Rudy Rubini1, Clemens Mayer1. 1. Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Biocontainment is an essential feature when deploying genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in open system applications, as variants escaping their intended operating environments could negatively impact ecosystems and human health. To avoid breaches resulting from metabolic cross-feeding, horizontal gene transfer, and/or genetic mutations, synthetic auxotrophs have been engineered to become dependent on exogenously supplied xenobiotics, such as noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs). The incorporation of these abiological building blocks into essential proteins constitutes a first step toward constructing xenobiological barriers between GMOs and their environments. To transition synthetic auxotrophs further away from familiar biology, we demonstrate how bacterial growth can be confined by transition-metal complexes that catalyze the formation of an essential ncAA through new-to-nature reactions. Specifically, using a homogeneous ruthenium complex enabled us to localize bacterial growth on solid media, while heterogeneous palladium nanoparticles could be recycled and deployed up to five consecutive times to ensure the survival of synthetic auxotrophs in liquid cultures.
Biocontainment is an essential feature when deploying genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in open system applications, as variants escaping their intended operating environments could negatively impact ecosystems and human health. To avoid breaches resulting from metabolic cross-feeding, horizontal gene transfer, and/or genetic mutations, synthetic auxotrophs have been engineered to become dependent on exogenously supplied xenobiotics, such as noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs). The incorporation of these abiological building blocks into essential proteins constitutes a first step toward constructing xenobiological barriers between GMOs and their environments. To transition synthetic auxotrophs further away from familiar biology, we demonstrate how bacterial growth can be confined by transition-metal complexes that catalyze the formation of an essential ncAA through new-to-nature reactions. Specifically, using a homogeneous ruthenium complex enabled us to localize bacterial growth on solid media, while heterogeneous palladium nanoparticles could be recycled and deployed up to five consecutive times to ensure the survival of synthetic auxotrophs in liquid cultures.
Synthetic biology aims to take
advantage of designer organisms for diverse applications including
the sustainable synthesis of fine and bulk chemicals, the cleanup
of environmental pollutants, or their use in biomedicine.[1−5] However, deploying genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in such
real-world applications bears the risk that variants escaping their
intended operating environments could harm both ecosystems and human
health.[6,7] As a result, any GMO with the potential
of being (deliberately or unintentionally) released into the environment
must feature effective biocontainment safeguards that restrict its
proliferation in space and time (= trophic containment).[8−10]Exploiting the inability of an organism to synthesize a compound
that is essential for growth (= auxotrophy) is a
straightforward means to achieve biocontainment. For example, rendering
essential genes in key metabolic pathways inoperative results in addicted
organisms, whose survival becomes strictly dependent on the exogenous
supply of this metabolite (Figure A, metabolic auxotrophy).[11,12] In practice though, this type of biocontainment is often ineffective,
as auxotrophic organisms can either regain functional genes via horizontal
gene transfer and/or obtain the essential metabolite by metabolic
cross-feeding (e.g., the lysine contingency in Jurassic Park). To avoid the possibility of genetic and metabolic cross-talk (= semantic containment), an amended version of this approach
has recently been introduced, in which survival is made dependent
on compounds that are not naturally occurring (= xenobiotics).[13−15]
Figure 1
Employing auxotrophy in (synthetic) biocontainment strategies.
(A) In metabolic auxotrophy, an essential metabolite is provided to
an organism that lacks the ability for its biosynthesis. (B) Synthetic
auxotrophy strategies take advantage of recoded organisms that have
been made dependent on the supply of xenobiotics, such as ncAAs or
unnatural nucleobases. (C) Schematic representation of genetic code
expansion by amber stop-codon suppression: an ncAA is charged onto
an orthogonal suppressor tRNA through the action of an engineered
aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase (aaRS). Once charged, the acylated tRNA
is recruited to the ribosome, where it suppresses an in-frame stop
codon located on an mRNA, resulting in the site-selective incorporation
of the ncAA into a protein of interest. (D) Synthetic biocontainment
strategies lend themselves to further xenobiological sophistication.
