Megan E Grund1, Soo J Choi1, Dudley H McNitt1, Mariette Barbier1, Gangqing Hu1,2,3, P Rocco LaSala4, Christopher K Cote5, Rita Berisio6, Slawomir Lukomski1,2. 1. Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States of America. 2. Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States of America. 3. Bioinformatics Core, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States of America. 4. Department of Pathology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States of America. 5. Bacteriology Division, The United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, MD, United States of America. 6. Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
Bacterial efflux pumps are an important pathogenicity trait because they extrude a variety of xenobiotics. Our laboratory previously identified in silico Burkholderia collagen-like protein 8 (Bucl8) in the hazardous pathogens Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. We hypothesize that Bucl8, which contains two predicted tandem outer membrane efflux pump domains, is a component of a putative efflux pump. Unique to Bucl8, as compared to other outer membrane proteins, is the presence of an extended extracellular region containing a collagen-like (CL) domain and a non-collagenous C-terminus (Ct). Molecular modeling and circular dichroism spectroscopy with a recombinant protein, corresponding to this extracellular CL-Ct portion of Bucl8, demonstrated that it adopts a collagen triple helix, whereas functional assays screening for Bucl8 ligands identified binding to fibrinogen. Bioinformatic analysis of the bucl8 gene locus revealed it resembles a classical efflux-pump operon. The bucl8 gene is co-localized with downstream fusCDE genes encoding fusaric acid (FA) resistance, and with an upstream gene, designated as fusR, encoding a LysR-type transcriptional regulator. Using reverse transcriptase (RT)-qPCR, we defined the boundaries and transcriptional organization of the fusR-bucl8-fusCDE operon. We found exogenous FA induced bucl8 transcription over 80-fold in B. pseudomallei, while deletion of the entire bucl8 locus decreased the minimum inhibitory concentration of FA 4-fold in its isogenic mutant. We furthermore showed that the putative Bucl8-associated pump expressed in the heterologous Escherichia coli host confers FA resistance. On the contrary, the Bucl8-associated pump did not confer resistance to a panel of clinically-relevant antimicrobials in Burkholderia and E. coli. We finally demonstrated that deletion of the bucl8-locus drastically affects the growth of the mutant in L-broth. We determined that Bucl8 is a component of a novel tetrapartite efflux pump, which confers FA resistance, fibrinogen binding, and optimal growth.
Bacterial efflux pumps are an important pathogenicity trait because they extrude a variety of xenobiotics. Our laboratory previously identified in silico Burkholderia collagen-like protein 8 (Bucl8) in the hazardous pathogens Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. We hypothesize that Bucl8, which contains two predicted tandem outer membrane efflux pump domains, is a component of a putative efflux pump. Unique to Bucl8, as compared to other outer membrane proteins, is the presence of an extended extracellular region containing a collagen-like (CL) domain and a non-collagenous C-terminus (Ct). Molecular modeling and circular dichroism spectroscopy with a recombinant protein, corresponding to this extracellular CL-Ct portion of Bucl8, demonstrated that it adopts a collagen triple helix, whereas functional assays screening for Bucl8 ligands identified binding to fibrinogen. Bioinformatic analysis of the bucl8 gene locus revealed it resembles a classical efflux-pump operon. The bucl8 gene is co-localized with downstream fusCDE genes encoding fusaric acid (FA) resistance, and with an upstream gene, designated as fusR, encoding a LysR-type transcriptional regulator. Using reverse transcriptase (RT)-qPCR, we defined the boundaries and transcriptional organization of the fusR-bucl8-fusCDE operon. We found exogenous FA induced bucl8 transcription over 80-fold in B. pseudomallei, while deletion of the entire bucl8 locus decreased the minimum inhibitory concentration of FA 4-fold in its isogenic mutant. We furthermore showed that the putative Bucl8-associated pump expressed in the heterologous Escherichia coli host confers FA resistance. On the contrary, the Bucl8-associated pump did not confer resistance to a panel of clinically-relevant antimicrobials in Burkholderia and E. coli. We finally demonstrated that deletion of the bucl8-locus drastically affects the growth of the mutant in L-broth. We determined that Bucl8 is a component of a novel tetrapartite efflux pump, which confers FA resistance, fibrinogen binding, and optimal growth.
Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei
are Gram-negative bacteria that are the etiological agents of melioidosis and
glanders, respectively [1].
Both pathogens are highly virulent and easily aerosolized, therefore they are
classified as Tier one select agents by both the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. In addition to being a biodefense
concern, the bacteria are highly resistant to antibiotics and currently there is no
licensed vaccine for either pathogen. Increasing global investigation into
melioidosis has indicated that the disease may be more widespread than originally
reported [2], and it has one
of the highest disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of neglected tropical diseases
at 4.6 million [3].B. pseudomallei is a soil saprophyte that can
infect humans, resulting in symptoms ranging from localized infections, including
swelling or ulcerations, to systemic infections that can lead to septic shock [4]. Treatment includes an
extensive two-part chemotherapeutic regimen, most commonly using ceftazidime
intravenously and then following it with an oral antibiotic eradication therapy of
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole [5, 6].
B. mallei is a clonal derivative of
B. pseudomallei that has undergone significant
genomic reduction and rearrangement. This genomic evolution is attributed to the
species transition from being a soil saprophyte to an obligate host pathogen,
selecting for genes advantageous for host-survival [7]. Glanders primarily affects equines, but can
infect other livestock such as donkeys and goats. Although uncommon in humans, this
zoonotic disease is often fatal if left untreated [4]. Symptoms typically affect the pulmonary
system, including pneumonia and lung abscess, but may also present as cutaneous
ulceration following direct inoculation.Several classes of efflux pumps are expressed in multidrug resistant Gram-negative
bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter
baumannii, and Burkholderia spp., and are at least
partly responsible for their intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, including
resistance-nodulation division (RND) efflux pumps [8]. Burkholderia are notorious
for being resistant to an array of antibiotics, such as β-lactams, aminoglycosides,
tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, polymyxins, and trimethoprim [9], resulting in serious
infections that are hard to treat [10]. Bioinformatic analyses of the B.
pseudomallei genomes have identified at least ten RND efflux
pumps [11], although only
three systems were characterized in more detail,
e.g., AmrAB-OprA, BpeAB-OprB, and BpeEF-OprC
[12]; this gap in
knowledge underscores a need for more studies of drug efflux pumps in
Burkholderia [13]. Importantly, a large body of evidence indicates that efflux pumps
also contribute to resistance to a variety of host-defense molecules, biofilm
formation, regulation of quorum sensing and balanced metabolism, and overall
pathogenesis [14], which
further accentuate the importance of the efflux systems in bacteria.Our previous studies have identified 13 novel Burkholderia
collagen-like (CL) proteins (Bucl) containing collagen-like Gly-Xaa-Yaa (GXY)
repeats, as well as non-collagen domains, some of which had predicted functions:
Talin-1 cytoskeletal integrin-binding domain, Bac_export_1 domain found in
inner-membrane protein components of a type III secretion system, or Bac_export_3
domain of solute-binding proteins often associated with ABC-type transporters [15]. Specifically, Bucl8 was
predicted to be an outer membrane protein, containing tandem efflux pump OEP1 and
OEP2 (outer membrane efflux protein; PF02321) domains. Unique to Bucl8, as compared
to typical outer membrane proteins with OEP domains, is the presence of an extended
extracellular portion of unknown function that contains a presumed collagen-like
(CL) domain, followed by a non-collagen C-terminal (Ct) region. This Bucl8 variant
was present only in B. pseudomallei and
B. mallei. In addition, the collagen domain,
which is broadly characterized as a stretch of repeating GXY motifs [16], in Bucl8 is composed of an
uncommon repeating (Gly-Ala-Ser or GAS)n collagen-like sequence.Here, our objectives are to characterize the structure and function of the Bucl8
extracellular domain, define the bucl8 locus, and identify
substrates and potential function(s) of the putative Bucl8-associated efflux pump.
We demonstrate that the collagen-like domain indeed adopts the characteristic
collagen triple-helical structure. In addition, the recombinant extracellular
portion of Bucl8 can bind to fibrinogen. We find that Bucl8 is the outer membrane
component of an efflux pump responsible for fusaric acid (FA) resistance, a potent
mycotoxin produced by Fusarium species that cohabitate the soil
environment with Burkholderia [17, 18]. We further identify
bucl8-associated genes, designated fusCDE,
encoding the remaining components of the putative Bucl8-efflux pump. Transcripts of
the bucl8-operon were upregulated in B.
pseudomallei and B. mallei by
exogenous FA, as well as by FA-derivative p-hydroxybenzoic acid
(pHBA), which is involved in regulation of balanced metabolism in
E. coli. FA resistance was diminished in a
B. pseudomallei isogenic deletion mutant
without the bucl8 locus and could also be transferred to a
FA-sensitive E. coli strain. Lastly, we found that
the mutant grew at a significantly reduced rate, suggesting that under laboratory
conditions the pump is important for the cell’s physiology. Here, we describe a
previously unreported putative efflux pump with unique structure and functional
implications in the biology of B. pseudomallei and
B. mallei species.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and growth
Two BSL2 Burkholderia strains exempt from the Select Agents list
were used in this study: (i) B. pseudomallei
strain Bp82 is an avirulent ΔpurM mutant of strain 1026b [19], which was obtained
from Christopher Cote (US AMRIID, Frederick, MD) and (ii) B.
mallei CLH001 ΔtonBΔhcp1
mutant originates from the strain Bm ATCC23344 [20], which was obtained from Alfredo Torres
(UTMB, Galveston, TX) (Table
1). Strain Bp82 was routinely grown in Luria broth-Miller (LBM) with
shaking at 37°C and on Luria agar (LA) solid medium at 37°C. Strain CLH001 was
grown under the same conditions, but the broth medium was supplemented with 4%
glycerol. E. coli strains JM109 (Promega) and
S17-1λpir/pLFX (E. coli Genetic Stock Center,
Yale University) were cultured in LBM media and on LA. Antimicrobials were used
in selective media and in susceptibility/ resistance assays, as described in the
methods below.
