| Literature DB >> 33213471 |
Mirco Sandfort1,2, Amélie Vantaux3, Saorin Kim3, Thomas Obadia4,5, Anaïs Pepey3, Soazic Gardais4, Nimol Khim3, Dysoley Lek6,7, Michael White4,8, Leanne J Robinson8,9,10, Benoit Witkowski3, Ivo Mueller4,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After a marked reduction in malaria burden in Cambodia over the last decades, case numbers increased again in 2017-2018. In light of the national goal of malaria elimination by 2025, remaining pockets of high risk need to be well defined and strategies well-tailored to identify and target the persisting burden cost-effectively. This study presents species-specific prevalence estimates and risk stratification for a remote area in Cambodia.Entities:
Keywords: Cambodia; Forest; Greater Mekong Subregion; Hotspots; Occupational risk; Spatial; Vivax
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33213471 PMCID: PMC7678315 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-020-03482-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Geographic and demographic description of survey population. a Map of survey household locations, coloured by village in shades of blue, purple, or green if village is in category “outside forest”, “forest fringe”, or “inside forest”, respectively. Background Landsat-8 image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey. b Representativeness of age distribution in women and men by overlaying distribution in census (bars) by distribution in survey (points)
Prevalence of PCR-detected infections
| N | PCR positivity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-infections | |||||
| Proportion (n) of survey samples | 4200 | 8.3% (349) | 6.4% (268) | 3.0% (125) | 1.1% (48) |
| Extrapolated population prevalence | 10,053 | 8.9% | 6.8% | 3.3% | 1.3% |
| Extrapolated prevalence per village | |||||
| Trapaingphiae | 594 | 0.6% (3) | 0.6% (3) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
| Chhnaeng | 550 | 2.7% (12) | 1.9% (8) | 0.9% (4) | 0.3% (1) |
| Oham | 333 | 8.0% (20) | 6.2% (16) | 2.9% (7) | 1.1% (3) |
| Ohrana | 470 | 5.7% (25) | 4.2% (18) | 1.8% (8) | 0.2% (1) |
| Sraepreas | 228 | 6.5% (13) | 5.6% (11) | 1.7% (3) | 0.8% (1) |
| Sraektum | 296 | 13.1% (36) | 8.6% (24) | 4.8% (13) | 0.8% (2) |
| Lapakhe | 71 | 10.6% (4) | 6.7% (3) | 7.8% (2) | 3.9% (1) |
| Ohkaunpreas | 317 | 6.9% (21) | 5.9% (18) | 1.7% (5) | 0.7% (2) |
| Trapaingtouk | 201 | 1.9% (3) | 1.2% (2) | 0.6% (1) | 0% (0) |
| Poucha | 239 | 9.7% (24) | 6.7% (17) | 4.3% (10) | 1.4% (3) |
| Sraeampilkroam | 218 | 11.0% (23) | 7.2% (15) | 3.8% (8) | 0.6% (1) |
| Sraeampilleu | 168 | 10.6% (17) | 8.2% (13) | 2.4% (4) | 0% (0) |
| Beng-Gaty | 106 | 37.9% (40) | 30.9% (32) | 25.1% (27) | 18.1% (19) |
| Ohchra | 152 | 40.4% (60) | 36.3% (54) | 10.0% (15) | 5.9% (9) |
| Sraelvy | 154 | 18.7% (28) | 15.5% (23) | 3.9% (6) | 1.3% (2) |
| Ohtrone | 103 | 19.7% (20) | 10.4% (11) | 12.4% (12) | 3.1% (3) |
As proportions of positive blood samples or as census population-level estimates by extrapolation via post-sampling weights (raw numbers of positive samples in brackets). 4 positive P. malariae samples omitted
Fig. 2Prevalence of P. vivax infection per village (as boxplots by proximity of villages to the forest in a and as squares in b). Household locations of survey participants in the map background, transparently coloured by village in shades of blue, purple, or green if village is in category “outside forest”, “forest fringe”, or “inside forest”, respectively. Significance asterisk for Kruskal–Wallis test of differences in village-level prevalence
Detectability of infections through the public health care system
| Measure | PCR positivity | |
|---|---|---|
| LM+ | 16.8% (45/268) | 25.6% (32/125) |
| Symptoms at interview | 6.7% (18/268) | 16.8% (21/125) |
| Symptoms & LM+ | 2.2% (6/268) | 4.8% (6/125) |
| Symptoms & RDT+ | 0.4% (1*/268) | 4.0% (5/125) |
| Symptoms & RDT/LM+ | 2.2% (6/268) | 7.2% (9/125) |
Proportion (N) of PCR-positive samples that were also detectable by LM, inspection of symptoms, or by testing of symptomatic individuals with LM or RDTs
*Actually RDT+ for P. falciparum in a co-infection with P. vivax as by PCR
Densities of asexual and sexual stages in LM+ samples
| LM positivity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Proportion (N) of LM+ samples with detected asexual parasites | 100% (37/37) | 81.5% (22/27) |
| Geometric mean [/μl blood] | 149.7 | 431.3 |
| Range [/μl blood] | 15.4–22,674.7 | 14.3–41,724.6 |
