Literature DB >> 25926825

Efflux pump-mediated drug resistance in Burkholderia.

Nicole L Podnecky1, Katherine A Rhodes2, Herbert P Schweizer2.   

Abstract

Several members of the genus Burkholderia are prominent pathogens. Infections caused by these bacteria are difficult to treat because of significant antibiotic resistance. Virtually all Burkholderia species are also resistant to polymyxin, prohibiting use of drugs like colistin that are available for treatment of infections caused by most other drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Despite clinical significance and antibiotic resistance of Burkholderia species, characterization of efflux pumps lags behind other non-enteric Gram-negative pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although efflux pumps have been described in several Burkholderia species, they have been best studied in Burkholderia cenocepacia and B. pseudomallei. As in other non-enteric Gram-negatives, efflux pumps of the resistance nodulation cell division (RND) family are the clinically most significant efflux systems in these two species. Several efflux pumps were described in B. cenocepacia, which when expressed confer resistance to clinically significant antibiotics, including aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines. Three RND pumps have been characterized in B. pseudomallei, two of which confer either intrinsic or acquired resistance to aminoglycosides, macrolides, chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, trimethoprim, and in some instances trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole. Several strains of the host-adapted B. mallei, a clone of B. pseudomallei, lack AmrAB-OprA, and are therefore aminoglycoside and macrolide susceptible. B. thailandensis is closely related to B. pseudomallei, but non-pathogenic to humans. Its pump repertoire and ensuing drug resistance profile parallels that of B. pseudomallei. An efflux pump in B. vietnamiensis plays a significant role in acquired aminoglycoside resistance. Summarily, efflux pumps are significant players in Burkholderia drug resistance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burkholderia; adaptation; antibiotics; efflux pump; resistance

Year:  2015        PMID: 25926825      PMCID: PMC4396416          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


The Genus Burkholderia

The genus Burkholderia comprises metabolically diverse and adaptable Gram-negative bacteria that are able to thrive in different, often adversarial, environments. Their metabolic versatility and adaptability is in part due to the coding capacity provided by large (7–9 Mb) genomes consisting of several chromosomes and in some species, e.g., Burkholderia cenocepacia, plasmids (Holden et al., 2004, 2009; Agnoli et al., 2012). Many members of the genus are clinically significant pathogens with renowned virulence potential (Tegos et al., 2012) and drug resistance (Burns, 2007). In contrast to most other Gram-negative pathogens, Burkholderia species are intrinsically polymyxin resistant and therefore colistin cannot be used as drug of last resort (Loutet and Valvano, 2011). Despite clinical significance and recognized antibiotic resistance of Burkholderia species, characterization of efflux pumps lags significantly behind other non-enteric Gram-negative pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Nikaido and Pages, 2012). Many Burkholderia efflux systems have homologs in other Gram-negatives, including A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, and it is now generally believed that the multidrug resistance exhibited by these opportunistic pathogens is largely attributable to the existence of similar efflux pumps in these organisms (Poole, 2001; McGowan, 2006). As with other Gram-negative bacteria, the relative roles that individual efflux pumps play in intrinsic or acquired antibiotic resistance in the respective Burkholderia species are in many instances difficult to discern for various reasons: (1) a subset of the pumps found in any organism usually exhibits a considerable degree of substrate promiscuity, i.e., they recognize and extrude chemically and structurally diverse compounds, which leads to similar multidrug resistance profiles; (2) many of the efflux systems are not expressed at significant levels in wild-type strains under laboratory conditions and there exists a significant knowledge gap regarding the environmental conditions under which efflux genes are expressed; and (3) well characterized clinical or laboratory isolates expressing or lacking the respective efflux pumps often do not exist or are difficult to obtain (Mima and Schweizer, 2010; Coenye et al., 2011; Biot et al., 2013; Buroni et al., 2014). In this review we will summarize the current state of knowledge of efflux pumps and their roles in antibiotic resistance in the genus Burkholderia, which have been characterized to various degrees in a few representative organisms.

Burkholderia cepacia Complex

The Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) currently comprises 17 closely related species (Mahenthiralingam et al., 2005; Vanlaere et al., 2009; Vandamme and Dawyndt, 2011). Some BCC members exhibit beneficial aspects such as use in biocontrol, a practice that has since been abandoned because of the risk of infection of compromised individuals (Kang et al., 1998). Many are opportunistic pathogens, being particularly problematic for cystic fibrosis patients and immune compromised individuals. B. cenocepacia and B. multivorans account for 85% of all BCC infections (Drevinek and Mahenthiralingam, 2010). BCC infections are difficult to treat because of intrinsic antibiotic resistance and persistence in the presence of antimicrobials (Golini et al., 2004; Peeters et al., 2009; Rajendran et al., 2010; Jassem et al., 2011). B. vietnamiensis belongs to the BCC group and sporadically infects cystic fibrosis patients (Jassem et al., 2011).