Table 1
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Strains and Plasmids
Description/ Characteristics
Source
B.
pseudomallei
Bp 1026b (genomic DNA)
Blood culture from 29-year-old female rice
farmer with diabetes mellitus, Northeast Thailand,
Sappasithiprasong hospital; 1993
Attenuated 1026b strain with a partial deletion
of the purM gene resulting in adenine and
thiamine auxotrophy
USAMRIID, Frederick, MD
Bp82Δbucl8-fusE
Bucl8-associated pump deletion mutant
This study
B.
mallei
CLH001
Attenuated Bm ATCC23344 mutant with genes
tonB (iron acquisition) and
hcp1 (type 6 secretory system
structural protein) deleted
UTMB, Galveston, TX
E.coli
JM109
Host strain; ΔendA1,
ΔrecA1, ΔlacZ
gene
Promega
JM109::525
JM109 with pSL525 plasmid containing the
Bucl8-pump locus from Bp 1026b/Bp82
This study
JM109::529
JM109 with pSL529 plasmid containing the
Bucl8-pump locus from Bp K96243
This study
S17-1λpir/pLFX
Mobilization host
E. coli
Genetic Stock Center, Yale University
Plasmids
pQE-30
E. coli
expression vector for proteins with N-terminal 6xHis-tag; T5
promoter; ampicillin resistance
Qiagen
pUC18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp
Mobilizable TpR mini-Tn7 vector; trimethoprim
and ampicillin resistance
[21]
pMo130
Mobilizable E.
coli vector that is suicide in
Burkholderia
[22]
pSL520
pQE-30-based plasmid for expression of
rBucl8-Ct protein
This study
pSL521
pQE-30-based plasmid for expression of
rBucl8-CL-Ct protein
This study
pSL522
pMo130-based plasmid with fusR
for generating chromosomal deletion of Bucl8-pump.
This study
pSL524
pMo130-based plasmid with fusR
and tar for generating chromosomal deletion
of Bucl8-pump
This study
pSL525
pUC18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp based plasmid with
Bucl8-pump locus of Bp 1026b/Bp82
This study
pSL529
pUC18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp based plasmid with
Bucl8-pump locus of Bp K96243
This study
Bioinformatic analyses of the bucl8 locus
Annotation of transcriptional and translational signals
The promoter regions of fusR and bucl8 were
defined by combining public transcriptome data and computational prediction.
Briefly, strand-specific RNA-Seq data of B.
pseudomallei [23] was downloaded from National Center
for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under
BioProject accession PRJNA398168. The RNA-Seq read distribution across the
genome was visualized by the UCSC genome browser [24], which includes a reference strain
for 1106a. The genomic region spanning genes fusR to
tar is highly similar between strain Bp 1106a and our
target strain Bp 1026b (identity = 99.4%). The RNA-Seq reads were pooled and
then mapped to the genome of strain 1106a using Bowtie2, which allows two
base-pair mismatch [25]. The RNA-Seq read density at each genomic position was
visualized by the UCSC genome browser [24] to determine putative transcription
boundaries of fusR and bucl8. Sigma 70
promoters (-10 and -35) were predicted by BPROM [26]. Translation initiation sites
(TISs) were predicted by TriTISA with default parameters [27]. The Shine-Dalgarno
(SD) translation initiation signals were manually annotated within 20 bps
upstream to TISs by considering “GGAG”, a SD consensus sequence annotated
for Burkholderia [28]. The gene and protein designation
were adopted according to Crutcher et al. 2017.
Prediction of FusR putative binding sites
The positions of the predicted FusR binding sites, a LysR-type
transcriptional regulator, were determined using the University of
Braunschweig Virtual Footprint Promoter analysis tool v3.0 [29]. Known LysR
regulators were used as models to predict binding, including CysB, MetR, and
OxyR from E. coli, GltC from
Bacillus subtilis, and OxyR from P.
aeruginosa. Standard settings were used to run the
prediction (sensitivity = 0.8, core sensitivity = 0.9, and size = 5) on the
500-bp region upstream from the translational start site of
bucl8.
Genetic and molecular biology methods
Construction of an unmarked isogenic deletion mutant of
bucl8 locus in Bp82
The chromosomal region in Bp82, encompassing genes
bucl8-fusCD-fusE, was deleted using suicide plasmid
pSL524 constructed in vector pMo130 (Addgene), as described previously
[22]. Two
Bp82-DNA fragments of about 1 kb each were sequentially cloned within the
multiple cloning site of pMo130: (i) pSL522 construct, containing
fusR gene located upstream of bucl8
was PCR-amplified with primers pSL522-ApaI-F and pSL522-HindIII-R, was
cloned between ApaI-HindIII sites of the
vector; and (ii) pSL524, containing tar gene located
downstream of fusE was cloned at ApaI
site, following amplification with primers pSL523-ApaI-2F and
pSL523-ApaI-2R.Plasmid pSL524 was introduced by conjugation into Bp82 via biparental mating
with a donor strain E. coli
S17-1λpir/pLFX::pSL524 on LA medium overnight. The mating bacteria were then
scraped off and plated onto selective LA medium supplemented with 200 μg/mL
kanamycin, to counter-select WT Bp82, and 50 μg/mL zeocin, to counter-select
E. coli. Merodiploid colonies
resulting from the single cross-over event, were sprayed with 0.45 M
pyrocatechol (Sigma-Aldrich) to detect yellow transconjugants [22]. Several yellow
colonies were streaked onto YT medium (10 mg/mL yeast extract, 10 mg/mL
tryptone) containing 15% sucrose to force the excision of the
bucl8-fusE locus and pMo130 sequence from Bp82
merodiploids. Colonies were grown for 48 hours. Successful excision produces
deletion mutants as white colonies identified by spraying with pyrocatechol.
White colonies were isolated and characterized by PCR and sequencing to
confirm the deletion of the bucl8-fusCD-fusE genes.
Cloning of bucl8 locus in E.
coli JM109
The cloning strategy was based on the genomic sequence of the Bp82 parent
strain B. pseudomallei 1026b, which
identified a ~8.2-kb StuI-StuI fragment,
encompassing the entire fusR-bucl8-fusCD-fusE locus. Bp82
gDNA was digested with StuI and DNA species of about 8–10
kb were isolated from the gel and ligated to StuI-cleaved
vector pUC18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp (pUC18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp was a gift from Heath
Damron, Addgene plasmid # 65024) [21].The E.
coli JM109 transformants were isolated on a LA medium
containing 100 μg/mL FA. Plasmid pSL525 was isolated from several colonies
and analyzed by restriction digestion. Junctions between vector and insert
sequences were sequenced to establish insert orientation. The presence of
fusR-bucl8-fusC-fusE genes was verified by PCR and
sequencing.The plasmid construct pSL529, containing the bucl8 sequence
with extended CL region from Bp K96243, was also generated based on pSL525.
An internal Bucl8 fragment from Bp K9264 (~1.4-kb) was PCR-amplified (using
primers Bucl8-1F and BurkhFusBCD-1R) and cloned between two unique sites in
bucl8, XcmI, and
FseI, of pSL525. E. coli
JM109 transformants were isolated on a LA medium containing 100 μg/mL
ampicillin. The plasmid sequence was verified as before.
Cloning, expression and purification of Bucl8-derived recombinant
proteins
Two recombinant polypeptides, derived from the presumed extracellular
portions of Bucl8 variant in Bp K96243, were generated for this study: (i)
pSL521-encoded rBucl8-CL-Ct polypeptide, containing both the collagen-like
region and the non-collagen C-terminal region and (ii) pSL520-encoded
rBucl8-Ct, which only includes the C-terminal region.For cloning, gBlocks (Integrated DNA Technologies) were designed, encoding
two recombinant constructs (S3 Table), as described [30]. gBlocks were used
as templates to produce cloned DNA inserts using primers pSL521-F and
pSL521-2R for pSL521 construct, and pSL520-F and pSL520-R for pSL520. gBlock
DNA fragments were inserted between HindIII and
BamHI sites of the pQE-30 vector, resulting in an
N-terminal 6xHis-tag (Qiagen) for each construct and were then cloned into
E. coli JM109. Plasmid constructs
pSL520 and pSL521 were confirmed by sequencing (Primers pQE30-F,
pQE30-2R).For protein expression, E. coli JM109 with
pSL520 or pSL521 constructs were grown in LBM plus 100 μg/mL ampicillin with
shaking at 37⁰C overnight, and then 10 mL cultures were used to inoculate 1
L batches of the same media. The protein expression was induced in cultures
at OD600 ~0.5 with 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside for
3 hours and then bacterial cells were pelleted and frozen at -20°C
overnight. Cell pellets were thawed and suspended in 10 mL of lysis buffer
(50 mM Tris buffer, 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 2% Triton X-100, 10
mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.2 mg/mL lysozyme, 1 mL of Protease inhibitor
(Pierce), 1 mM PMSF, 10 μg/mL). The samples were vortexed, placed on ice for
20 minutes, and then centrifuged. The supernatants were applied onto
affinity columns with HisPurTM Cobalt Resins (Thermo Fisher
Scientific) and purification was carried out according to manufacturer’s
protocol. The eluted proteins were analyzed by 4–20% SDS-PAGE to assess the
overall integrity and purity. The proteins were dialyzed in 25 mM HEPES and
stored at -20°C.