For example, we employ biocompatible catalysts that are able to convert
appropriate precursors into essential xenobiotics to addict bacteria
to new-to-nature reactions.
Employing auxotrophy in (synthetic) biocontainment strategies.
(A) In metabolic auxotrophy, an essential metabolite is provided to
an organism that lacks the ability for its biosynthesis. (B) Synthetic
auxotrophy strategies take advantage of recoded organisms that have
been made dependent on the supply of xenobiotics, such as ncAAs or
unnatural nucleobases. (C) Schematic representation of genetic code
expansion by amber stop-codon suppression: an ncAA is charged onto
an orthogonal suppressor tRNA through the action of an engineered
aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase (aaRS). Once charged, the acylated tRNA
is recruited to the ribosome, where it suppresses an in-frame stop
codon located on an mRNA, resulting in the site-selective incorporation
of the ncAA into a protein of interest. (D) Synthetic biocontainment
strategies lend themselves to further xenobiological sophistication.
For example, we employ biocompatible catalysts that are able to convert
appropriate precursors into essential xenobiotics to addict bacteria
to new-to-nature reactions.Both noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) and unnatural nucleobases
have been successfully employed for restricting bacterial growth to
artificial environments in which these xenobiotics are supplied (=
synthetic auxotrophy, Figure B).[16−20] For example, the suppression of in-frame stop codons by orthogonal
translation systems (OTS, Figure C) enables the site-specific incorporation of ncAAs
into essential proteins.[21,22] In the absence of the
non-natural building block, premature termination of translation is
triggered, resulting in a truncated and inactive protein fragment.
As a result, this functional connection renders ncAAs essential metabolites
and also can prevent metabolic cross-feeding, if the ncAA is not readily
available in natural habitats. Moreover, this strategy also provides
a path toward halting genetic cross-talk between designer microbes
and organisms in the environment, since the genetic code used by the
former cannot be readily understood by the latter.[9,12] An
extension of this strategy is the creation of designer organisms that
have undergone full-genome recoding and make use of an unambiguous,
alternative genetic code.[23]In addition
to providing a proof-of-concept for synthetic biocontainment
strategies, these studies also facilitate further xenobiological sophistications
that could transition containment strategies away from familiar biology.[10,15] Following such a the-farther-the-safer philosophy,
we demonstrate how the in situ synthesis of ncAAs
by biocompatible transition-metal catalysts can make bacterial survival
dependent on new-to-nature reactions (Figure D).Besides adding additional safeguards
against GMO escape, we show
that homogeneous catalysts can be used to localize bacterial growth
on solid media as sufficiently high concentrations of ncAAs are only
provided in the catalyst’s proximity. Last, we also demonstrate
that heterogeneous catalysts can be recovered after their initial
deployment and reused over multiple cycles, thus rendering them recyclable
biocontainment devices.In order to establish a functional link
between the survival of Escherichia coli and the
supply of ncAAs, we took advantage
of a recently developed β-lactamase variant (TEM-1.B9) whose
activity to degrade ampicillin is strictly dependent on the incorporation
of 3-iodo-l-tyrosine (3iY) or 3-nitro-l-tyrosine
(3nY, Figure A).[16] Genes encoding for TEM-1.B9 and an OTS selective
for these ncAAs were placed on a single plasmid, pAddict (see Supporting Information for details). By continuously
expressing all components under a constitutive promoter, the growth
of pAddict-harboring E. coli in the presence of ampicillin
should strictly depend on the exogenous supply of 3iY/3nY.
Figure 2
Establishing
a functional link between E. coli survival and the
supply of ncAAs. (A) The plasmid pAddict contains
an OTS selective for 3iY/3nY and a β-lactamase variant that
only functions when either of these ncAAs is incorporated. As a result,
survival of pAddict-harboring E. coli in the presence
of ampicillin is dependent on the exogenous supply of 3iY or 3nY.