Burkholderia pseudomallei

Burkholderia pseudomallei is a saprophyte and opportunistic pathogen endemic to tropical and subtropical regions of the world, and recent studies suggest that is more widespread than previously thought (Wiersinga et al., 2006, 2012, 2015; Currie et al., 2010). Since the U.S. anthrax attacks in 2001 the bacterium has received increasing attention because of its biothreat potential (Cheng et al., 2005), a history dating back to its use with malicious intent in a Sherlock Holmes short story (Vora, 2002). In the U.S. it is a strictly regulated Tier 1 select agent, which must be handled in approved biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) laboratories. The bacterium is the etiologic agent of melioidosis, a difficult-to-treat multifacteted disease (Wiersinga et al., 2006, 2012). The disease affects at-risk patients, including those suffering from cystic fibrosis (Schulin and Steinmetz, 2001; Holland et al., 2002), non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (Price et al., 2013), and diabetes (Simpson et al., 2003). B. pseudomallei infections are recalcitrant to antibiotic therapy because of the bacterium’s intrinsic resistance due to expression of resistance determinants such as β-lactamase and efflux pumps, as well as contributing factors such as both intracellular and biofilm lifestyles (Schweizer, 2012b).

Burkholderia mallei

Burkholderia mallei is an obligate zoonotic pathogen and the etiologic agent of glanders, which has been used as a bioweapon (Cheng et al., 2005; Whitlock et al., 2007). This bacterium likely diverged from B. pseudomallei upon introduction into an animal host approximately 3.5 million years ago (Losada et al., 2010; Song et al., 2010). The ensuing in-host evolution through massive expansion of insertion (IS) elements, IS-mediated gene deletion, and genome rearrangement, and prophage elimination is likely also responsible for the generally increased antibiotic susceptibility of B. mallei when compared to B. pseudomallei, presumably due to inactivation of resistance determinants (Nierman et al., 2004).

Burkholderia thailandensis

Burkholderia thailandensis is closely related to B. pseudomallei (Brett et al., 1998). Although B. thailandensis has sporadically been shown to cause human disease (Glass et al., 2006), it is generally considered non-pathogenic and has often been used as a surrogate for antimicrobial compound and vaccine efficacy studies because the bacterium can be handled at BSL-2. Some strains are more closely related to B. pseudomallei than others. For instance, unlike the widely used B. thailandensis prototype strain E264 (Brett et al., 1998), strain E555 expresses the same capsular polysaccharide as B. pseudomallei (Sim et al., 2010). Since capsular polysaccharide is a potent immunogen this similarity was exploited in a vaccine study, which showed that immunization with live cells of this avirulent strain protects mice from challenge with a virulent B. pseudomallei strain (Scott et al., 2013).