Ligand binding assay to rBucl8-CL-Ct and rBucl8-Ct
In the initial screening assay, binding of the rBucl8-CL-Ct to different
extracellular matrix (ECM) ligands was assessed by ELISA [31]. Wells were coated overnight with 1 μg
of each ligand dissolved in bicarbonate buffer: collagen type I and IV (Sigma),
elastin (Sigma), fibrinogen (Enzyme Research), plasma fibronectin (Sigma),
cellular fibronectin (Sigma), laminin (Gibco), and vitronectin (Sigma). Next, 1
μg per well of rBucl8-CL-Ct in TBS, 1% BSA was added and incubated for two hours
at 37°C. Wells were washed with TBS and bound rBucl8-CL-Ct was detected with
anti-6His-tag mouse mAb (Proteintech) in TBS-1% BSA and a secondary goat
anti-mouse HRP-conjugated Ab (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories Inc.);
immunoreactivity was detected with ABTS substrate and measured
spectrophotometrically at OD415. Data represent the mean ±SE of three
independent experiments (n = 3), each performed in triplicate wells.
Concentration-dependent binding was assessed in a similar manner, however with
varying concentrations (0–10 μM) of rBucl8-CL-Ct.
Structural characterization of Bucl8
Homology modelling of the periplasmic/outer membrane component of Bucl8 was
performed using the software MODELLER [32] and the structure of VceC from
V. cholerae as a template (PDB code 1yc9).
For the collagen-like (CL) region of Bucl8, homology modelling was performed
with MODELLER [32] using
the high-resolution structure of a collagen-like peptide (PDB code 1k6f) [33] as a template. The Ct
random coil region was generated using the Molefacture plugin of VMD [34]. Electrostatic
potential surface was computed using the software Chimera [35].Circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD) of rBucl8-derived polypeptides was performed
as previously described [30]. Briefly, protein samples were dialyzed against 1x Dulbecco’s
phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4. CD spectra were taken with a Jasco 810
spectropolarimeter, in a thermostatically controlled cuvette, with a path length
of 0.5 cm. Data were acquired at 10 nm per minute. Wavelength scans were
performed from 240 nm to 190 nm at either 25°C or 50°C for unfolded triple helix
in rBucl8-CL-Ct construct.
Gene transcription by RT-qPCR
Duplicated bacterial cultures of Bp82 and CLH001 were grown in broth media at
37°C with shaking till early logarithmic phase (OD600 ~0.4), then, FA
was added to one of each culture at sub-inhibitory concentrations and incubated
for one hour. Cultures were mixed with a 1:2 ratio of RNA Protect reagent,
incubated for five minutes, then centrifuged and decanted. Pellets were
suspended in lysing buffer (1.3 μg/μL proteinase K, 0.65 mg/mL lysozyme, TE; 10
mM Tris, 1mM EDTA, pH 7) and incubated for ten minutes. Total RNA was isolated
using RNeasy Protect Bacteria Mini kit (Qiagen). TurboDNase enzyme [36] was used to remove
traces of genomic DNA. RNA was either used immediately for cDNA synthesis or
stored at −80°C for no more than one week. cDNA was generated using iScript cDNA
synthesis kit (Bio-Rad).RT-qPCR was performed using SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad),
with primers listed in S1 Table. Transcript levels were normalized
to 16S rRNA [37].
Transcription fold change was calculated as relative to non-FA conditions, using
the 2-ΔΔ method. Technical and experimental
replicates were done in triplicate.
Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility/resistance
Antimicrobial susceptibility by broth dilution method
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing was performed in liquid and on
solid media. Initially, Bp82 and CLH001 were grown overnight at 37°C with
shaking to inoculate fresh media with varying concentrations of FA (32 μM to
8000 μM), as described [38]. The optical density was recorded after overnight incubation
and colony forming units (CFU) were calculated after plating serially
diluted samples on LA media.
Antimicrobial sensitivity on agar
Strains were also tested for growth on LA media supplemented with differing
concentrations of antimicrobials. Bacterial cultures were grown to an
optical density of ~0.4 and plated on agar, and incubated at 37°C for 48
hours. The following concentrations of antimicrobials were used: fusaric
acid (FA), 100–800 μg/mL [39]; para-hydroxybenzoic acid (pHBA), 0.5–2.5 mg/mL [40]; and
chloramphenicol (CHL), 2–32 μg/mL serially diluted [41].
Antimicrobial susceptibility in clinical laboratory
Strains were tested with antimicrobials in a clinical laboratory using Thermo
Sensititre GNX3F dehydrated 96-well plates (TREK Diagnostic Systems).
Bacterial cultures were grown on LA medium and cells were emulsified in
sterile water to turbidity of 0.5 McFarland. The suspension was then diluted
in cation adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with TES buffer before inoculation
of 100uL (approximately 5x105 CFU) into each antimicrobial test
well. Plates were incubated for 24 hours at 34–36°C in a non-CO2
incubator. Results were read and interpreted based on manufacturer’s
protocol and CLSI MIC interpretive guidelines. Antimicrobials tested
included: amikacin, doxycycline, gentamicin, minocycline, tobramycin,
tigecycline, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, levofloxacin,
aztreonam, imipenem, cefepime, meropenem, colistin, polymyxin, ceftazidime,
cefotaxime, ampicillin/sulbactam, doripenem, piperacillin/tazobactam,
ticarcillin/clavulanate.Antimicrobial susceptibility was also assessed by disk diffusion using the
following antimicrobials: ampicillin (Am 10), ciprofloxacin (CIP 5),
doxycycline (D 30), gentamycin (GM), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT),
tetracycline (TE 30), tobramycin (NN 10), levofloxacin (LVX 5).
Statistical analysis
Statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism software for two‐tailed paired
Student's t ‐test, one‐way and two‐way ANOVA, pending the
experiment. For gene expression of the bucl8 operon in Bp82,
statistical analysis was applied to log-transformed fold changes to account for
the phenomena of heteroscedasticity. Significance was denoted at levels of
*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01,
***p ≤ 0.001. Error bars represent standard error
measurements (SEM) with analyses based on three independent experimental repeats
(n = 3), each performed in triplicate technical replicates, unless otherwise
noted.
Results
Structural and functional characterization of the extended extracellular
domain of Bucl8
Bucl8 is a homotrimeric molecule, with each mature monomer comprised of two
tandem outer membrane efflux protein domains (OEP1 and OEP2), and a rare
repetitive region consisting of glycine, alanine, and serine (GAS)n
triplet repeats, here denoted as the CL domain, which is followed by a
non-collagen carboxyl-terminal (Ct) region (Fig 1A). We homology-modelled the structure
of Bucl8’s periplasmic/outer-membrane component, with the program MODELLER,
using the crystal structure of the outer membrane channel protein VceC from
V. cholerae (35.8% sequence identity;
Table 2) as a
template. In the homology model, the OEP1 domain is a typical α-barrel, formed
by twelve short helices and six long helices, spanning the periplasmic space.
The OEP2 domain forms a β-barrel, which crosses the outer membrane outwards
(Fig 1B). Bucl8’s
homology model can be superimposed over the structure of OprM (RMSD between the
two structures of 2.0 Å), which is an outer membrane component of the tripartite
efflux pump complex MexAB-OprM.
Fig 1
Structure analysis of the Bucl8 outer membrane protein.
(A) Schematic organization of Bucl8 structural organization (not to
scale). Bucl8 domains include: signal sequence (SS), outer membrane
efflux protein domains 1 and 2 (OEP1, OEP2), collagen-like region (CL)
and the C-terminus (Ct). The Bucl8 regions represented in recombinant
proteins rBucl8-CL-Ct and rBucl8-Ct are depicted. (B) Homology modeling
of Bucl8 intracellular OEP1-OEP2 region. Bucl8, modelled off the VceC
structure (pdb code 1YC9), is shown in transparent grey. Alpha chains of
Bucl8 periplasmic/outer-membrane domains (purple) superimposed onto OprM
(1wp1) α-chains (orange) are shown in solid ribbon representations. (C)
Structural modeling of Bucl8 extracellular CL-Ct region. Model depicts a
homotrimeric polypeptide consisting of triple-helical CL domain of
rBucl8-CL-Ct and unstructured C-terminus (rBucl8-Ct). The stick model in
the inset depicts the triple helical fold of repeating (GAS)n
collagen sequence of Bucl8-CL. (D) 4–20% SDS-PAGE analysis of
recombinant Bucl8-derived constructs. rBucl8-CL-Ct and rBucl8-Ct
polypeptides were expressed in E. coli
and purified via His-tag affinity chromatography (original, uncropped
gel image is shown in S1 Raw image). (E) Circular dichroism
(CD) spectroscopy. (Upper plot) Wavelength scans of rBucl8-CL-Ct were
performed at 25°C (solid line) and 50°C (dashed line). A drop in molar
ellipticity maximum at 220 nm (Θ220) is observed in the CD
spectra, indicating the transition from triple-helical (25°C) to
unfolded form (50°C). (Bottom plot) CD spectrum of rBucl8-Ct at 25°C
indicates an unstructured form.
Table 2
Sequence identities between Bucl8-associated efflux pump components
and known corresponding proteins.
