Literature DB >> 33230742

Non-equilibrium approach for binding free energies in cyclodextrins in SAMPL7: force fields and software.

Yuriy Khalak1, Gary Tresadern2, Bert L de Groot1, Vytautas Gapsys3.   

Abstract

In the current work we report on our participation in the SAMPL7 challenge calculating absolute free energies of the host-guest systems, where 2 guest molecules were probed against 9 hosts-cyclodextrin and its derivatives. Our submission was based on the non-equilibrium free energy calculation protocol utilizing an averaged consensus result from two force fields (GAFF and CGenFF). The submitted prediction achieved accuracy of [Formula: see text] in terms of the unsigned error averaged over the whole dataset. Subsequently, we further report on the underlying reasons for discrepancies between our calculations and another submission to the SAMPL7 challenge which employed a similar methodology, but disparate ligand and water force fields. As a result we have uncovered a number of issues in the dihedral parameter definition of the GAFF 2 force field. In addition, we identified particular cases in the molecular topologies where different software packages had a different interpretation of the same force field. This latter observation might be of particular relevance for systematic comparisons of molecular simulation software packages. The aforementioned factors have an influence on the final free energy estimates and need to be considered when performing alchemical calculations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alchemy; Force field; Non-equilibrium free energy calculations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33230742      PMCID: PMC7862541          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-020-00359-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  40 in total

1.  On the use of orientational restraints and symmetry corrections in alchemical free energy calculations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Calculation of binding free energies.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Servaas Michielssens; Jan Henning Peters; Bert L de Groot; Hadas Leonov
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

3.  Hybrid MPI/OpenMP Implementation of the ORAC Molecular Dynamics Program for Generalized Ensemble and Fast Switching Alchemical Simulations.

Authors:  Piero Procacci
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Thomas Fox; Andrea Rizzi; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Nucleotide Mutations in Protein-DNA Complexes.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.

Authors:  David R Slochower; Niel M Henriksen; Lee-Ping Wang; John D Chodera; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Complexation of adamantyl compounds by beta-cyclodextrin and monoaminoderivatives.

Authors:  Jorge Carrazana; Aida Jover; Francisco Meijide; Victor H Soto; José Vazquez Tato
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Lessons learned from comparing molecular dynamics engines on the SAMPL5 dataset.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Christoph Klein; Jason M Swails; Jian Yin; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley; David A Case; Ellen D Zhong
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  pmx: Automated protein structure and topology generation for alchemical perturbations.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Servaas Michielssens; Daniel Seeliger; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Accurate Estimation of Ligand Binding Affinity Changes upon Protein Mutation.

Authors:  Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 14.553

View more
  6 in total

1.  An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Jeffry Setiadi; Yunhui Ge; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.179

2.  Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Hannah M Baumann; Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.

Authors:  AkshatKumar Nigam; Robert Pollice; Matthew F D Hurley; Riley J Hickman; Matteo Aldeghi; Naruki Yoshikawa; Seyone Chithrananda; Vincent A Voelz; Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 7.050

4.  SAMPL7 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.

Authors:  Piero Procacci; Guido Guarnieri
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Léa El Khoury; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Evaluation of log P, pKa, and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge.

Authors:  Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Nicolas Tielker; Yingying Zhang; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner; Karol Francisco; Carlo Ballatore; Stefan M Kast; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.