| Proportion (N) of LM+ samples with gametocytes | 2.7% (1/37) | 37.0% (10/27) |
| Geometric mean [/μl blood] | 31.9 | 51.1 |
| Range [/μl blood] | 31.9–31.9 | 15.6–175.0 |
Geometric mean and range always given from among samples with non-zero densities
Fig. 3Prevalence of Plasmodium infection by age per gender and category of village forest proximity. Significance asterisks for test of differences in prevalence across age groups per gender strata
Univariate association of infection risk and behavioural covariates
| Covariate | N | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence | Prevalence | ||||
| None | 3465 | 4.9% (171) | < 0.001 | 2.0% (70) | < 0.001 |
| Field sites | 90 | 3.3% (3) | 4.4% (4) | ||
| Forest sites | 268 | 22.4% (60) | 14.9% (40) | ||
| A village | 177 | 13.6% (24) | 5.6% (10) | ||
| A city | 59 | 1.7% (1) | 0% (0) | ||
| Unspecified | 123 | 7.3% (9) | 0.8% (1) | ||
| …deep forest | |||||
| No | 4055 | 5.7% (231) | < 0.001 | 2.4% (98) | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 145 | 25.5% (37) | 18.6% (27) | ||
| …cassava field | |||||
| No | 2115 | 5.6% (118) | < 0.05 | 2.9% (62) | n.s |
| Yes | 2085 | 7.2% (150) | 3.0% (63) | ||
| No work | |||||
| No | 3186 | 7.9% (253) | < 0.001 | 3.7% (119) | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 1014 | 1.5% (15) | 0.6% (6) | ||
| Indoors | 4124 | 6.2% (256) | < 0.01 | 2.9% (118) | < 0.01 |
| Outdoors | 76 | 15.8% (12) | 9.2% (7) | ||
| No | 3668 | 6.7% (247) | < 0.05 | 3.2% (116) | < 0.10 |
| Yes | 524 | 4.0% (21) | 1.7% (9) | ||
| No | 320 | 10.0% (32) | < 0.01 | 6.6% (21) | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 3880 | 6.1% (236) | 2.7% (104) | ||
Prevalence (n) of PCR-positivity across the strata of those behavioural variables that were statistically significant in univariate logistic regression. “n.s.”: Not significant
Risk factors after multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression for Plasmodium infection as detected by PCR
| Covariate | N | aOR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 2231 | Reference | < 0.001 | |
| Male | 1969 | 3.06 | [2.26–4.13] | |
| Age [years] | ||||
| 2–10 | 1054 | Reference | < 0.001 | |
| 11–15 | 527 | 4.51 | [2.52–8.06] | |
| 16–20 | 424 | 7.47 | [4.14–13.47] | |
| 21–25 | 335 | 7.84 | [4.20–14.63] | |
| 26–30 | 347 | 8.08 | [4.36–14.94] | |
| 31–35 | 309 | 7.71 | [4.05–14.70] | |
| 36–40 | 289 | 7.15 | [3.76–13.58] | |
| 41–45 | 244 | 5.33 | [2.67–10.65] | |
| 46–50 | 197 | 4.16 | [1.92–8.99] | |
| 51–80 | 474 | 2.68 | [1.36–5.29] | |
| Forest proximity of village | ||||
| Outside forest | 3060 | Reference | < 0.001 | |
| Forest fringe | 625 | 2.14 | [1.02–4.52] | |
| Inside forest | 515 | 12.47 | [6.29–24.71] | |
| Material of roof | ||||
| Grass/leaves | 81 | 0.96 | [0.26–3.55] | < 0.01 |
| Tent | 79 | 3.43 | [1.36–8.64] | |
| Corrugated iron | 3301 | Reference | ||
| Wood planks/cement/tiles | 739 | 0.50 | [0.30–0.84] | |
| Household owns a toilet | ||||
| No | 2383 | Reference | < 0.05 | |
| Yes | 1816 | 0.69 | [0.48–1.00] | |
| Household owns buffaloes | ||||
| No | 3977 | Reference | < 0.01 | |
| Yes | 222 | 2.11 | [1.21–3.69] | |
| Household head had received information on malaria via TV in the past 3 months | ||||
| No | 3784 | Reference | < 0.01 | |
| Yes | 415 | 0.37 | [0.16–0.81] | |
| Insecticides had been sprayed inside the house in the past year | ||||
| No | 2935 | Reference | < 0.01 | |
| Yes | 1264 | 0.62 | [0.43–0.89] | |
| Slept outdoors last night | ||||
| No | 4124 | Reference | 0.08 | |
| Yes | 76 | 1.99 | [0.93–4.25] | |
| Slept under net last night | ||||
| No | 320 | Reference | 0.96 | |
| Yes | 3880 | 0.99 | [0.61–1.59] | |
| Work-unrelated travels overnight in the last month to… | ||||
| None | 3465 | Reference | < 0.01 | |
| Field sites | 90 | 0.63 | [0.25–1.59] | |
| Forest sites | 268 | 2.17 | [1.41–3.35] | |
| A village | 177 | 1.28 | [0.75–2.17] | |
| A city | 59 | 0.27 | [0.03–2.13] | |
| Unspecified | 123 | 1.23 | [0.56–2.74] | |
| Work in the last two months in… | ||||
| …deep forest | ||||
| No | 4055 | Reference | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 145 | 2.88 | [1.69–4.93] | |
| …cassava field | ||||
| No | 2115 | Reference | < 0.05 | |
| Yes | 2085 | 1.37 | [1.01–1.85] | |
Fig. 4Spatial clusters of Plasmodium infection (red-shaded circles) as detected by covariate-adjusted SaTScan analysis. White dots represent household locations in the survey, red dots for PCR-positive participants