(B) From left to right: pAddict-harboring E. coli cannot proliferate in the presence of ampicillin (5 μg mL–1) but grow when 3nY or 3iY (500 μM) are supplied
or in absence of ampicillin. Images were taken after incubating plates
at 30 °C for 48 h (see Figure S1 for
additional time points and higher ampicillin concentrations). (C)
Schematic representation of cell densities measured after 30 h across
ampicillin and ncAA gradients. Average OD600 values obtained
from two biological replicates are represented in blue shades matching
the legend provided on the left. Values obtained for individual experiments
as well as a time course of the addiction experiment can be found
in Figure S2 and Videos S1 and S2.
Establishing
a functional link between E. coli survival and the
supply of ncAAs. (A) The plasmid pAddict contains
an OTS selective for 3iY/3nY and a β-lactamase variant that
only functions when either of these ncAAs is incorporated. As a result,
survival of pAddict-harboring E. coli in the presence
of ampicillin is dependent on the exogenous supply of 3iY or 3nY.
(B) From left to right: pAddict-harboring E. coli cannot proliferate in the presence of ampicillin (5 μg mL–1) but grow when 3nY or 3iY (500 μM) are supplied
or in absence of ampicillin. Images were taken after incubating plates
at 30 °C for 48 h (see Figure S1 for
additional time points and higher ampicillin concentrations). (C)
Schematic representation of cell densities measured after 30 h across
ampicillin and ncAA gradients. Average OD600 values obtained
from two biological replicates are represented in blue shades matching
the legend provided on the left. Values obtained for individual experiments
as well as a time course of the addiction experiment can be found
in Figure S2 and Videos S1 and S2.To verify addiction to either of these ncAAs, bacterial survival
was first evaluated on permissive and nonpermissive solid media by
monitoring colony-forming units (c.f.u.) over time. As anticipated,
when spreading ∼500 bacterial cells on LB agar containing ampicillin
(5–50 μg mL–1), colonies were only
observed when 3nY or 3iY was supplied (500 μM, Figure B and Supporting Figure S1). Similarly, when following cell density (OD600) over 30 h at 30 °C in liquid cultures, increasing
ncAA concentrations enabled bacterial growth at higher antibiotic
concentrations (Figure C, Supporting Videos S1 and S2 and Figure S2).
Consistent with a strict ncAA-dependency, in the absence of either
3nY or 3iY, pAddict-harboring E. coli could not proliferate
in a nonpermissive solid or liquid media (Figure B,C). As 3nY consistently outperformed 3iY
and enabled growth at higher ampicillin concentrations (Figures S1, S2), we selected the former for all
further experiments.The ability to alter cellular environments
by promoting transformations
in the presence of live cells makes biocompatible catalysts a promising
tool for the envisioned xenobiological sophistications of synthetic
biocontainment strategies.[24−26] For example, transition-metal
catalysts have previously been employed for promoting abiological
transformations in the presence of or inside cells and allowed for
replacing inoperative enzymes in metabolic auxotrophs.[27,28] To confine bacterial growth by employing ncAAs and new-to-nature
transformations, we selected the transition-metal-catalyzed deprotection
of allyloxycarbonyl-(alloc)-protected amines as a model new-to-nature
transformation and prepared alloc-3nY as a suitable ncAA precursor
(Figure A). From the
biocompatible catalysts known to promote the target reaction and function
in presence of or inside cells, we made use of a ruthenium-based complex, Ru1 (Figure B), as this catalyst is able to perform up to 60 turnovers in the
presence of E. coli, while not being deactivated
and displaying minimal toxicity.[29,30]
Figure 3
Rescuing synthetic
auxotrophs with a homogeneous transition-metal
catalyst. (A, B) The deprotection of alloc-3nY is promoted by the
biocompatible ruthenium catalyst, Ru1. (C) Proliferation
of pAddict-harboring E. coli in the presence of ampicillin
is strictly dependent on Ru1, when alloc-3nY is provided.