Burkholderia cenocepacia

Efflux Pumps and Drug Resistance

Early reports provided mostly indirect evidence that B. cenocepacia efflux pumps play a role in drug efflux. The synergy between reduced outer membrane permeability and efflux was cited as a common theme of the increased resistance that non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria like A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and B. (ceno)cepacia display (Hancock, 1998). An analysis of the DsbA–DsbB disulfide bond formation system revealed that dsbA and dsbB mutation resulted increased susceptibilities to a variety of antibiotics (Hayashi et al., 2000). This led to the conclusion that the DsbA–DsbB system might be involved in the formation of a multidrug resistance system. Another early report described an outer membrane lipoprotein involved in multiple antibiotic (chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, and ciprofloxacin) resistance (Burns et al., 1996). This protein, OpcM, is the outer membrane channel of an efflux pump of the resistance nodulation cell division (RND) family that was subsequently named CeoAB-OpcM, which was shown to be inducible by salicylate and chloramphenicol (Nair et al., 2004). Efflux was also shown early on to play a role in fluoroquinolone resistance (Zhang et al., 2001). Genome analysis and homology searches led to identification of an additional 14 open reading frames encoding putative components RND family efflux pumps (Guglierame et al., 2006). A summary of pertinent features of at least partially characterized B. cenocepacia RND efflux pumps and their relationships to RND systems in other Burkholderia species is presented in Table . Partially characterized resistance nodulation cell division (RND) efflux pumps in Burkholderia species. Expression of one of these, orf2, in Escherichia coli conferred resistance to several antibiotics (Guglierame et al., 2006). The roles of several RND transporters – RND-1, RND-3, and RND-4 – in intrinsic B. cenocepacia drug resistance was subsequently assessed by mutational analyses, which showed that RND-3 and RND-4, but not RND-1, contribute to B. cenocepacia’s intrinsic resistance to antibiotics and other inhibitory compounds (Buroni et al., 2009). A subsequent study comparing RND-4 and RND-9 single and double mutants confirmed the role that RND-4 plays in B. cenocepacia’s antibiotic resistance and also showed that RND-9 contributed only marginally to resistance (Bazzini et al., 2011b). Completion of the strain J2315 genome sequence showed that it encodes 16 RND efflux systems, which provides evidence for the biological relevance of these transporters in this bacterium and also enables global analyses of RND pump expression (Holden et al., 2009; Perrin et al., 2010; Bazzini et al., 2011a; Buroni et al., 2014). For example, deletion of the 16 putative RND operons from B. cenocepacia strain J2315 showed that these pumps play differential roles in the drug resistance of sessile (biofilm) and planktonic cells. These studies revealed that: (1) RND-3 and RND-4 play important roles in resistance to various antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin and tobramycin, in planktonic populations; (2) RND-3, RND-8, and RND-9 protect from the antimicrobial effects of tobramycin in biofilm cells; and (3) RND-8 and RND-9 do not play a role in ciprofloxacin resistance (Buroni et al., 2014). An emerging theme from these studies is that RND-3 seems to play a major role in B. cenocepacia’s intrinsic drug resistance. It was suggested that mutations in the RND-3 regulator-encoding gene may be responsible for this pump’s prevalent overexpression and accompanying high-level antibiotic resistance in clinical BCC isolates (Tseng et al., 2014). Studies aimed at assessing chlorhexidine mechanisms in B. cenocepacia J2315 confirmed the differential roles that RND pumps play in biofilm versus planktonically grown cells. RND-4 contributed to chlorhexidine resistance in planktonic cells, whereas RND-3 and RND-9 played a role in chlorhexidine resistance in sessile cells (Coenye et al., 2011). Mutational analyses of 2-thiopyridine resistant mutants showed that RND-4 confers resistance to an anti-tubercular 2-thiopyridine derivative (Scoffone et al., 2014). The involvement of efflux pumps in tigecycline resistance was inferred from the potentiating effects of the efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) MC-207,110 on tigecycline’s anti-B. cenocepacia activity (Rajendran et al., 2010). Efflux pumps belonging to other families may also contribute to B. cenocepacia’s drug resistance. Experiments with an immunodominant antigen in cystic fibrosis patients infected with B. cenocepacia identified a drug efflux pump, BcrA, which is a member of the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). It was shown to confer tetracycline and nalidixic acid resistance when expressed in E. coli (Wigfield et al., 2002). Upregulation of an efflux pump resulted in resistance to the phosphonic acid antibiotic fosfidomycin (Messiaen et al., 2011). This pump is a homolog of Fsr, a member of the MFS, which was previously shown to confer fosmidomycin resistance on E. coli (Fujisaki et al., 1996; Nishino and Yamaguchi, 2001).

Other Functions of B. cenocepacia RND Efflux Pumps

As with other Gram-negative bacteria, the function of B. cenocepacia efflux pumps extends beyond antibiotic resistance. In B. cenocepacia, these systems are involved in modulation of virulence-associated traits such as quorum sensing, biofilm formation, chemotaxis, and motility, as well as general physiological functions (Buroni et al., 2009; Bazzini et al., 2011a,b). A proteomic analysis of the effects of RND-4 gene deletion revealed about 70 differentially expressed proteins, most of which were associated with cellular functions other than drug resistance. This suggests that RND-4 plays a more general role in B. cenocepacia’s biology (Gamberi et al., 2013). Aside from the key role that efflux, especially RND-mediated efflux, plays in adaptation to antibiotic exposure (Bazzini et al., 2011b; Sass et al., 2011; Tseng et al., 2014), survival of Burkholderia species in various niche environments and accompanying conditions, e.g., the cystic fibrosis airways (Mira et al., 2011), marine habitats (Maravic et al., 2012), oxygen levels (Hemsley et al., 2014), exposure to noxious chemicals (Rushton et al., 2013), and other ecological niches (Liu et al., 2015), involves to various degrees changes in efflux pump expression.