Protein
Species
PDB code
Sequence identity (%)
Query cover (%)
Bucl8*
VceC
Vibrio cholerae
1YC9
35.8
63
NodT
Burkholderia mallei
6U94
31.6
61
CusC
Escherichia coli
3PIK
28.7
61
OprJ
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
PAO1
5AZS
29.9
61
OprM
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
1WP1
29.0
61
MtrE
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
4MT0
26.9
61
TolC
Escherichia coli
1EK9
24.7
38
FusC
FuaA
Stenotrophomonas
maltophilia
41.9
44
AaeB
Klebsiella pneumoniae
24.62
60
MexB
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
3W9I
NS
AcrB
Escherichia coli
4ZLJ
NS
CusA
Escherichia coli
3K07
NS
FusD
AcrZ
Escherichia coli
4C48
NS
CusF
Escherichia coli
3E6Z
NS
YajC
Escherichia coli
2RDD (in complex)
NS
FusE
MexA
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
30.99
48
AcrA
Escherichia coli
2F1M
27.27
48
BesA
Borreliella afzelii
4KKS
26.56
48
EmrA
Klebsiella pneumoniae
4TKO
26.73
86
CusB
Escherichia coli
3H94
NS
NS = No significant similarity
*Comparison to Bucl8 protein sequence without CL-Ct domains.
Structure analysis of the Bucl8 outer membrane protein.
(A) Schematic organization of Bucl8 structural organization (not to
scale). Bucl8 domains include: signal sequence (SS), outer membrane
efflux protein domains 1 and 2 (OEP1, OEP2), collagen-like region (CL)
and the C-terminus (Ct). The Bucl8 regions represented in recombinant
proteins rBucl8-CL-Ct and rBucl8-Ct are depicted. (B) Homology modeling
of Bucl8 intracellular OEP1-OEP2 region. Bucl8, modelled off the VceC
structure (pdb code 1YC9), is shown in transparent grey. Alpha chains of
Bucl8 periplasmic/outer-membrane domains (purple) superimposed onto OprM
(1wp1) α-chains (orange) are shown in solid ribbon representations. (C)
Structural modeling of Bucl8 extracellular CL-Ct region. Model depicts a
homotrimeric polypeptide consisting of triple-helical CL domain of
rBucl8-CL-Ct and unstructured C-terminus (rBucl8-Ct). The stick model in
the inset depicts the triple helical fold of repeating (GAS)n
collagen sequence of Bucl8-CL. (D) 4–20% SDS-PAGE analysis of
recombinant Bucl8-derived constructs. rBucl8-CL-Ct and rBucl8-Ct
polypeptides were expressed in E. coli
and purified via His-tag affinity chromatography (original, uncropped
gel image is shown in S1 Raw image). (E) Circular dichroism
(CD) spectroscopy. (Upper plot) Wavelength scans of rBucl8-CL-Ct were
performed at 25°C (solid line) and 50°C (dashed line). A drop in molar
ellipticity maximum at 220 nm (Θ220) is observed in the CD
spectra, indicating the transition from triple-helical (25°C) to
unfolded form (50°C). (Bottom plot) CD spectrum of rBucl8-Ct at 25°C
indicates an unstructured form.NS = No significant similarity*Comparison to Bucl8 protein sequence without CL-Ct domains.Following OEP2, towards the extracellular space, the trimeric structure of the
molecule supports a triple-helical structure of the extracellular
CL-(GAS)n domain (Fig 1C), although, the specific (GAS)n sequence has not
been studied previously for triple helix formation. The number of consecutive
(GAS)n repeats present fluctuates between Bucl8 variants from
different B. pseudomallei isolates. Analysis
of ~100 bucl8 alleles showed (GAS)n numbers ranging
from 6 to 38 repeats (mode: 20). Notably, 21 consecutive GAS repeats
characterize the Bucl8 of B. pseudomallei
model strain K96243, while the Bucl8 variants of the strains utilized in this
study have fewer (GAS)n numbers,
e.g., Bp 1026b/Bp82 has six and
B. mallei strain Bm ATCC 23344/CLH001 has
eight. Following the CL-(GAS)n domain is a Ct region of 72 amino
acids that are conserved among B. pseudomallei
and B. mallei strains (S1
File).Here, we homology-modelled a representative (GAS)19 sequence using the
structure of the collagen peptide (PPG10) 3 as a template
(PDB code 1k6f, seqid 36%) [33] and the software MODELLER (Fig 1C). This structure formed a triple helix
of about 163 Å in length. On its C-terminal end, the Ct domain of each chain is
predicted by JPRED to be unfolded and was modeled in a random coil conformation
(Fig 1C). Consistent
with the sequence composition of the (GAS)n repetitive domain, its
electrostatic potential surface appears neutral, with only a few positive
charges due to the presence of arginine residues in the unstructured Ct regions
of the molecule.To experimentally validate this homology-modelled structure of the extracellular
part of Bucl8, two recombinant proteins, derived from the extracellular portion
of Bucl8 variant in strain Bp K96243, were designed and expressed in
E. coli. The construct rBucl8-CL-Ct
includes the CL-(GAS)19 domain and adjacent unstructured C-terminus
(Ct), while construct rBucl8-Ct encompasses the Ct region only. Both
Bucl8-derived polypeptides migrate aberrantly in SDS-PAGE in relation to
molecular weight standards, e.g., rBucl8-CL-Ct
of expected 11.7 kDa and rBucl8-Ct of 7.8 kDa (Fig 1D). Structural analysis of rBucl8-CL-Ct
rendered at 25°C, using circular dichroism spectroscopy, confirmed a triple
helical structure, demonstrated by a shallow peak at 220 nm (Fig 1E). As a control,
denatured rBucl8-CL-Ct (50°C line) displayed a further-depressed peak at 220 nm
that no longer held a triple-helical collagen structure. The 220 nm peak in
rBucl8-CL-Ct is less pronounced when compared to typical triple helices formed
by perfect GPP collagen repeats. This feature suggests the coexistence of both
triple helix and random coil structures and/or the contribution of the
non-collagen Ct region to the spectrum; such effects on CD spectra were
previously reported for streptococcal collagen-like rScl constructs [42]. Additionally, the
rBucl8-Ct structure was also analyzed by circular dichroism spectroscopy. The
absence of ellipticity maxima and/or minima of known structures,
e.g., α-helices or β-strands [43], indicates an
unstructured protein (Fig
1E). Altogether, using in silico modeling and
experimental CD spectroscopic analyses of the representative recombinant
protein, we demonstrated that repeating (GAS)n of the predicted
Bucl8-CL region from B. pseudomallei and
B. mallei can form a stable collagen
triple helix; to our knowledge, this is the first such demonstration obtained
for the unusual repeating (GAS)n collagen-like sequence.Bacterial proteins harboring CL domains from diverse genera have been
demonstrated to bind ligands, including extracellular matrix proteins (ECM), and
have been shown to participate in pathogenesis [44-46]. Here, we screened several human
compounds by ELISA to ascertain a potential ligand binding function of Bucl8’s
extracellular region, rBucl8-CL-Ct; ligands included fibrinogen, collagen-I and
IV, elastin, plasma and cellular fibronectin, and vitronectin. Of the ligands
tested, rBucl8-CL-Ct construct showed significant binding to fibrinogen, but not
to collagen I and elastin (Fig
2A), while binding to other ligands tested was also not significant
(not shown). rBucl8-CL-Ct binding to fibrinogen-coated wells was
concentration-dependent in contrast to control BSA-coated wells. In addition,
rBucl8-Ct construct showed limited level of binding to fibrinogen in this assay
(Fig 2B).
Fig 2
Binding of rBucl8-derived constructs to extracellular matrix
proteins.
(A) Screening assay for rBucl8-CL-Ct binding to extracellular matrix
proteins. Ligand binding was tested by ELISA; representative examples of
rBucl8-CL-Ct-binding-positive and binding-negative ligands are shown.
rBucl8-CL-Ct binding was compared statistically with binding to
BSA-coated wells plus two standard deviations; Student’s
t-test, **p ≤ 0.01. (B)
Concentration-dependent binding of rBucl8-CL-Ct and rBucl8-Ct to
fibrinogen. Wells were coated with fibrinogen and either recombinant
Bucl8-derived protein was added at increasing concentrations. Data
represents the mean ±SEM of three independent experiments (n = 3), each
performed in triplicate wells. Binding was detected with an anti-His-tag
mAb.
Binding of rBucl8-derived constructs to extracellular matrix
proteins.
(A) Screening assay for rBucl8-CL-Ct binding to extracellular matrix
proteins. Ligand binding was tested by ELISA; representative examples of
rBucl8-CL-Ct-binding-positive and binding-negative ligands are shown.
rBucl8-CL-Ct binding was compared statistically with binding to
BSA-coated wells plus two standard deviations; Student’s
t-test, **p ≤ 0.01. (B)
Concentration-dependent binding of rBucl8-CL-Ct and rBucl8-Ct to
fibrinogen. Wells were coated with fibrinogen and either recombinant
Bucl8-derived protein was added at increasing concentrations. Data
represents the mean ±SEM of three independent experiments (n = 3), each
performed in triplicate wells. Binding was detected with an anti-His-tag
mAb.