(D) Schematic representation of cell densities measured after 30 h
across ampicillin and Ru1 gradients in the presence of
500 μM alloc-3nY. Average OD600 values obtained from
two biological replicatesare represented in blue shades matching the
legend provided in Figure C. Values obtained for individual experiments as well as a
time course can be found in Figure S3 and Video S3. (E) Growth of pAddict-harboring E. coli is localized around the area Ru1 was
provided in the presence of ampicillin (10 μg mL–1) and alloc-3nY (500 μM). (F, G) Without the addition of the
catalyst, no growth is observed, while in the absence of ampicillin,
colonies appear evenly distributed on the plate. (H) Directly supplying
3nY also confines growth in the presence of ampicillin, but high local
concentrations near the center proved toxic as indicated by the halo
distribution (see also Figure S4).
Rescuing synthetic
auxotrophs with a homogeneous transition-metal
catalyst. (A, B) The deprotection of alloc-3nY is promoted by the
biocompatible ruthenium catalyst, Ru1. (C) Proliferation
of pAddict-harboring E. coli in the presence of ampicillin
is strictly dependent on Ru1, when alloc-3nY is provided.
(D) Schematic representation of cell densities measured after 30 h
across ampicillin and Ru1 gradients in the presence of
500 μM alloc-3nY. Average OD600 values obtained from
two biological replicatesare represented in blue shades matching the
legend provided in Figure C. Values obtained for individual experiments as well as a
time course can be found in Figure S3 and Video S3. (E) Growth of pAddict-harboring E. coli is localized around the area Ru1 was
provided in the presence of ampicillin (10 μg mL–1) and alloc-3nY (500 μM). (F, G) Without the addition of the
catalyst, no growth is observed, while in the absence of ampicillin,
colonies appear evenly distributed on the plate. (H) Directly supplying
3nY also confines growth in the presence of ampicillin, but high local
concentrations near the center proved toxic as indicated by the halo
distribution (see also Figure S4).To evaluate the ability of Ru1 to
rescue bacterial
growth when alloc-3nY was provided (Figure C), OD600 values were monitored
for 30 h in 96-well plates across Ru1 and ampicillin
gradients in the presence of a fixed concentration of alloc-3nY (500
μM, Figure D, Supporting Video S3 and Figure S3). While alloc-3nY proved metabolically stable and did not
promote bacterial growth under nonpermissive conditions (≥5
μg mL–1 ampicillin), Ru1 was
indeed able to rescue 3nY-addicted bacteria (Figure D). Specifically, increasing Ru1 concentrations promoted growth under more stringent conditions,
and for catalyst loadings > 2.5%, cell proliferation was comparable
to directly supplementing 500 μM 3nY in the absence of the catalyst.
Notably though, the combination of Ru1 and alloc-3nY
resulted in growth under more stringent conditions, when compared
to adding Ru1 to 3nY (Figure D). We ascribe this result to both the catalyst
and the ncAA displaying some toxicity (vide infra), while the alloc- precursor does not. As such, in the presence
of Ru1, the continuous production of 3nY by the catalyst
over an extended time period is advantageous when compared to the
direct supplementation of the ncAA itself.With Ru1 being able to rescue synthetic auxotrophs
in liquid media, we next explored whether the catalyst’s ability
to continuously generate 3nY in its proximity could also allow us
to confine bacterial growth on solid media. Toward this end, we first
spread ∼500 addicted E. coli cells on the
surface of permissive and nonpermissive LB agar plates containing
alloc-3nY (500 μM). Next, we added 10 μL of a 2 mM Ru1 stock solution on top of the solidified agar and monitored
colony formation over a period of 72 h at 30 °C (Figures E–G). Consistent with
a limited diffusion of Ru1 and the continuous production
of 3nY in its proximity, colonies of addicted E.coli were only observed near the center of the plate after
48–72 h (Figure E, Figure S4). Conversely, in the absence
of ampicillin, colonies appeared evenly distributed on the plate,
while alloc-3nY by itself was not able to rescue the synthetic auxotrophs
(Figure F,G). Notably,
in an effort to mimic the localization observed for Ru1 by adding 3nY onto agar plates (10 μL from a 20-mM stock solution),
