression level in PBMCs were associated with higher RA risk. Therefore, by combining the current results with our previously reported results, it seems that blood bacteria within the Proteobacteria phylum may increase RA risk through demethylation of PARP9, which may lead to higher expression of the PARP9 gene in PBMCs. These observations suggested that the identified microbiome alterations may have regulatory effects on gene expressions. In summary, this was the first study identifying significant alterations in blood microbiome in RA, detecting significant associations between blood bacteria and gene expressions in PBMCs, and highlighting the regulatory effects of circulating bacterial community on RA risk through the mediation of the expression of PARP9. These findings enhanced our understanding of the roles of circulating microbiome in the pathology of RA. These results suggested that the detection of imbalances in microbial composition could facilitate early diagnosis of RA, and bacterial stimuli or control could be developed as useful microbiome‐based strategies for RA prevention and treatment.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study protocol was approved by ethical committees of Soochow University. All study participants provided their written consent for participation in the study.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Xing‐Bo Mo, Chen‐Yue Dong, Pei He, Long‐Fei Wu, and Xin Lu recruited the patients and conducted the experiments. Xing‐Bo Mo, Chen‐Yue Dong, and Yong‐Hong Zhang drafted and revised the manuscript. Xing‐Bo Mo and Chen‐Yue Dong analyzed the data. Hong‐Wen Deng, Fei‐Yan Deng, and Shu‐Feng Lei designed and supervised the study, and revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity.

Authors:  J B Hughes; J J Hellmann; T H Ricketts; B J Bohannan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comprehensive description of blood microbiome from healthy donors assessed by 16S targeted metagenomic sequencing.

Authors:  Sandrine Païssé; Carine Valle; Florence Servant; Michael Courtney; Rémy Burcelin; Jacques Amar; Benjamin Lelouvier
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Blood Microbiome Profile in CKD : A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Neal B Shah; Andrew S Allegretti; Sagar U Nigwekar; Sahir Kalim; Sophia Zhao; Benjamin Lelouvier; Florence Servant; Gloria Serena; Ravi Ishwar Thadhani; Dominic S Raj; Alessio Fasano
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Influence of bacteria on epigenetic gene control.

Authors:  Kyoko Takahashi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  The dormant blood microbiome in chronic, inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Marnie Potgieter; Janette Bester; Douglas B Kell; Etheresia Pretorius
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 6.  Epigenetics: the link between nature and nurture.

Authors:  Stephanie A Tammen; Simonetta Friso; Sang-Woon Choi
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2012-08-10

7.  Rheumatoid arthritis-associated DNA methylation sites in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Authors:  Hong Zhu; Long-Fei Wu; Xing-Bo Mo; Xin Lu; Hui Tang; Xiao-Wei Zhu; Wei Xia; Yu-Fan Guo; Ming-Jun Wang; Ke-Qin Zeng; Jian Wu; Ying-Hua Qiu; Xiang Lin; Yong-Hong Zhang; Yao-Zhong Liu; Neng-Jun Yi; Fei-Yan Deng; Shu-Feng Lei
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Jacques Izard; Levi Waldron; Dirk Gevers; Larisa Miropolsky; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Characteristics of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Qian Chen; Ping Lin; Rong Xu; Dongyi He; Weiqing Ji; Yanqin Bian; Yu Shen; Qingtian Li; Chang Liu; Ke Dong; Yi-Wei Tang; Zhiheng Pei; Liying Yang; Hongzhou Lu; Xiaokui Guo; Lianbo Xiao
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Molecular characterisation of the synovial fluid microbiome in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  Dargham Bayan Mohsen Hammad; Veranja Liyanapathirana; Daniel Paul Tonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Does Oral Endotoxin Contribute to Systemic Inflammation?

Authors:  Camille Zenobia; Richard P Darveau
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Circulating Microbial Signatures and Cardiovascular Death in Patients With ESRD.

Authors:  Keiichi Sumida; Joseph F Pierre; Zhongji Han; Tahliyah S Mims; Praveen Kumar Potukuchi; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Paolo C Colombo; Ryan T Demmer; Susmita Datta; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-08-04

Review 3.  Exploring blood microbial communities and their influence on human cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ikram Khan; Imran Khan; Zhou Jianye; Zhang Xiaohua; Murad Khan; Mian Gul Hilal; Mian Adnan Kakakhel; Arshad Mehmood; An Lizhe; Li Zhiqiang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 4.  Human Blood Bacteriome: Eubiotic and Dysbiotic States in Health and Diseases.

Authors:  Kanokphong Suparan; Sirawit Sriwichaiin; Nipon Chattipakorn; Siriporn C Chattipakorn
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 7.666

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.