Identification of bucl8 operon in Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia
mallei
Previously, we identified two tandem outer-membrane-efflux-protein domains in
Bucl8 [15], leading to
the current hypothesis that Bucl8 is the outer membrane component of an efflux
pump. Genes encoding efflux pumps are often clustered in operons that are
controlled in cis by transcriptional regulators, such as MexR
of P. aeruginosa and AmrR of
B. pseudomallei [47-49]. For this reason, we examined the genes
surrounding bucl8, which are described in Table 3 and depicted in
Fig 3A. The locus
contains additional efflux-pump associated genes, annotated in the NCBI database
to be involved in fusaric acid (FA) resistance, which we designated here as
‘fus’, as previously proposed [39]. In agreement with genomic annotations,
we recognize that Bucl8 is an outer membrane lipoprotein with a lipid moiety
attached via the N-terminal Cys residue of the mature protein (Fig 3B; residue No. 24). In
the genome of B. pseudomallei 1026b,
downstream of bucl8 (OMP; 594 aa) are: fusC,
presumably encoding the inner membrane protein of the pump (IMP; 733 aa),
fusD, encoding a small protein with domain of unknown
function (DUF; 67 aa), and fusE encoding the periplasmic
adaptor protein (PAP; 293 aa). The ATG start codon of fusD
overlaps with a stop TGA codon of fusC. The direction of the
next downstream gene, tar, is opposite to
bucl8-fusCDE and was presumed by
definition to be outside of this operon. Flanking the locus at the 5’ end of
bucl8 is a divergently-oriented gene, encoding a LysR-type
transcriptional regulator (LysR; 313 aa) [50], designated here as
fusR. The proximity and opposite orientation of
fusR gene in relation to the bucl8-fusE
genes resembled the typical gene organization described in tripartite efflux
pumps with LysR-type regulators; therefore, we hypothesized
bucl8 transcription to be regulated by the
fusR product. Using predictive software and analysis of
transcriptome data, the promoters, transcription initiation sites (TIS), and
FusR binding sites were identified in the intergenic region between
fusR and bucl8 (Fig 3B). FusR was predicted to have four
binding sites, depicted in the green boxes that overlap with the
bucl8–10 and -35 sites. The consensus sequence for
B. pseudomallei is “GGAG”, according to
the ProTISA database [27], which matches bucl8’s predicted Shine-Dalgarno
sequence. Thus, fusR-bucl8-fusCD-fusE constitute a regulon,
likely involved in FA resistance. The bucl8 locus was also
conserved in Bp strain K96243 and Bm ATTC 23344; however, transcriptional units
of bucl8-fusE were on the positive strand in the genome of
K96243 strain, and on the negative strand in Bp 1026b and Bm ATTC 23344 (Table 3).
Table 3
Genes and associated identification numbers of bucl8
locus.
Bp 1026b
Bp K96243
Bm ATTC 23344
Gene
Product
Annotation
Locus
tag
Protein
ID
Genomic
position
Locus
tag
Protein
ID
Genomic
position
Locus
tag
Protein
ID
Genomic
position
fusR
Transcriptional regulator
BP1026B_I1940
AFI66557.1
2150545–2151486
BPS_RS10485
WP_004534689.1
2345922–2346863
BMA_RS04430
WP_004191155.1
987878–988819
bucl8
RND efflux system, outer membrane
lipoprotein, NodT family protein
BP1026B_I1941
AFI66559.1
2151644–2153428
BPS_RS10490
WP_162486666.1
2347036–2348973
BMA_RS04425
WP_024900385.1
985939–987705
Fusc
Fusaric acid resistance protein
BP1026B_I1942
AFI66560.1
2153445–2155646
BPS_RS10495
WP_009937757.1
2348990–2351191
BMA_RS04420
WP_004192976.1
983721–985922
fusD
Hypothetical protein
BP1026B_I1943
AFI66561.1
2155643–2155846
BPS_RS10500
WP_004191885.1
2351188–2351391
BMA_RS04415
WP_004191885.1
983521–983724
fusE
Fusaric acid resistance protein
fusE
BP1026B_I1944
AFI66562.1
2155860–2156741
BPS_RS10505
WP_004534908.1
2351405–2352286
BMA_RS04410
WP_004191342.1
982626–983507
Tar
Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein
BP1026B_I1945
AFI66563.1
2157092–2158768
BPS_RS10510
WP_004196082.1
2352657–2354333
BMA_RS04405
WP_004196082.1
980610–982286
Data were retrieved from NCBI for B.
pseudomallei 1026b, B.
pseudomallei K96243, and B.
mallei ATTC 23344 reference genomes.
Fig 3
Chromosomal locus surrounding bucl8 gene in
B. pseudomallei and
B. mallei.
(A) Schematic of bucl8-associated locus with presumed
protein function (subscript) and amino acid length (aa). Upstream of
bucl8 is gene fusR, while
downstream are genes fusCD and fusE.
Flanking the bucl8 operon is unrelated downstream gene
tar. LysR, LysR-type transcriptional regulator;
OMP, Outer membrane protein; IMP, Inner membrane protein; DUF, Domain of
unknown function; and PAP, periplasmic adaptor protein. (B) Regulatory
intergenic region between fusR and
bucl8. Both nucleotide and translated sequence are
shown. Red arrow indicates cleavage site between the signal peptide and
N-terminal cysteine linker (bolded).
Chromosomal locus surrounding bucl8 gene in
B. pseudomallei and
B. mallei.
(A) Schematic of bucl8-associated locus with presumed
protein function (subscript) and amino acid length (aa). Upstream of
bucl8 is gene fusR, while
downstream are genes fusCD and fusE.
Flanking the bucl8 operon is unrelated downstream gene
tar. LysR, LysR-type transcriptional regulator;
OMP, Outer membrane protein; IMP, Inner membrane protein; DUF, Domain of
unknown function; and PAP, periplasmic adaptor protein. (B) Regulatory
intergenic region between fusR and
bucl8. Both nucleotide and translated sequence are
shown. Red arrow indicates cleavage site between the signal peptide and
N-terminal cysteine linker (bolded).Data were retrieved from NCBI for B.
pseudomallei 1026b, B.
pseudomallei K96243, and B.
mallei ATTC 23344 reference genomes.
Fusaric acid increases relative expression of bucl8-operon
transcripts
We identified a conserved operon associated with the bucl8 gene
that was present in all B. pseudomallei and
B. mallei genomes analyzed, including the
mutant strains Bp82 and CLH001 used in this study, and had similarity to genes
encoding FA resistance found in other Gram-negative bacteria [17, 18, 39]. We consequently tested the predicted
FA substrate as a transcriptional inducer for genes associated with the
Bucl8-efflux pump. We first examined the FA minimum inhibitory concentration
(MIC) in B. pseudomallei (Bp82) and
B. mallei (CLH001) strains using a broth
dilution method in the range of 32 μM FA to 8000 μM, which was based on an
earlier induction data employing GFP reporter construct in P.
putida [38]. Here, we established the FA-MIC for Bp82 as 4000 μM (716 μg/mL)
and 250 μM (44 μg/mL) for CLH001.Sub-inhibitory concentrations of FA, e.g., 1000
μM for Bp82 and 60 μM for CLH001 that did not inhibit the growth rates were used
in subsequent induction experiments (Fig 4A). Total RNA was isolated from the
cultures of Bp82 and CLH001 that were either non-treated or treated with FA
(1000 μM or 60 μM, accordingly) at OD600 ~0.4 for one hour. Both
fusR and bucl8 genes were expressed in
non-treated cultures at basal levels, but transcription of
bucl8 in Bp82 was significantly induced with FA by an
average 82-fold change in relative expression and a 20-fold change of
fusR, using 2ΔΔCt calculations (Fig 4B). CLH001 also
demonstrated about a four-fold increase for fusR and
bucl8 when induced with 60 μM FA (Fig 4C), although this change is
comparatively lower than that recorded in FA-induced Bp82.
Fig 4
Effect of FA and pHBA on gene transcription within
fusR-bucl8-fusCD-fusE operon.
(A) Growth curves of B. pseudomallei
strain Bp82 and B. mallei strain
CLH001. Cultures were grown in strain-specific broth and optical density
(O.D.) and colony forming units (CFU) were recorded. Dotted line
represents OD of 0.4. Error bars represent ±SEM. (B-D) RT-qPCR was
performed on RNA samples isolated from cultures of the indicated strain,
untreated and treated with substrate, at an OD600 of ~0.4 for
1 hour. Graph shows fold change of relative gene expression compared to
untreated cultures and normalized to transcription of 16S rRNA gene.
Technical and experimental replicates were done in triplicate. One-way
ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test of the log10 –transformed
fold change. Significance shown is in comparison to
tar; ***p < 0.001. Error bars represent ±SEM. (B)
Transcription activation of fusR-bucl8-fusCD-fusE genes
in Bp82 with 1000 μM FA. The downstream tar gene is
assumed outside of the fusR-bucl8 operon. (C)
Transcription activation of fusR and
bucl8 in CLH001 with 60 μM FA. (D) Transcription
activation of Bucl8 regulon in Bp82 with 6.25 mM pHBA.
Effect of FA and pHBA on gene transcription within
fusR-bucl8-fusCD-fusE operon.
(A) Growth curves of B. pseudomallei
strain Bp82 and B. mallei strain
CLH001. Cultures were grown in strain-specific broth and optical density
(O.D.) and colony forming units (CFU) were recorded. Dotted line
represents OD of 0.4. Error bars represent ±SEM. (B-D) RT-qPCR was
performed on RNA samples isolated from cultures of the indicated strain,
untreated and treated with substrate, at an OD600 of ~0.4 for
1 hour. Graph shows fold change of relative gene expression compared to
untreated cultures and normalized to transcription of 16S rRNA gene.