Burkholderia pseudomallei

Initially, the presence of genomic DNA sequences in B. pseudomallei that hybridize with the multidrug resistance efflux gene oprM of P. aeruginosa was interpreted as evidence that efflux-mediated multidrug efflux systems may also be present in B. pseudomallei (Bianco et al., 1997). A recent survey of documented B. pseudomallei antibiotic resistance mechanisms indeed showed that efflux is the dominant mechanism affecting most classes of antibiotics (Schweizer, 2012b). Sequenced B. pseudomallei genomes encode numerous efflux systems, but as with other non-enteric bacteria only RND pumps have to date been shown to confer resistance to clinically significantly antibiotics. The K96243 and other B. pseudomallei genomes encode at least 10 RND systems, seven of which are encoded by chromosome 1 and three by chromosome 2 (Holden et al., 2004; Figure ). Although RND operon distribution is conserved amongst diverse B. pseudomallei strains, locations on the respective chromosomes may vary because of chromosome rearrangements. Bioinformatic analyses indicate that not all of the RND operons encode drug efflux pumps. For instance, one system seems to encode components of a general secretion (Sec) system. Although the presence of many RND systems can be detected in clinical and environmental isolates at the transcriptional (Kumar et al., 2008) and protein level (Schell et al., 2011), this expression is not necessarily linked to increased drug resistance. Meaningful studies to address their function are complicated because isogenetic progenitor and/or comparator strains are generally not available. Further hindering efflux pump characterization are select agent guidelines, which restrict certain methods, such as selection of spontaneous drug resistant mutants that may display altered efflux expression profiles. These investigations are now facilitated by the availability of several B. pseudomallei strains, for instance Bp82 (Propst et al., 2010), which are excluded from select agent rulings. To date three RND drug efflux pumps – AmrAB-OprA, BpeAB-OprB, and BpeEF-OprC – have been characterized in some detail (Figure ). There is evidence that small molecule compounds such as MC-207,110, phenothiazine antipsychotics, and antihistaminic drugs like promazine can be used to potentiate antibiotic efficacy, primarily by inhibition of RND efflux pumps (Chan et al., 2007b). Genomic location and operon organization of . (A) Chromosomal locations of RND efflux operons in strain K96243. Red arrows indicate the approximate locations and transcriptional orientations of RND operons on chromosomes 1 and 2. Operons encoding characterized efflux pumps are labeled. Although RND operon distribution is conserved amongst diverse B. pseudomallei strains, locations on the respective chromosomes may vary because of chromosome rearrangements. The origins of replication (ori) in the two strain K96243 chromosomes are marked. Their respective locations on the chromosomes of other strains may vary because of chromosome rearrangements. (B) Transcriptional organization of characterized RND operons. The genes encoding the membrane fusion proteins (amrA, bpeA, bpeE), RND transporter (amrB, bpeB, bpeF) and outer membrane protein channel (oprA, oprB, oprC) are color-coded. The bpeE–bpeF–oprC genes are in the same operon as llpE, which is annotated as a putative lipase/carboxyl esterase. LlpE is not required for BpeEF-OprC efflux pump function. Orthologs of LlpE are present in all annotated operons that encode bpeE–bpeF–oprC orthologs. The amrR and bpeR genes encode repressors of amrAB-oprA and bpeAB-oprB, respectively. The bpeT gene encodes a LysR-type transcriptional regulator of llpE-bpeE-bpeF-oprC.

AmrAB-OprA

The AmrAB-OprA efflux pump was the first efflux pump described in B. pseudomallei (Moore et al., 1999). It is responsible for this organism’s high-level intrinsic aminoglycoside and macrolide resistance (Moore et al., 1999; Viktorov et al., 2008). Rare (∼1 in 1,000) naturally occuring aminoglycoside susceptible B. pseudomallei isolates have previously been identified (Trunck et al., 2009; Podin et al., 2014). They do not express the AmrAB-OprA pump either due to regulatory mutations (Trunck et al., 2009), point mutations affecting the AmrB RND transporter amino acid sequence (Podin et al., 2014), or because the entire amrAB-oprM operon is missing due to a genomic deletion (Trunck et al., 2009). Although the AmrAB-OprA efflux pump is expressed in prototype strains, exposure to antimicrobials can select for unknown mutations that cause its over-expression resulting in increased resistance. For instance, prototype strain 1026b is moderately susceptible [minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) 4–8 μg/mL] to the ketolide cethromycin and exposure to this compound readily selects for highly resistant (MIC > 128 μg/mL) derivatives due to AmrAB-OprA over-expression (Mima et al., 2011). To date, AmrAB-OprA expression is the sole reported aminoglycoside and macrolide resistance mechanism observed in B. pseudomallei. AmrAB is closely related to P. aeruginosa MexXY, which is expressed in some aminoglycoside resistant mutants and together with OprM constitutes a functional effux pump (Mine et al., 1999; Sobel et al., 2003; Morita et al., 2012). MexXY associates with the mexAB-oprM encoded OprM outer channel protein because the mexXY operons of most P. aeruginosa strains do not encode a cognate outer mebrane channel protein. However, some strains, e.g., P. aeruginosa PA7, encode a mexAB-oprA operon akin and functionally equivalent to B. pseudomallei amrAB-oprA (Morita et al., 2012).

