| Literature DB >> 29859089 |
Andrew A Lover1, Emily Dantzer2, Bouasy Hongvanthong3, Keobouphaphone Chindavongsa3, Susie Welty4, Tania Reza4, Nimol Khim5, Didier Menard6, Adam Bennett2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lao People Democratic Republic (PDR; Laos), a landlocked country in Southeast Asia, has made important progress in reducing malaria morbidity and mortality in the past 5-6 years, and the northern provinces have very low reported incidence. To support national progress towards elimination, it is critical to verify and understand these changes in disease burden.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29859089 PMCID: PMC5984820 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2367-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Overview of study sites, Lao PDR
Fig. 2CONSORT diagram of study enrollment
Selected demographic features of survey participants (N = 5082), malaria parasite and risk-factor survey, Northern Lao PDR
| Characteristic | n | % of total (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 2380 | 46.8 (45.7–48.0%) |
| Female | 2702 | 53.2 (52.0–54.3%) |
| Age group | ||
| < 5 | 273 | 5.4 (4.6–6.3%) |
| 5–15 | 1198 | 23.6 (21.9–25.3%) |
| > 15 | 3611 | 71.0 (73.0–36.1%) |
| Slept under treated net previous night | ||
| Yes | 1767 | 34.8 (29.0–41.0%) |
| No | 3315 | 65.2 (59.0–71.0%) |
| Slept under any net previous night | ||
| Yes | 1781 | 35.1 (29.3–41.3%) |
| No | 3301 | 65.0 (58.7–70.7%) |
| Febrile at survey (≥ 37.5 °C) | ||
| Yes | 22 | 0.43 (0.27–0.7%) |
| No | 5057 | 99.6 (99.3–99.7%) |
| Age, if febrile at survey (≥ 37.5 °C) | median (IQR): 25.5 (9–35) | |
| Resident in household with any fever in 2 weeks prior to survey | ||
| Yes | 1144 | 22.5 (19.2–26.2%) |
| No | 3398 | 77.5 (73.8–80.1%) |
| Resident in household with any forest-goers | ||
| Yes | 1910 | 37.6 (32.0–43.5%) |
| No | 3172 | 62.4 (56.5–68.0%) |
“Forest-goer” defined as household where anyone sometimes go to the forest, forest fringe, farms, or rice fields and sleeps there overnight
Malaria parasite species identified by PCR (N = 39), Northern Lao PDR
| Species | n | % of PCR-positives; 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
|
| 28 | 71.8 (46.1–88.4) |
|
| 5 | 12.8 (4.5–31.6) |
|
| 3 | 7.7 (1.9–26.7) |
|
| 2 | 5.1 (1.1–21.6) |
|
| 1 | 2.6 (0.3–18.7) |
| All species | 39 |
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) variants identified by sequencing after initial Luminex screen, Northern Lao PDR (N = 910)
| Genotype | n | % of total tested (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Union | 14 | 1.5 (0.84–2.6) |
| Viangchan | 11 | 1.2 (0.60–2.2) |
| Canton | 4 | 0.44 (0.12–1.1) |
| Mahidol | 1 | 0.11 (0.028–0.61) |
| Wild type | 878 | 96.5 (95.1–97.6) |
| Not interpretable | 2 | 0.22 (0.027–0.80) |
Fig. 3Age-stratified malaria prevalence rate (all species) by PCR, Northern Lao PDR
Fig. 4Adjusted odds ratios, associations with PCR-based parasitaemia (all species), Northern Lao PDR. HH household
Multivariable risk factors for PCR-positivity (all species), malaria parasite and risk-factor survey, Northern Lao PDR
| Risk factor | Unadjusted OR | [95% CI] | p-value | aOR | [95% CI] | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Paktha | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – |
| Muang Et | 0.96 | 0.31–2.94 | 0.942 | 1.77 | 0.74–4.24 | 0.197 | |
| Nambak | 0.28 | 0.035–2.28 | 0.232 | 0.28 | 0.048–1.64 | 0.157 | |
| Khua | 2.91 | 0.83–10.18 | 0.94 |
|
|
| |
| Wealth quantile | Highest | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – |
| Middle high | 1.95 | 0.57–6.60 | 0.281 | 2.13 | 0.87–5.24 | 0.097 | |
| Middle low | 2.03 | 0.63–6.46 | 0.229 | 1.63 | 0.59–4.50 | 0.345 | |
| Lowest |
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Does HH own any type of net (bed net or hammock) to sleep under? | Yes | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | |
| No |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Have you ever heard of malaria? | Yes | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – |
| No | 1.44 | 0.61–3.39 | 0.396 | 0.71 | 0.38–1.34 | 0.286 | |
| Don’t know |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Source of malaria knowledge | Not brochure or poster | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – |
| Brochure or poster | 5.28 | 0.637–44.46 | 0.124 |
|
|
| |
| Does anyone in HH go to forest or forest-fringe sites overnight? | No | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – |
| Yes |
|
|
| 1.77 | 0.78–4.01 | 0.169 | |
| Any cases in village outside household? | No | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – |
| Yes | 2.07 | 0.13–5.30 | 0.128 | 3.00 | 0.993–9.08 | 0.051 | |
| Any other cases in household? | No | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | – |
| Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sex | Male | Reference | – | – | Reference | – | |
| Female | 1.27 | 0.80–2.00 | 0.305 | 1.18 | 0.69–2.02 | 0.549 | |
| Age in years | Continuous | 0.986 | 0.97–1.01 | 0.146 | 0.995 | 0.98–1.01 | 0.563 |
Risk factors with p < 0.05 are shown in italicface
HH household