Technical and experimental replicates were done in triplicate. One-way
ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test of the log10 –transformed
fold change. Significance shown is in comparison to
tar; ***p < 0.001. Error bars represent ±SEM. (B)
Transcription activation of fusR-bucl8-fusCD-fusE genes
in Bp82 with 1000 μM FA. The downstream tar gene is
assumed outside of the fusR-bucl8 operon. (C)
Transcription activation of fusR and
bucl8 in CLH001 with 60 μM FA. (D) Transcription
activation of Bucl8 regulon in Bp82 with 6.25 mM pHBA.In a following experiment we confirmed the boundaries of the
fusR-bucl8 operon by RT-qPCR. Results show
that transcription levels of
fusR-bucl8-fusC-fusE were all
significantly upregulated in samples treated with FA, compared to non-treated
controls (fusR = 20-fold ± 1.37; bucl8 =
82-fold ± 8.73; fusC = 40-fold ± 2.84; fusE =
86-fold ± 10.65; Fig 4B). In
contrast, the expression change of tar was significantly lower
than genes from the fusR-bucl8-fusC-fusE
operon and the associated regulatory gene fusR (1.5-fold ±
0.03. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test of the
log10-transformed fold change; ***p < 0.001
for all genes compared to tar). This is the first demonstration
of FA-inducible efflux pump in B. pseudomallei
and B. mallei.
A structural analog of fusaric acid pHBA induces pump expression
Previous work reported that FusC-containing FA-exuding pumps were
phylogenetically related to the aromatic carboxylic acid (AaeB) pumps, although
it was unknown whether AaeB systems extrude FA [39]. Notably, studies in
E. coli show that regulated concentrations of
an FA-derivative, para-hydroxybenzoic acid (pHBA), inside bacterial cells is
important for balanced metabolism of the aromatic carboxylic acids [40]. Thus, we hypothesized
pHBA would also increase the relative expression of the bucl8
operon as FA did. Broth cultures of Bp82Δbucl8-fusE were
induced with the sub-inhibitory concentration of 6.25 mM (863 μg/mL) pHBA and
compared to non-treated cultures. RT-qPCR data showed in Bp82pHBA induced a
7-fold ± 0.26 change in fusR, an 18-fold ± 0.78 change in
bucl8, a 19-fold ± 0.98 change in fusC,
and a 9-fold ± 0.52 change in fusE. Transcription of
tar was not significantly affected (1.4 fold ± 0.006
change; One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test of the
log10-transformed fold change; ***p < 0.001
for all genes compared to tar) (Fig 4D). Evidence that aromatic carboxylic
acids can induce transcription of this pump may help elucidate the broader
function of Bucl8-associated pump in B. pseudomallei
and B. mallei.
Deletion of of and complementation with the Bucl8-associated pump affect
sensitivity and resistance to FA and pHBA
In order to demonstrate the function of the Bucl8-pump in various physiological
roles, we used a genetic approach by generating two strains for assessing (i)
loss-of-function and (ii) gain-of function. For loss-of-function, we made an
isogenic Bp82 mutant harboring chromosomal deletion of
bucl8-fusCD-fusE segment, as described [22]. Plasmid pSL524 (Table 1) was constructed in
the E. coli vector pMo130, which is suicidal
in Burkholderia, to generate an unmarked deletion mutant (Fig 5A). Construct pSL524,
carrying upstream and downstream sequences flanking bucl8 locus
was transferred to B. pseudomalleiBp82 via
biparental mating. Deletion was achieved in a two-step insertion/excision
process, as detailed in Materials and Methods section. Successful deletion of
the bucl8-fusCD-fusE segment from the chromosome was confirmed
by PCR (Fig 5B) and
sequencing. We did not delete the fusR gene on purpose to avoid
a possible global regulatory effect associated with unknown FusR function.
Fig 5
Construction of an unmarked Bucl8-associated pump deletion mutant and
complementation in a heterologous host.
(A) Strategy for generating an unmarked Bucl8-pump deletion mutant.
Construction of the suicide plasmid construct pSL524. Vector pMo130,
which is suicide in Burkholderia, was used to generate
pSL524 plasmid construct for mutagenesis. HindIII and
ApaI sites were utilized to clone flanking regions
containing fusR and tar sequences to
delete the bucl8-fusE coding region, depicted below.
(B) Analysis of the bucl8-fusE deletion mutant of Bp82
by PCR. The presence of bucl8-fusE genes was tested in
the genomic DNA isolated from wild type Bp82 (WT) and Bp82
bucl8-fusE mutant (Δ). (C) Cloning of the
Bucl8-pump locus for in-trans complementation in
E. coli. Vector
pUCT18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp was used for cloning of an 8.2-kb genomic Bp82
fragment, flanked by StuI sites, encompassing
bucl8 locus. (D) Characterization of the pSL525 and
pSL529 constructs. The presence of fusR-fusE genes on
pSL525 and pSL529 plasmids was tested by PCR. PCR products shown in B
and D were analyzed on 1.3% agarose gel.
Construction of an unmarked Bucl8-associated pump deletion mutant and
complementation in a heterologous host.
(A) Strategy for generating an unmarked Bucl8-pump deletion mutant.
Construction of the suicide plasmid construct pSL524. Vector pMo130,
which is suicide in Burkholderia, was used to generate
pSL524 plasmid construct for mutagenesis. HindIII and
ApaI sites were utilized to clone flanking regions
containing fusR and tar sequences to
delete the bucl8-fusE coding region, depicted below.
(B) Analysis of the bucl8-fusE deletion mutant of Bp82
by PCR. The presence of bucl8-fusE genes was tested in
the genomic DNA isolated from wild type Bp82 (WT) and Bp82bucl8-fusE mutant (Δ). (C) Cloning of the
Bucl8-pump locus for in-trans complementation in
E. coli. Vector
pUCT18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp was used for cloning of an 8.2-kb genomic Bp82
fragment, flanked by StuI sites, encompassing
bucl8 locus. (D) Characterization of the pSL525 and
pSL529 constructs. The presence of fusR-fusE genes on
pSL525 and pSL529 plasmids was tested by PCR. PCR products shown in B
and D were analyzed on 1.3% agarose gel.To exhibit gain-of function, we complemented a heterologous E.
coli host in-trans with a plasmid
construct pSL525 (Table 1)
harboring the whole bucl8 locus, generated in a mini-transposon
vector pUC18T-mini-Tn7T-Tp, as depicted in Fig 5C. JM109::525 transformants were
selected on agar containing 100 μg/mL FA and cloning was verified by PCR (Fig 5D) and sequencing. Since
Bp82 represents the 1026b strain harboring Bucl8 variant with (GAS)6
repeats in the CL region, we made an additional construct, pSL529, that contains
(GAS)21 repeats, to represent the majority of B.
pseudomallei strains, by extending the number of GAS
triplets in pSL525.MICs were determined for bacterial growth on LA plates containing FA or pHBA
chemicals, ranging from 0 to 800 μg/mL FA and 500–2,500 μg/mL pHBA (Fig 6A). There was a 4-fold
decrease in MIC to FA from 400 μg/mL to 100 μg/mL recorded for
Bp82Δbucl8-fusE mutant compared to the parental Bp82
strain. A similar effect was observed for pHBA; the MIC for Bp82 was 1500 μg/mL
which decreased to 1000 μg/mL in the mutant. A 12-fold increased MIC on the LA
medium with FA was recorded in E. coli
JM109::525 and JM109::529 (MIC = 300 μg/mL) compared with the JM109 (MIC = 25
μg/mL) recipient. Interestingly, complementation with whole Bucl8-associated
pump, however, did not increase the MIC for pHBA above 1000 μg/mL for JM109::525
or JM109:529 strains.
Fig 6
Analysis of loss-of-function and gain-of-function associated with
chromosomal deletion and in-trans complementation of
Bucl8-pump components.
(A) Changes in sensitivity/resistance patterns in bacterial strains. MIC
was determined by plating bacteria on LA containing each substrate. FA,
fusaric acid; pHBA, para-hydroxybenzoic acid; CHL, chloramphenicol. (B)
Relative expression of fusC genes. RT-qPCR was
performed on total mRNA isolated from non-treated and FA-treated (1000
μM, 1 hour) Bp82 cultures (OD600 ~0.4). Graph shows fold
change of relative gene expression compared to untreated cultures and
normalized to 16S rRNA. Technical and experimental replicates were done
in triplicate. (C-D) Effect of chromosomal deletion on growth. Parental
strain Bp82 and its bucl8-fusE deletion mutant
(Bp82Dbucl8-fusE) were grown in LBM broth at 37°C
with shaking. Changes in OD600 (C) were recorded and CFU
numbers (D) by plating on LA medium every hour. Data represents the
average of three biological replicates. 2-way AVOVA with Tukey multiple
comparison test, ***p < 0.001. Error bars represent
±SEM.
Analysis of loss-of-function and gain-of-function associated with
chromosomal deletion and in-trans complementation of
Bucl8-pump components.
(A) Changes in sensitivity/resistance patterns in bacterial strains. MIC
was determined by plating bacteria on LA containing each substrate. FA,
fusaric acid; pHBA, para-hydroxybenzoic acid; CHL, chloramphenicol. (B)
Relative expression of fusC genes. RT-qPCR was
performed on total mRNA isolated from non-treated and FA-treated (1000
μM, 1 hour) Bp82 cultures (OD600 ~0.4). Graph shows fold
change of relative gene expression compared to untreated cultures and
normalized to 16S rRNA. Technical and experimental replicates were done
in triplicate. (C-D) Effect of chromosomal deletion on growth. Parental
strain Bp82 and its bucl8-fusE deletion mutant
(Bp82Dbucl8-fusE) were grown in LBM broth at 37°C
with shaking. Changes in OD600 (C) were recorded and CFU
numbers (D) by plating on LA medium every hour. Data represents the
average of three biological replicates. 2-way AVOVA with Tukey multiple
comparison test, ***p < 0.001. Error bars represent
±SEM.Although deletion of the Bucl8-associated pump resulted in a drastically
decreased MIC, Bp82Δbucl8-fusE mutant still maintained residual
level of FA resistance (100 μg/mL). Therefore, we hypothesized that additional
proteins annotated as FusC are contributing to the remaining FA resistance
recorded in the Bp82Δbucl8-fusE mutant. Within Bp 1026b and
K96243 genomes, there are six genes present that are annotated as FusC-type
proteins (Pfam #PF04632), including the protein arbitrarily designated as FusC,
which is associated with Bucl8, whereas remaining five were designated FusC 2
thru FusC 6 (S2
Table). These protein sequences ranged roughly in three different
lengths: ~200 amino acids for FusC 3, ~350 for FusC 4 and 6, and ~750 amino
acids for FusC, FusC 2 and FusC 5. Upon examination, the loci around FusC genes
2 thru 6 were not arranged in as discernable tripartite-pump operons, like FusC,
although some were adjacent to either a MFS transporter protein or genes
encoding amino acid permeases. To test whether these genes are regulated by FA
addition, we performed RT-qPCR on RNA isolated from Bp82 cultures induced with
1000 μM FA and without treatment. The transcription of fusC 2–6
genes showed little to no fold-change (0–2-fold; Fig 6B) when compared to non-treated samples,
which contrasts with ~40-fold difference in fusC transcription
(Fig 4B). Thus, we
conclude that these fusC genes are not inducible by FA.
