Literature DB >> 29664789

What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF?

Alberto Vaiarelli1, Danilo Cimadomo1, Nicolò Ubaldi2, Laura Rienzi1, Filippo Maria Ubaldi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The management and treatment of patients with poor ovarian response is still a controversial issue in IVF. Increasing evidences demonstrate that the number of oocytes retrieved after a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) greatly influences the clinical outcome in terms of cumulative live birth per started cycle. For this reason, any COS should aim to optimize the number of oocytes according to the ovarian reserve of the patient. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of new strategies proposed to manage poor responders according to the novel POSEIDON classification. RECENT
FINDINGS: Gonadotrophins cannot compensate for the absence of follicles in the ovary, therefore, COS in poor responders may benefit from the exploitation of multiple follicular waves within a single ovarian cycle, for instance, through luteal phase stimulation or double stimulation (follicular plus luteal) in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) protocols.
SUMMARY: Many strategies have been proposed to manage poor responder patients, however, a consensus upon which is the most beneficial has not been yet reached. DuoStim is the most promising approach to increase the number of oocytes collected in a single ovarian cycle; however, more embryological and clinical data is required, as well as an analysis of its cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29664789     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  31 in total

1.  Double Ovarian Stimulation in the Same Ovarian Cycle.

Authors:  Corina Gica; Bogdan-Gabriel Maxim; Radu Botezatu; Gheorghe Peltecu; Anca Maria Panaitescu; Diana Iordachescu; Nicolae Gica
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2021-03

Review 2.  Efficacy of the delayed start antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in Bologna poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuang Yang; Nenghui Liu; Yanping Li; Lei Zhang; Rongya Yue
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Testosterone therapy for women with poor ovarian response undergoing IVF: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Marco Noventa; Amerigo Vitagliano; Alessandra Andrisani; Mija Blaganje; Paola Viganò; Enrico Papaelo; Marco Scioscia; Francesco Cavallin; Guido Ambrosini; Mauro Cozzolino
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general population.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Levent Donmez; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Gianluca Gennarelli; Maurizio Guido; Carlo Alviggi; Alessandro Conforti; Claudia Livi; Alberto Revelli; Silvia Colamaria; Cindy Argento; Maddalena Giuliani; Carlo De Angelis; Maria Matteo; Stefano Canosa; Angela D'Alfonso; Valentino Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Blastocyst versus cleavage transfers: who benefits?

Authors:  Enver Kerem Dirican; Safak Olgan; Mehmet Sakinci; Mete Caglar
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Effects of Adjuvant Growth Hormone Therapy on Poor Ovarian Responders in Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Simin Zafardoust; Soheila Ansaripor; Atousa Karimi; Hossein Hosseinirad; Mina Ataei
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

8.  Minimal ovarian stimulation is an alternative to conventional protocols for older women according to Poseidon's stratification: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzolino; Gustavo Nardini Cecchino; Ernesto Bosch; Juan Antonio Garcia-Velasco; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.357

9.  Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Conforti; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Raoul Orvieto; Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Fulvio Zullo; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Potential roles of experimental reproductive technologies in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Zexu Jiao; Orhan Bukulmez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.