BpeAB-OprB

The BpeAB-OprB efflux pump was first described in strain KHW from Singapore (Chan et al., 2004) and subsequently characterized in Thai strain 1026b (Mima and Schweizer, 2010). It is not significantly expressed in wild-type strains. BpeAB-OprB expression is regulated by BpeR and bpeR mutants exhibit low-level chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolone, tetracycline, and macrolide resistance (Chan et al., 2004; Chan and Chua, 2005; Mima and Schweizer, 2010). Although the original studies with strain KHW indicated a role of BpeAB-OprB in aminoglycoside resistance (Chan et al., 2004), these results could not be confirmed with strain 1026b (Mima and Schweizer, 2010). At present, the observed differences in BpeAB-OprB substrate spectrum between strains KHW and 1026b are not understood. Because of the low levels of resistance bestowed by BpeAB-OprB and naturally occuring antibiotic resistant BpeAB-OprB over-expressing mutants have yet to be identified, the clinical significance of this pump remains unclear. Although BpeAB-OprB is related to P. aeruginosa MexAB-OprM (Poole et al., 1993; Li et al., 1995; Mima and Schweizer, 2010), the respective features are quite divergent. While P. aeruginosa MexAB-OprM is widely expressed and responsible for this bacterium’s intrinsic resistance to numerous antibacterial compounds (Poole et al., 1993; Li et al., 1995; Poole, 2001), B. pseudomallei BpeAB-OprB is not widely expressed and does seem to play only a minor role in this bacterium’s resistance to antimicrobials.

BpeEF-OprC

BpeEF-OprC was first identified as a chloramphenicol and trimethoprim efflux pump by expression in an efflux-compromised P. aeruginosa strain (Kumar et al., 2006). This pump is not expressed in B. pseudomallei wild-type strains, but only regulatory mutants. For instance, it is constitutively expressed in naturally occuring bpeT mutants (Hayden et al., 2012; Figure ). When expressed, BpeEF-OprC confers high-level resistance to chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, and trimethoprim. It is responsible for widespread trimethoprim resistance in clinical and environmental B. pseudomallei isolates (Podnecky et al., 2013). Pump expression is inducible by some pump substrates, which when present at sub MIC levels may lead to cross-resistance with other pump substrates (Schweizer, 2012a). The transcriptional regulator BpeT and locations of mutations causing multidrug resistance due to BpeEF-OprC expression. The figure illustrates the cause of BpeEF-OprC expression leading to a multidrug resistance phenotype due to bpeT mutations by comparing a prototype strain, in this instance a primary melioidosis isolate (strain 354b; Top), and a relapse isolate (strain 354e; Bottom). Strain 354b (Top) expresses wild-type BpeT that exhibits the typical LysR-type regular organization with an amino-terminal helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding domain and a co-inducer binding site located within the carboxy-terminal half. Point mutations located within the latter domain result in constitutive BpeEF-OprC efflux pump expression. Strain 354e (Bottom) expresses BpeEF-OprC constitutively due to deletion of the last 14 native bpeT codons as a consequence of a 800 kb inversion affecting chromosome 2 (Hayden et al., 2012). BpeEF-OprC is related to P. aeruginosa MexEF-OprN (Koehler et al., 1997), which shares properties such as substrate profiles and selection of pump-expressing regulatory mutants by chloramphenicol as previously demonstrated with both P. aeruginosa MexEF-OprN (Koehler et al., 1997) and B. thailandensis BpeEF-OprC (Biot et al., 2011).