Bucl8-associated pump does not contribute to the Multidrug Resistance (MDR)
phenotype
Efflux pumps contribute to MDR in Gram-negative bacteria [13], including
Burkholderia species [9], and are often polyspecific [51]. A study in
S. maltophilia concluded that an FA efflux
pump did not extrude the antimicrobials tested [52]. Here, we assessed changes in
resistance/susceptibility levels between Bp82 and
Bp82Δbucl8-fusE, and JM109 and JM109::525 or JM109:529
against variety of antimicrobials.In the clinical laboratory setting, the Burkholderia failed to
grow in commercial medium, and therefore only the E.
coli data were generated. Overall, there was not a
significant increase in resistance to any of the antibiotics tested;
JM109::525/529 showed only increased resistance to the β-lactam antibiotics,
which was associated with the resistance gene present on the inserted plasmid. A
disc diffusion test, including ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin,
tobramycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, doxycycline, and
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, resulted in similar zones of inhibition for both
Bp82 and Bp82Δbucl8-fusE cultures, as well as
E. coli JM109 and JM109::525/529, again
with the exception of the plasmid-derived β-lactam resistance determinant.Microarray data comparing the effect of 84 growth conditions on
B. pseudomallei transcriptome showed that
chloramphenicol (CHL), which contains an aromatic ring in its structure, induced
bucl8 expression, thus, implying CHL might be a substrate
for Bucl8-associated pump [53]. Here, we determined the CHL-MICs of our B.
pseudomallei and E. coli
strains using a growth assay on the LA medium; however, the MIC for all the
strains was the same (8 μg/mL; Fig
6A). In addition, the exogenous CHL at 8 μg/mL or 4 μg/mL
concentrations did not significantly induced the transcription of
bucl8-associated genes (not shown). Thus, our results
indicate the Bucl8-associated pump is not needed for CHL resistance in
B. pseudomallei [52].
Deletion of Bucl8-associated pump components affects cell growth
Efflux pumps extrude a variety of compounds that are toxic to the cells and play
physiological functions linked to pathogenesis [14]. We observed the growth of the
BpΔbucl8-fusE mutant was considerably reduced than that of
the parent Bp82 and did not reach the same OD600 in the stationary
phase (Fig 6C). CFU for Bp82
increased by approximately four logs, while the mutant increased by two logs
from hour 0 to 12. (Fig 6D).
These results suggest that the pump components are needed for normal growth
physiology under laboratory conditions in rich medium.
Discussion
The protein Bucl8 was previously predicted to be the outer membrane protein in
B. pseudomallei and B.
mallei. Comparative genomics studies between
B. mallei and B.
pseudomallei have suggested that conserved genes between the
species are likely critical for host-survival, while genes useful for saprophytic
life-style and adaptability were selected against [7]. The presence of the bucl8
genes, in particular the acquisition and conservation of the extracellular
Bucl8-CL-Ct domain, in B. pseudomallei and
B. mallei suggests that these genes are
selected for because they are useful for bacterial survival in both the environment
and in the host. Here, we carried out structure-function studies of the Bucl8
protein and the role of the putative Bucl8-associated efflux pump in antimicrobial
resistance, ligand binding, and cell physiology of B.
pseudomallei and B. mallei
(Fig 7).
Fig 7
Model of assembled Bucl8-associated efflux pump components and
substrates.
Cartoon representation of assembled the Bucl8-associated efflux pump
components: Bucl8OMP, FusCIMP, FusDDUF, and
FusEPAP. The extended CL-Ct structure is predicted to
transverse the outer membrane into the extracellular space and to bind
fibrinogen (Fbn). Aromatic substrates, such as experimentally-confirmed
fusaric acid (FA) and p-hydroxybenzoic acid (pHBA), as well
as putative p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) and salicylate, are
shown. OM; outer membrane. IM; inner membrane.
Model of assembled Bucl8-associated efflux pump components and
substrates.
Cartoon representation of assembled the Bucl8-associated efflux pump
components: Bucl8OMP, FusCIMP, FusDDUF, and
FusEPAP. The extended CL-Ct structure is predicted to
transverse the outer membrane into the extracellular space and to bind
fibrinogen (Fbn). Aromatic substrates, such as experimentally-confirmed
fusaric acid (FA) and p-hydroxybenzoic acid (pHBA), as well
as putative p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) and salicylate, are
shown. OM; outer membrane. IM; inner membrane.Bucl8 is a homotrimeric protein that spans the periplasmic and outer membrane to
reach the extracellular region of the cell. Crystal structures of the
membrane-spanning region have been reported for a number of homologous proteins,
including VceC and OprM (Table
2). Superposition of the homology model of Bucl8, with the crystal
structure of OprM from P. aeruginosa shows a
strong structural conservation of both OEP1 and OEP2 domains, with root mean square
deviation (RMSD) between the two structures of 2.0 Å (Fig 1B). Full structural conservation of all
helices of OEP1 provides similar dimensions of the middle bulge of the OEP1 domain
that accommodates substrates and suggest a similar mechanism of
funnel-channel-structure mediated transport across the outer membrane.The most puzzling feature of Bucl8 is the extracellular portion, which embeds a
collagen like triple helix. In the absence of hydroxyprolines that stabilize the
triple helical structure of mammalian collagen, bacterial collagens adopt
alternative stabilization mechanisms to form stable triple helices [54]. While some prokaryotic
collagens utilize a variety of GXY-repeat types, such as streptococcal collagen-like
proteins Scl1 and Scl2 [55],
others possess a limited number of triplets, including Bacillus Bcl
proteins [56, 57]. The CL regions of various
Bucl proteins utilize relatively few distinct triplet types [15]. An extreme case is the Bucl8-CL region,
which is exclusively made of a rare repeating (GAS)n sequence. Our
results are consistent with studies of triple helix propensity based on host-guest
peptide studies, showing reasonable propensities of (GAS)n triplets to
form triple helical structures. The Tm value of (GAS)n tripeptide unit in
a triple helix is 33.0°C, compared to 47.3°C of (POG)n tripeptide (O is
hydroxyproline), although, the physical anchoring of a CL domain increases Tm by
additional 2°C [58]. This
relatively low Tm may suggest structural flexibility of the Bucl8 extracellular
domain under physiological conditions, thus, allowing efflux pump for dual
function.Our laboratory and others have shown that bacterial collagen-like proteins
participate in pathogenesis via a variety of functions, including immune evasion,
cell adhesion, biofilm formation, and autoaggregation [44–46, 59]. Here, we report that the recombinant
rBucl8-CL-Ct polypeptide binds to fibrinogen significantly better than rBucl8-Ct
polypeptide. A similar phenomenon was recently reported for Scl1, where the
effective binding to fibronectin, directly mediated by the globular V domain,
required the presence of adjacent Scl1-CL domain [30]. Fibrinogen is a circulating glycoprotein
that is involved in blood clotting and promoting wound healing [60]; we do not know the
location of Bucl8 binding site on this multidomain protein. In the scope of
pathogenesis, some Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria use fibrinogen for
biofilm formation and bacterial adhesion. For example, fibrinogen-binding factors
and clumping-factors of Staphylococcus aureus have been shown to
increase adherence and virulence [61-63].
B. pseudomallei and B.
mallei both cause cutaneous infections that lead to lesions and
nodules, thus binding to wound factors could increase colonization. In addition, it
is likely that unidentified ligand(s), other than fibrinogen, may exist in the
environment to support a saprophytic lifestyle of B.
pseudomallei.bucl8-operon expression is regulated by a LysR-type transcriptional
regulator, designated here as FusRLysR. LysR-type family regulators are
the most abundant class of the prokaryotic transcriptional regulators that monitor
the expression of genes involved in pathogenesis, metabolism, quorum sensing and
motility, toxin production, and more physiological and virulence traits [50]. LysR proteins are
tetrameric and consist of two dimers that bind and bend the DNA within promoter
regions, thus, affecting the gene transcription. After the co-inducer binds to the
LysR dimers, the DNA is relaxed, allowing one dimer to come into contact with the
RNA polymerase to form an active transcription complex. In this study, the FusR
binding sites were identified within the intergenic promoter region between
bucl8 and fusR in B.
pseudomallei and B. mallei.
Thus, we hypothesized that FA can act as a co-inducer for the
bucl8-operon.We show that exogenous fusaric acid (FA) induces the transcription of the
fusR-bucl8-fusCD-fusE operon, therefore, confirming Bucl8 is a
component of a previously unreported FA-inducible efflux pump in B.
pseudomallei and B. mallei.
