Shuang Yang1,2, Nenghui Liu3,4, Yanping Li1,2, Lei Zhang1,2, Rongya Yue1,2. 1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. 2. Clinical Research Center For Women's Reproductive Health In Hunan Province, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. 3. Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. liunenghui@126.com. 4. Clinical Research Center For Women's Reproductive Health In Hunan Province, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. liunenghui@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with a poor ovarian response (POR) represent the most difficult group of population to deal with in the clinical fertility practice. Bologna criteria are the first uniform definition of POR. Choosing a suitable controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol which could give adequate oocytes to maximize the chance of obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst is crucial in the management for such patients. The delayed start antagonist protocol is a novel COS protocol designed for POR patients, however, its real efficacy is controversial compared to conventional protocols. The present study aims to summarize all available studies on this topic and perform a meta-analysis to explore the real treatment effect of this novel protocol in terms of reproductive outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from database establishment to June 2019 were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared delayed start antagonist protocol (Del) to conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols (Con) in terms of reproductive outcomes, were included. The RevMan 5.3 was used to perform statistical analysis. The primary outcomes were the cycle cancellation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate and the miscarriage rate. RESULTS: 5 RCTs yielding 514 patients were eligible, of which 5, 5, 4 studies were included in analyzing the cycle cancellation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate, and the miscarriage rate respectively. Synthesized data of meta-analysis showed: delayed start antagonist protocol introduced a lower risk of cycle cancellation [risk ratio (RR) = 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.45, 0.90), P = 0.01; 5 RCTs, 514 women (Del:Con = 256:258); I2 = 0%; with rates of 16.02% (Del) vs. 26.36% (Con)], an increased chance to get clinical pregnancy [RR = 2.30, 95% CI (1.38, 3.82), P = 0.001; 5 RCTs, 514 women (Del:Con = 256:258); I2 = 0%; with rates of 16.80% (Del) vs. 7.36% (Con)], and a comparable miscarriage rate [RR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.24, 1.23), P = 0.15; 4 RCTs, 58 women (Del:Con = 41:17) I2 = 17%; with rates of 19.51% (Del) vs. 35.29% (Con)] compared to conventional COS protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed start antagonist protocol was a potentially valuable alternation for poor ovarian responders. However, future RCTs with large sample size and more scientific design are needed to verify its validity and draw a sound conclusion.
BACKGROUND:Patients with a poor ovarian response (POR) represent the most difficult group of population to deal with in the clinical fertility practice. Bologna criteria are the first uniform definition of POR. Choosing a suitable controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol which could give adequate oocytes to maximize the chance of obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst is crucial in the management for such patients. The delayed start antagonist protocol is a novel COS protocol designed for POR patients, however, its real efficacy is controversial compared to conventional protocols. The present study aims to summarize all available studies on this topic and perform a meta-analysis to explore the real treatment effect of this novel protocol in terms of reproductive outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from database establishment to June 2019 were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared delayed start antagonist protocol (Del) to conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols (Con) in terms of reproductive outcomes, were included. The RevMan 5.3 was used to perform statistical analysis. The primary outcomes were the cycle cancellation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate and the miscarriage rate. RESULTS: 5 RCTs yielding 514 patients were eligible, of which 5, 5, 4 studies were included in analyzing the cycle cancellation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate, and the miscarriage rate respectively. Synthesized data of meta-analysis showed: delayed start antagonist protocol introduced a lower risk of cycle cancellation [risk ratio (RR) = 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.45, 0.90), P = 0.01; 5 RCTs, 514 women (Del:Con = 256:258); I2 = 0%; with rates of 16.02% (Del) vs. 26.36% (Con)], an increased chance to get clinical pregnancy [RR = 2.30, 95% CI (1.38, 3.82), P = 0.001; 5 RCTs, 514 women (Del:Con = 256:258); I2 = 0%; with rates of 16.80% (Del) vs. 7.36% (Con)], and a comparable miscarriage rate [RR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.24, 1.23), P = 0.15; 4 RCTs, 58 women (Del:Con = 41:17) I2 = 17%; with rates of 19.51% (Del) vs. 35.29% (Con)] compared to conventional COS protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed start antagonist protocol was a potentially valuable alternation for poor ovarian responders. However, future RCTs with large sample size and more scientific design are needed to verify its validity and draw a sound conclusion.
Authors: Carlo Alviggi; Claus Y Andersen; Klaus Buehler; Alessandro Conforti; Giuseppe De Placido; Sandro C Esteves; Robert Fischer; Daniela Galliano; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Sesh K Sunkara; Filippo M Ubaldi; Peter Humaidan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 7.329