Other Functions of B. pseudomallei Efflux Pumps

Quorum sensing is an important determinant of virulence factor regulation in bacteria. Numerous studies with P. aeruginosa indicate the involvement of several RND pumps in quorum sensing and thus several virulence traits by being involved in transport of cell-to-cell signaling molecules and their inhibitors (Evans et al., 1998; Pearson et al., 1999; Koehler et al., 2001; Aendekerk et al., 2005; Hirakata et al., 2009; Tian et al., 2009). At least one efflux pump regulator, MexT, modulates expression of virulence factors, albeit independent of the function of the MexEF-OprN efflux pump whose expression it regulates (Tian et al., 2009). A P. aeruginosa MexAB-OprM deletion strain is also compromised in its ability to invade Madin–Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells (Hirakata et al., 2009). Based on these findings with P. aeruginosa, several studies with B. pseudomallei explored the effects of efflux on quorum sensing and virulence. Studies with strain KHW showed that the BpeAB-OprB efflux pump was required: (1) for the secretion of the acyl homoserine lactones produced by this strains quorum-sensing systems (Chan et al., 2007a); and (2) secretion of several virulence-associated determinants, including siderophore and biofilm formation (Chan and Chua, 2005), but these observations could not be confirmed with strain 1026b (Mima and Schweizer, 2010). Cell invasion of and cytotoxicity toward human A549 lung epithelial and THP-1 macrophage cell were signifianctly reduced in a KHW BpeAB-deficient strain (Chan and Chua, 2005). Adherence to A549 cells and virulence in the BALB/c mouse intranasal infection model were not affected in the AmrAB-OprA deficient Bp340 mutant, a derivative of strain 1026b (Campos et al., 2013). BALB/c mouse intranasal infection studies also showed that in addition to AmrAB-OprA, BpeAB-OprB, and BpeEF-OprC were not required for virulence (Propst, 2011; Schweizer, 2012a). The AmrAB-OprA efflux pump is also not required for efficient killing of Caenorhabditis elegans by B. pseudomallei (O’Quinn et al., 2001). The BpeAB-OprB pump has been implicated in being involved in spermidine homeostasis in strain KHW with exogenous spermidine and N-acetylspermidine activating bpeA transcription (Chan and Chua, 2010).

Efflux Pumps in other Burkholderia Species

In part due to ongoing in host evolution of this obligate pathogen, B. mallei is generally more susceptible to antimicrobials than its progenitor B. pseudomallei. For instance, many B. mallei strains are susceptible to aminoglycosides. In the ATCC 23344 prototype strain this susceptibility results from a 50 kb chromosomal deletion encompassing the amrAB-oprA operon (Nierman et al., 2004). Strains NCTC10229 and NCTC10247 are likely aminoglycoside susceptible because only remnants of the amrAB-oprA operon are present (Winsor et al., 2008). Genes and operons encoding other efflux pumps, including BpeAB-OprB and BpeEF-OprC, are present but whether they encode functional efflux systems remains remains to be established. One study indicated the presence of an MFS efflux pump, with an associated regulatory protein of the multiple antibiotic resistance regulator (MarR) family (Grove, 2010). However, expression of the efflux pump was only responsive to urate, xanthine, and hypoxanthine and thus the significance of this transporter in B. thailandensis’ antibiotic resistance, if any, is unclear. In contrast, the contributions of RND pumps to this bacterium’s antibiotic resistance have been established. It was shown that chloramphenicol exposure selects for expression of an RND efflux pump, BpeEF-OprC, that also extrudes fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, and trimethoprim (Biot et al., 2011). Doxycycline selection resulted in mutants that either over-expressed AmrAB-OprA or BpeEF-OprC, and exhibited the multidrug resistance profiles associated with expression of these efflux pumps (Biot et al., 2013). Mutational analysis of these mutants suggested that BpeAB-OprB could at least partially substitute for absence of either AmrAB-OprA or BpeEF-OprC. Unlike other Gram-negative bacteria, cell envelope properties, efflux pump repertoire, and resulting drug resistance profile make B. thailandensis suitable as a B. pseudomallei BSL-2 surrogate for drug efficacy studies (Schweizer, 2012c).

Burkholderia vietnamiensis

Transposon mutagenesis studies aimed at identification of polymyxin B susceptible mutants identified a gene encoding a NorM multidrug efflux protein (Fehlner-Gardiner and Valvano, 2002). While norM expression in an E. coli acrAB deletion mutant complemented its norfloxacin susceptibility, its inactivation in B. vietnamiensis only affected susceptibility to polymyxin but not other antibiotics. Unlike other Burkholderia species, including most BCC members, the majority of environmental and clinical B. vietnamiensis isolates are aminoglycoside susceptible (Jassem et al., 2011). Aminoglycoside resistance as a result of chronic infection or in vitro exposure to aminoglycosides is the result of the AmrAB-OprM efflux pump, which is most likely a homolog of B. pseudomallei and B. thailandensis AmrAB-OprA (Jassem et al., 2011, 2014). Of note is the observation that efflux pump expression in mutants that acquired resistance during infection was due to missense mutations in the amrAB-oprM regulator amrR, but not those mutants derived from antibiotic pressure in vivo (Jassem et al., 2014).

Burkholderia Efflux Pump Mutants as Experimental Tools

The high-level intrinsic antibiotic resistance of many Burkholderia species complicates their genetic manipulation, use in studies of intracellular bacteria with the aminoglycoside protection assay, and drug efficacy studies. It has been shown that efflux-compromised mutants of B. cenocepacia and B. pseudomallei greatly facilitate genetic manipulation of these species, as well as cell invasion studies using the aminoglycoside protection assay (Dubarry et al., 2010; Hamad et al., 2010; Campos et al., 2013). Efflux-compromised strains of B. thailandensis and B. pseudomallei strains have also proved useful for study of the efflux propensity of novel antimicrobial compounds (Liu et al., 2011; Mima et al., 2011; Teng et al., 2013; Cummings et al., 2014).

