| Literature DB >> 31709198 |
Yang Sun1,2, Qian Chen3, Ping Lin4, Rong Xu1,2, Dongyi He1,2, Weiqing Ji1,2, Yanqin Bian1,2, Yu Shen1,2, Qingtian Li3, Chang Liu3, Ke Dong3, Yi-Wei Tang5, Zhiheng Pei6,7, Liying Yang6,7, Hongzhou Lu8, Xiaokui Guo3, Lianbo Xiao1,2.
Abstract
Little is known regarding differences in the gut microbiomes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and healthy cohorts in China. This study aimed to identify differences in the fecal microbiomes of 66 Chinese patients with RA and 60 healthy Chinese controls. The V3-V4 variable regions of bacterial 16S rRNA genes were sequenced with the Illumina system to define the bacterial composition. The alpha-diversity index of the microbiome of the RA patients was significantly lower than that of the control group. The bacterial genera Bacteroides (p = 0.02202) and Escherichia-Shigella (p = 0.03137) were more abundant in RA patients. In contrast, Lactobacillus (p = 0.000014), Alloprevotella (p = 0.0000008615), Enterobacter (p = 0.000005759), and Odoribacter (p = 0.0000166) were less abundant in the RA group than in the control group. Spearman correlation analysis of blood physiological measures of RA showed that bacterial genera such as Dorea and Ruminococcus were positively correlated with RF-IgA and anti-CCP antibodies. Furthermore, Alloprevotella and Parabacteroides were positively correlated with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and Prevotella-2 and Alloprevotella were positively correlated with C-reactive protein, both biomarkers of inflammation. These findings suggest that the gut microbiota may contribute to RA development via interactions with the host immune system.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; biomarker; gut microbiome; inflammation; rheumatoid arthritis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31709198 PMCID: PMC6819506 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Age and sex characteristics of study subjects.
| RA | Female | 21–29 | 1 |
| ( | ( | 30–39 | 8 |
| 40–49 | 9 | ||
| 50–59 | 14 | ||
| 60–69 | 16 | ||
| 70–79 | 2 | ||
| >=80 | 1 | ||
| Male | 50–59 | 6 | |
| ( | 60~69 | 9 | |
| Control | Female | 20–29 | 5 |
| ( | ( | 30–39 | 2 |
| 40–49 | 11 | ||
| 50–59 | 10 | ||
| 60–69 | 3 | ||
| Male | 20–29 | 9 | |
| ( | 30–39 | 4 | |
| 40–49 | 6 | ||
| 50–59 | 6 | ||
| >=60 | 4 |
Sociodemographic characteristics and pathological status of the RA group.
| Male | 15 (22.7%) |
| Age (years) | 54.95 ± 1.4 |
| Disease duration (years) | 32 ± 0.6 (male patients) |
| 33.8 ± 0.2 (female patients) | |
| Inflammatory markers | CR > 133 μmol/L (male patients) |
| CR > 106 μmol/L (female patients) | |
| ESR > 15 mm/h (male patients) | |
| ESR > 20 mm/h (female patients) | |
| CRP > 10 mg/L | |
| Serology | RF > 20 |
| Anti-CCP > 25 | |
| Joint involvement | 15.9 ± 14.9 (male patients) |
| 24.5 ± 17.4 (female patients) |
Values are shown as mean ± SD.
SD, standard deviation; CR, Creatinine; ESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; RF, Rheumatoid factor; CCP, Cyclic citrullinated peptide.
Figure 1Accumulation curves for the pan (A) and core (B) species analysis of the RA group (blue lines) and control group (yellow lines).
Figure 2Comparison of the α-diversities of the gut microbiomes in the RA group and control group using the Chao index (A) and Sobs index (B). Chao1 is an index that estimates the number of OTUs contained in a sample. It is commonly used in ecology to estimate the total number of species. Sobs is the observed number of OTUs. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3β-diversities of RA group and control group. (A) Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of the RA and control groups. (B) Principal component analysis (PCoA) plot generated from the weighted UniFrac analysis. The x- and y-axes indicate the first and second coordinates, respectively, and the values in parentheses show the percentages of the community variation explained. The blue and yellow symbols depict microbial enrichment in the RA group and control group, respectively. (C) Hierarchical cluster analysis results obtained using UniFrac software.
Figure 4Differences in composition of the gut microbiome between the RA group and control group. (A) Prevalence of bacterial phyla. (B) Compositions of specific bacterial genera with the highest abundances in the RA and control cohorts. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of Bacteroides 16S rRNA genes. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 5Heatmap of Spearman correlations between bacterial taxa and rheumatoid factors and anti-CCP antibodies (A) or inflammatory biomarkers (B). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.