Similarly, an inducible FA tripartite efflux pump, encoded by
fuaABC operon, was identified in another soil saprophyte
S. maltophilia [52]. However, the gene/protein arrangement,
e.g. sequence orientation and length, places
the bucl8 operon within clade III of a phylogenetic tree of
predicted FusC-associated operons, while fuaABC operon is in clade
IV [39]. In addition to FA,
the FA-derivative pHBA also induced the expression of the bucl8
operon. Interestingly, although the genes and intergenic regions are highly similar,
transcription of fusR and bucl8 in FA-induced
B. mallei culture is considerably reduced
compared to B. pseudomallei. Likewise, the MIC
levels for FA and pHBA were lower in B. mallei,
although the bucl8 loci are conserved between B.
pseudomallei 1026b and B.
mallei ATCC23344. There may be other factors affecting
transcription, such as additional regulatory circuits for processing FA and similar
compounds in both organisms. For similarity, another efflux pump in
B. pseudomallei, BpeEF-OprC, is regulated by
two highly similar LysR-type transcriptional regulators, BpeT and BpeS [64]. Further studies are needed
to identify if there are other regulators or environmental stress/factors that could
be affecting upstream/downstream targets.Efflux systems are categorized into families by sequence similarity,
structure–including protein fold, conserved domains, and number of transmembrane
spanning regions–as well as by their energy source and substrates [65]. It is not known whether
the Bucl8-associated pump relies on ATP hydrolysis to transport FA, but the
associated FusCIMP transporter does not contain an ATP-binding domain,
therefore, it is an unlikely an ABC-type transporter. In Fusarium,
the synthesized intracellular FA is extruded by a predicted MFS-type transporter
FUBT [66]. MFS transporters
are typically single-component transporters, such as LacY, QacA or NorA [67, 68]; however, some MFS proteins partner with
outer membrane and periplasmic adaptor components to form tripartite complexes, such
as that of EmrA-EmrB-TolC in E. coli [69]. FusC (733 aa) is likely
not an MFS transporter because it is larger than the typical length of MFS proteins
(400–600 aa), does not contain well-conserved MFS motifs [68], and as we show is a component of a
tetrapartite operon. Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis of bacterial efflux systems
implied that FuaABC tripartite FA efflux pump in S.
maltophilia forms a separate branch from other bacterial efflux
pump families, branching off between the ABC and RND families [52]; of note, the Bucl8-associated FusC in B.
pseudomallei and B. mallei has a 41.9% sequence identity to FuaA (Table 2). For these reasons, we
think that the Bucl8-associated efflux pump is similar to an RND-type complex.Here, we adopted the gene designation proposed by Crutcher et al.,
which also includes a fourth pump component, a small polypeptide DUF, for the
Bucl8-associated tetrapartite efflux system. This situation might be more common
among known tripartite efflux pumps than currently acknowledged; for example, small
polypeptides YajC and AcrZ were reported as accessory components of the “tripartite”
RND system AcrAB-TolC [70-72]. Another
known tetrapartite RND efflux system is the CusCFBA complex, which transports heavy
metals copper and silver [73]. In this system, the small CusF component serves as a periplasmic
metal-binding chaperone, which hands over the metal-ion substrate to the IMP
transporter [74, 75]. The precise cellular
location and function of FusDDUF protein is not known at present.Early studies reported FA-detoxification genes found in Burkholderia
(formerly Pseudomonas) cepacia and
Klebsiella oxytoca [17, 18], which were attributed to FA resistance.
More recent work identified a tripartite FA efflux pump, FuaABC, in
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [52], while other work distinguished a large
number of the phylogenetically related FusC-type proteins, conferring FA resistance,
in numerous Gram-negative bacterial species [39]. Not all FusC proteins were predicted
components of FA efflux pumps; however they were assumed to be contributing to high
levels of FA resistance in some species, including Burkholderia.
Crutcher et al. reported positive correlation between the number of
putative FusC proteins in bacterial genomes and the level of resistance to FA; for
example, Burkholderia cepacia, harboring six predicted FusC
proteins, had a FA-MIC of ≥500 μg/mL, whereas Burkholderia glumae
had two FusC proteins and a FA-MIC of 200 μg/mL [39]. Strains with 0–1 fusC
genes were sensitive to FA with MIC <50 μg/mL. We also observed that our
Bp82Δbucl8-fusE mutant retained 100 μg/mL residual resistance
to FA. Through transcriptional analysis, we found that the five
fusC/FusC genes/proteins outside of the Bucl8-operon showed
little to no induction, indicating that the Bucl8-associated efflux pump is the main
contributor to FA resistance in B.
pseudomallei.The multidrug resistance in B. pseudomallei is
substantially attributed to previously studied RND efflux pumps BpeAB-OprB,
AmrAB-OprA, and BpeEF-OprC. At the same time, little is known about the role of FA
pumps in resistance against clinically used drugs. In our studies, we assessed the
role of Bucl8-associated pump in multidrug resistance in two ways: (i) we compared
the spectrum of resistance between parental strain Bp82 and Bucl8-pump deletion
mutant, and (ii) we expressed the bucl8-operon in a sensitive
E. coli strain. Although MICs for FA changed
as predicted, deletion of the Bucl8-pump did not affect MIC values for the
clinically-used drugs. This result is comparative to an FA pump in
S. maltophilia, which did not determine the
resistance to a large panel of therapeutics tested [52]. At the same time, a different study in the
same organism showed that deletion of the pcm-tolCsm operon,
encoding a different efflux pump, resulted in decreased MICs for several
antimicrobials of diverse classes (β-lactams, chloramphenicol, quinolone,
tetracycline, aminoglycosides, macrolides), and also decreased FA resistance [76]. Microarray data suggested
bucl8 expression was upregulated in the presence of
chloramphenicol [53] and
deletion of the tolCsm in S.
maltophilia resulted in decreased resistance to both CHL and FA
[76]. Both CHL and FA
harbor aromatic rings in their structures, however, our investigations did not
detect bucl8-operon induction by CHL nor changes in CHL resistance
levels in Bp82Δbucl8-fusE mutant or complemented
E. coli. Altogether, we cannot exclude a
possibility that redundant efflux systems are responsible for a lack of change in
the drug resistance we recorded in both the Burkholderia isogenic
mutant and complemented E. coli. Additional
experiments will be needed, employing defined efflux-pump-deletion mutants in both
hosts, to fully verify our conclusions presented here.Efflux pumps support physiological functions [65]. The decrease in bacterial growth of the
Bp82Δbucl8-fusE mutant suggests that the Bucl8-associated pump
may be involved in modulating essential cellular stresses, both in the environment
and in infectedhuman host [14]. Limited studies show that FA repressed quorum sensing genes,
expression of stress factors, secretion of siderophores, production of anti-fungal
metabolites, and iron uptake [77-80].
Additionally, Bucl8-associated pump may be involved in transport of aromatic
carboxylic acid compounds and act as a pHBA-metabolic efflux valve [40]. Other possible substrates
include p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), which is a key component of
folate synthesis or salicylate, used in foods and pain-relieving drugs. (Fig 7). Ongoing investigations are
aimed to define spectrum specificity of the Bucl8-associated efflux pumps in the
context of the human host.In summary, we conclude that Bucl8 is a component of a previously unreported
tetrapartite efflux system that is involved in FA resistance and cell physiology. We
have demonstrated that the extracellular Bucl8-CL domain forms the prototypic
collagen triple-helix, while the extracellular Bucl8-CL-Ct portion is capable of
binding to fibrinogen. Further studies will investigate what role fibrinogen binding
plays in pathogenesis. While the Bucl8-pump is likely not be involved in the MDR
phenotype of Burkholderia, we have identified FA and pHBA as
inducible substrates of the pump and will continue to investigate metabolite analogs
that may affect cell function. Importantly, the growth of the Bucl8-pump deletion
mutant was significantly affected even in the absence of FA and pHBA. By
characterizing the Bucl8-associated efflux system, we can advance therapies and
strategies for combating these pathogens, including developing pump inhibitors,
targeting transport mechanisms, or identifying potential surface-exposed vaccine
targets derived from Bucl8.
Primers.
(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
Genes and associated identification numbers of FusC loci.
(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
gBlock inserts for construction of recombinant proteins.
(DOCX)Click here for additional data file.
bucl8 allele variants.
(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Uncropped and unadjusted SDS-PAGE gel of purified rBucl8-Ct and
rBucl8-CL-Ct constructs from Fig 1D.
Authors: Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Isabell R Loftin; Sylvia Franke; Sue A Roberts; Andrzej Weichsel; Annie Héroux; William R Montfort; Christopher Rensing; Megan M McEvoy Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2005-08-09 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Errett C Hobbs; Xuefeng Yin; Brian J Paul; Jillian L Astarita; Gisela Storz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: K Poole; N Gotoh; H Tsujimoto; Q Zhao; A Wada; T Yamasaki; S Neshat; J Yamagishi; X Z Li; T Nishino Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 3.501
Authors: Philip Hinchliffe; Nicholas P Greene; Neil G Paterson; Allister Crow; Colin Hughes; Vassilis Koronakis Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Ilyas Alav; Jessica Kobylka; Miriam S Kuth; Klaas M Pos; Martin Picard; Jessica M A Blair; Vassiliy N Bavro Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Megan E Grund; Eliza Kramarska; Soo Jeon Choi; Dudley H McNitt; Christopher P Klimko; Nathaniel O Rill; Jennifer L Dankmeyer; Jennifer L Shoe; Melissa Hunter; David P Fetterer; Zander M Hedrick; Ivan Velez; Sergei S Biryukov; Christopher K Cote; Rita Berisio; Slawomir Lukomski Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Date: 2021-10-20