Conclusion

Burkholderia species are well adapted to life in diverse, often adversarial, environments including those containing antimicrobials. This adaptation is facilitated by large genomes that bestow on the bacteria the ability to either degrade or expel noxious chemicals. As a result, opportunistic infections by pathogenic members of this species are difficult to treat because of intrinsic antibiotic resistance and persistence in the presence of antimicrobials. Resistance is in large part attributable to efflux pump expression, mostly members of the RND family. While the last decade has seen significant progress in study of drug efflux in Burkholderia species, progress still lags significantly behind other opportunistic pathogens, e.g., P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, where efflux pumps also play significant roles in intrinsic and acquired drug resistance. There are some unique aspects of efflux systems in Burkholderia species that are without parallel and studies of these may shed light on unique physiological functions of efflux pumps in these organisms. For instance, the first gene in the bpeEF-oprC operon, llpE, is co-transcribed with the genes encoding the BpeEF-OprC efflux pump components (Nair et al., 2004, 2005). Its deletion neither affects efflux pump function nor specificity for known antibiotic substrates. It is highly conserved throughout the Burkholderia genus and found in all sequenced genomes (Winsor et al., 2008). Based on homology, LlpE probably is an enzyme of the alpha/beta hydrolase family, recently annotated as a putative lipase/carboxyl esterase, and its conservation throughout the genus suggests an adaptation or survival benefit in a niche environment. The unique association of this enzyme with BpeEF-OprC and its role in Burkholderia biology warrant further studies of this enzyme. When reviewing the B. cenocepacia efflux pump literature it becomes evident that efflux pump nomenclature in this species, especially that of the RND family is non-uniform and confusing (for instance CeoAB-OpcM, RND-1 to RND-16, BCA gene names, Mex1, orf, etc.), which makes comparisons with other Gram-negative bacteria unnecessarily cumbersome. As with other Gram-negative bacteria, the nomenclature initiated in B. cenocepacia by Dr. Jane Burns’ laboratory in the early 2000s, i.e., CeoAB-OpcM (Nair et al., 2004), would make the most sense and it is a pity that it was not followed in subsequent studies.

Author Contributions

NP, KR, and HS contributed to all aspects of the work, including, but not limited to, conception and design, acquisition and analysis of data, writing the manuscript, and final approval of the version to be published.
Table 1

Partially characterized resistance nodulation cell division (RND) efflux pumps in Burkholderia species.

SpeciesEfflux pumpGene namesGene annotationMajor substratesReference
Burkholderia cenocepacia
RND-1NABCAS0591–BCAS0593Non-detectableBuroni et al. (2009)
RND-3NA1BCAL1674–BCAL1676Nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, chlorhexidine3Buroni et al. (2009, 2014), Coenye et al. (2011)
RND-4NA2BCAL2820–BCAL2822Aztreonam, chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, tobramycinBazzini et al. (2011b)
RND-8NABCAM0925–BCAM0927Tobramycin3Buroni et al. (2014)
RND-9NABCAM1945–BCAM1947Tobramycin3, chlorhexidine3Coenye et al. (2011), Buroni et al. (2014)
RND-10ceoAB-opcM4BCAM2551–BCAM2549Chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, trimethoprimNair et al. (2004)
B. pseudomallei
AmrAB-OprAamrAB-oprABPSL1804–BPSL1802Aminoglycosides, macrolides, cethromycinMoore et al. (1999), Mima et al. (2011)
BpeAB-OprBbpeAB-oprBBPSL0814–BPSL0816Chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines5Chan et al. (2004), Mima and Schweizer (2010)
BpeEF-OprCbpeEF-oprCBPSS0292–BPSS0294Chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, trimethoprim6Kumar et al. (2006), Schweizer (2012a,b)
B. thailandensis
AmrAB-OprAamrAB-oprABTH_I2445–BTH_I2443Aminoglycosides, macrolides, tetracyclinesBiot et al. (2013)
BpeAB-OprBbpeAB-oprBBTH_I0680–BTH_I0682TetracyclinesBiot et al. (2013)
BpeEF-OprCbpeEF-oprCBTH_II2106–BTH_II2104Chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazoleBiot et al. (2011, 2013)
B. vietnamiensis
AmrAB-OprMamrAB-oprMBcep1808_1574–Bcep1808_1576AminoglycosidesJassem et al. (2014)
  105 in total

Review 1.  Classification and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex: Past, present and future.