we observed a distinct halo pattern at the location at which 3nY was
provided (Figure H
and Figure S4). This marked difference
with respect to supplying Ru1 is consistent with the
previously observed toxicity of this ncAA at high concentrations.[31] Thus, these results highlight the advantage
of producing 3nY over time by a biocompatible catalyst, which does
not show any apparent toxicity when applied onto agar plates containing
live E. coli.To further localize growth and
allow for the redeployment of a
catalyst after its initial use, we prepared heterogeneous palladium
nanoparticles entrapped in polystyrene beads (PdNPs).[32,33] Such PdNPs have previously been used for the uncaging of propargyl-(proc)-protected
amines (Figures A) in vivo, and accordingly, we synthesized proc-p-chloro-d/l-phenylalanine (proc-p-ClF) and
proc-3nY as suitable ncAA precursors. We used the deprotection of
proc-p-ClF and the subsequent incorporation of p-ClF into a GFP variant featuring a UAG stop-codon at position
Y151 to assess the activity of freshly prepared PdNPs in the presence
of live E. coli. As we have shown previously,[29] monitoring GFP fluorescence over time in 96-well
plates provides information on both the toxicity of the heterogeneous
catalyst and its ability to promote the desired transformation. Adding
PdNPs at a concentration > 5 mg mL–1 indeed resulted
in robust fluorescence levels when proc-p-ClF was
provided as substrate and the comparison to appropriate controls further
indicated that the nanoparticles do not display any appreciable toxicity
at these concentrations (Figure S5).
Figure 4
Rescuing synthetic auxotrophs with heterogeneous palladium
nanoparticles.
(A) The uncaging of proc-protected ncAAs is promoted by biocompatible
palladium nanoparticles entrapped in polystyrene beads (PdNPs). (B)
Bar graph depicting cell density (OD600, blue) and 3nY
yields determined by HPLC (red) for different PdNP concentrations
in the presence of 500 μM proc-3nY. Data points and error bars
are the average values and standard deviations of at least two biological
replicates. (C) Schematic representation of workflow to recycle PdNPs
for multiple deployments. (D) Comparison of OD600 measured
after 23 h (in blue) and 3nY yields determined by HPLC quantification
(in red) for consecutive deployments of PdNPs in the presence of 500
μM proc-3nY. Data points over five deployments (first through
fifth) for two different PdNP preparations (#1 and #2) are displayed.
Rescuing synthetic auxotrophs with heterogeneous palladium
nanoparticles.
(A) The uncaging of proc-protected ncAAs is promoted by biocompatible
palladium nanoparticles entrapped in polystyrene beads (PdNPs). (B)
Bar graph depicting cell density (OD600, blue) and 3nY
yields determined by HPLC (red) for different PdNP concentrations
in the presence of 500 μM proc-3nY. Data points and error bars
are the average values and standard deviations of at least two biological
replicates. (C) Schematic representation of workflow to recycle PdNPs
for multiple deployments. (D) Comparison of OD600 measured
after 23 h (in blue) and 3nY yields determined by HPLC quantification
(in red) for consecutive deployments of PdNPs in the presence of 500
μM proc-3nY. Data points over five deployments (first through
fifth) for two different PdNP preparations (#1 and #2) are displayed.Next, we performed analogous deprotections of proc-3nY
to evaluate
the ability of PdNPs to rescue pAddict-harboring E. coli cells. Unfortunately, our attempts to further localize growth on
solid media proved unfruitful. When placing around 100 polystyrene
beads featuring entrapped PdNPs on top of an agar plate on which about
500 cells were spread, we did not observe the formation of colonies
after extended incubation times (>5 days, Figure
S6), a result we attribute to the problem of overcoming the
solid–solid phase separation between catalyst and substrate.Conversely, when adding PdNPs (5 or 10 mg mL–1) to 5 mL liquid cultures containing proc-3nY (500 μM), ampicillin
(15 μg mL–1), and addicted E. coli, we observed significant cell growth over a period of 24 h (Figure B and Figure S7). While OD600 values for
PdNPs were significantly lower than those obtained for cultures that