Authors:  Peter Vandamme; Peter Dawyndt
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Conservation of a novel protein associated with an antibiotic efflux operon in Burkholderia cenocepacia.

Authors:  Bindu M Nair; Lukasz A Joachimiak; Sujay Chattopadhyay; Idalia Montano; Jane L Burns
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Analysis of a complete library of putative drug transporter genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  K Nishino; A Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Efflux pump inhibitors reduce the invasiveness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Yoichi Hirakata; Akira Kondo; Kazuki Hoshino; Hisakazu Yano; Kazuaki Arai; Ayako Hirotani; Hiroyuki Kunishima; Natsuo Yamamoto; Masumitsu Hatta; Miho Kitagawa; Shigeru Kohno; Mitsuo Kaku
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  The BpeEF-OprC efflux pump is responsible for widespread trimethoprim resistance in clinical and environmental Burkholderia pseudomallei isolates.

Authors:  Nicole L Podnecky; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Sharon J Peacock; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cloning and characterization of the Burkholderia vietnamiensis norM gene encoding a multi-drug efflux protein.

Authors:  Christine C Fehlner-Gardiner; Miguel A Valvano
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2002-10-08       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Substituted diphenyl ethers as a novel chemotherapeutic platform against Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Jason E Cummings; Adam J Beaupre; Susan E Knudson; Nina Liu; Weixuan Yu; Carla Neckles; Hui Wang; Avinash Khanna; Gopal R Bommineni; Lily A Trunck; Herbert P Schweizer; Peter J Tonge; Richard A Slayden
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Involvement of the efflux pumps in chloramphenicol selected strains of Burkholderia thailandensis: proteomic and mechanistic evidence.

Authors:  Fabrice V Biot; Eric Valade; Eric Garnotel; Jacqueline Chevalier; Claude Villard; François M Thibault; Dominique R Vidal; Jean-Marie Pagès
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Efflux pump genes of the resistance-nodulation-division family in Burkholderia cenocepacia genome.

Authors:  Paola Guglierame; Maria Rosalia Pasca; Edda De Rossi; Silvia Buroni; Patrizio Arrigo; Giulia Manina; Giovanna Riccardi
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  The Burkholderia Genome Database: facilitating flexible queries and comparative analyses.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Winsor; Bhavjinder Khaira; Thea Van Rossum; Raymond Lo; Matthew D Whiteside; Fiona S L Brinkman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Therapies for multidrug resistant and extensively drug-resistant non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria causing nosocomial infections: a perilous journey toward 'molecularly targeted' therapy.

Authors:  Nadim G El Chakhtoura; Elie Saade; Alina Iovleva; Mohamad Yasmin; Brigid Wilson; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  Human Melioidosis.

Authors:  I Gassiep; M Armstrong; R Norton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Finafloxacin overcomes Burkholderia pseudomallei efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance.

Authors:  Linnell B Randall; Enrico Georgi; Gelimer H Genzel; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Development and validation of a triplex quantitative real-time PCR assay to detect efflux pump-mediated antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Jessica R Webb; Erin P Price; Nawarat Somprasong; Herbert P Schweizer; Robert W Baird; Bart J Currie; Derek S Sarovich
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.165

5.  Molecular determinants of Burkholderia pseudomallei BpeEF-OprC efflux pump expression.

Authors:  Katherine A Rhodes; Nawarat Somprasong; Nicole L Podnecky; Takehiko Mima; Sunisa Chirakul; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  Antibodies against In Vivo-Expressed Antigens Are Sufficient To Protect against Lethal Aerosol Infection with Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei.

Authors:  Shawn M Zimmerman; Jeremy S Dyke; Tomislav P Jelesijevic; Frank Michel; Eric R Lafontaine; Robert J Hogan
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Permeability Barrier of Gram-Negative Cell Envelopes and Approaches To Bypass It.

Authors:  Helen I Zgurskaya; Cesar A Löpez; S Gnanakaran
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.084

8.  Prediction of Burkholderia pseudomallei DsbA substrates identifies potential virulence factors and vaccine targets.

Authors:  Ben Vezina; Guillaume A Petit; Jennifer L Martin; Maria A Halili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia species.

Authors:  Katherine A Rhodes; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 18.500

10.  Versatile nourseothricin and streptomycin/spectinomycin resistance gene cassettes and their use in chromosome integration vectors.

Authors:  Stephanie S Lehman; Katherine M Mladinich; Angkana Boonyakanog; Takehiko Mima; RoxAnn R Karkhoff-Schweizer; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.