were supplemented directly with 3nY, the proc-protected precursor
was not able to support cell growth. To further pinpoint that bacterial
growth is the result of the conversion of proc-3nY by the heterogeneous
catalyst, we quantified 3nY concentrations after 24 h by reverse-phase
HPLC (Figure B). Indeed,
ncAA concentrations obtained correlated with PdNP concentrations and
the observed cell densities.Last, we envisioned that the use
of a heterogeneous catalyst could
allow us to reuse PdNPs after their initial deployment (Figure C). Specifically, following
an initial 23-h period of employment, polystyrene beads were separated
from cells and extensively washed before new media containing proc-3nY
(500 μM), ampicillin (15 μg mL–1) and
pAddict-harboring E. coli cells was added. After
each cycle, we quantified cell growth, determined 3nY concentrations
by HPLC, and verified that growing cells remained addicted to 3nY
(Figure D and Figure S8). Indeed, redeployment of PdNPs was
possible, and we observed cell growth and 3nY production for five
consecutive deployments. Consistent with the deactivation of PdNPs
over time, OD600 values and 3nY yields decreased significantly
after the third recycling step. Nevertheless, the ability to reuse
PdNPs for multiple deployments provides a proof-of-concept for employing
heterogeneous catalysts that promote new-to-nature transformations
as recyclable biocontainment devices.Here, we demonstrate how
biocompatible transition metal catalysts
with abiological reactivities can add safeguards and new features
to synthetic biocontainment strategies. Specifically, we demonstrate
that both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts are able to rescue
synthetic auxotrophs by performing new-to-nature reactions that provide
an essential ncAA. Directly deploying a homogeneous, ruthenium-based
catalyst on solid media enables spatial control over the growth of E. coli that feature a single plasmid that ensured addiction
to an ncAA. When using heterogeneous PdNPs for rescuing these synthetic
auxotrophs in liquid media, the catalyst could be successfully deployed
up to five consecutive times to ensure bacterial survival.With
respect to their potential application to biocontainment,
the combination of recoded organisms and biocompatible small-molecule
catalysts has some notable advantages. While relying on an expanded
genetic code makes the dispersal of genes to wild-type organisms more
difficult, the use of small-molecule catalysts that are not genetically
encoded prevents such a spread entirely. Moreover, by relying on reactivities
unknown to nature, biocompatible catalysts represent a form of xenobiological
sophistication that further increase the barrier between wild-type
and designer organisms.[10,15] We anticipate this
gap to widen once other catalyst/transformation combinations are evaluated
for their ability to rescue synthetic auxotrophs dependent on ncAAs
and unnatural nucleotides as well as designer organisms that have
undergone full-genome recoding.[16−20,23] The resulting modularity should
allow for flexibility and customization, which are attractive features
when considering the variety of environments to which GMOs could potentially
be applied.In addition to biocontainment, generating functional
links between
man-made catalysts with new-to-nature activities and the survival
of E. coli could also find applications in other
areas of synthetic biology, such as creating enzymes with abiological
activities.[34−36] Specifically, as bacterial growth is restricted by
the rate a catalyst can provide a ncAA, the recruitment of biocompatible
catalysts by promiscuous or designed proteins within E. coli could boost the catalytic performance of these essential, abiological
cofactors. Under selective conditions, bacteria harboring such enzyme
variants will have a competitive advantage over those featuring inactive
variants. As ampicillin (or carbenicillin) concentrations provide
a tunable selection pressure, the directed or long-term evolution
of such artificial metalloenzymes in vivo is therefore
within reach.
Authors: Drew S Tack; Jared W Ellefson; Ross Thyer; Bo Wang; Jimmy Gollihar; Matthew T Forster; Andrew D Ellington Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 15.040